But that religion doesn’t call for replacing the Consitution.
In fact its pretty clear on “not breaking covenanants”
Hell, even that evil bastard Osmama Bin Laden agrees with “not breaking covenants”
“If [your coreligionists] ask for your aid in religion, then you must help them, except against people with whom you have covenants with.” (Quran, 8:72)
“Perhaps you monitored the trial of brother Faysal Shahzad. In it he was asked about the oath that he took when he got American citizenship. And he responded by saying that he lied. You should know that it is not permissible in Islam to betray trust and break a covenant. Perhaps the brother was not aware of this. Please ask the brothers in Taliban Pakistan to explain this point to their members. In one of the pictures, brother Faysal Shahzad was with commander Mahsud; please find out if Mahsud knows that getting the American citizenship requires talking an oath to not harm America. This is a very important matter because we do not want al-Mujahidin to be accused of breaking a covenant.”
The Nazi analogy is a major stretch
Hardly.
Both religions require the death and/or enslavement of infidels.
Both religions are spread by war and violence
Both religions require absolutely loyalty
Both religions prohibited by death and criticism or questioning of their religions
Shall I go on?
And please google the word - Taqiyya - yes, it is OK to lie to an infidel.