Posted on 06/03/2012 5:29:58 AM PDT by Kaslin
“We shape our buildings; thereafter they shape us.”
—Winston Churchill
Art is powerful. Through art nations have been swayed toward greatness … and toward Obama. Via the arts souls have been lifted and wars have been waged. There’s no mistaking the mighty leverage art wields on people and lands.
For instance, on a personal level, my buddy Hambone Tweedle lives in a house that his wife has decorated with Hello Kitty swag, ubiquitous doilies and posters of fat baby angels who look like they’re stoned out of their gourd on Robitussin. His flat looks like Jan Crouch, Ross Matthews and Gianni Versace’s ghost had an open-ended interior design budget and went flippin’ nuts on the place. The home he’s henpecked to dwell in is a ghastly chick hell. The place screams, “This is no place for old men!” He’s emasculated. It’s a fait accompli for his cojones.
From a national standpoint, do you wanna know why folks in Communist nations are depressed and are forced at gunpoint to smile when U.S. cameras are rolling? Well, one reason, aside from the mediocre hell Communism spawns, is their art. It’s hard to feel chipper when the only works of art you behold are giant prints of the inbred dictator and the utilitarian gray block buildings he skimped on so he could have gold toilets in his 90-room mansion.
Art, as Churchill stated, shapes us. Good art lifts our spirits, opens mental doors, takes us to a happy place and/or gives us an attitude. That’s why I have a painting of a big middle finger in my foyer. Just kidding. I don’t have a big middle finger in my foyer. It’s actually in the stairwell.
Seriously, in the Giles Manor I have trophy animals and paintings of trophy animals, African warriors and Native American Indian warriors adorning my walls. Why do I have such a man cave? Well, one reason I have it so designed is we have three women in the house, and I’ve got to do something to offset all the bras and panties strewn everywhere. In addition, these awesome animals and warriors feed my soul. When I gaze at them it makes me feel stupid and weak when I whine like a 12-year-old girl if I don’t get my way.
Being fascinated with butt kicking beasts and people, I was duly impressed when I saw the digital painting that artist David Bugnon (Boo-nyon) did of the late Andrew Breitbart. David absolutely knocked it out of the park with his painting depicting Andrew as the consummate intellectual warrior that he was.
When it came to the cause of truth, Breitbart was one in a million: a provocateur par excellence. I saw his combatant spirit up close and personal when he and my family went through the 2009 ACORN scandal that my daughter Hannah Giles stirred up via her investigation.
Yep, Andrew would happily fight people, organizations and governments with tooth, fang and claw if he sensed any anti-American, BS-laden sentiments stemming from said lemmings, and Bugnon’s piece captures AB’s essence as a contrarian: confident and geared-up.
Look, I’m not a big fan of having paintings of contemporaries on my wall—especially paintings of other men; however, I’ve made room on my wall for a nice reproduction of Bugnon’s painting because I admire, appreciate and wish to emulate the moxie Andrew perfected for that which is just and true. I think I’ll put my print by my front door so as I depart my house and dive into the cultural trenches I will be ever mindful, thanks to Andrew’s example, that there are things worth scrapping for—and America’s founding docs are definitely one of them.
*Check out Bugnon’s painting: “Andrew Breitbart: I Am Compelled to Fight” here. 50% of David’s profits go to The Andrew Breitbart Children’s Trust.
Thanks Kaslin.
Someone could buy be one of these for my birthday. I wouldn’t mind.
Very cool...
I looked at it in the link, nice picture, thanks for posting it
Imagine our derision if the left did something similar with with Obama....
O' wait'... never mind
I love it and I’m ordering one. It’s just slightly tongue-in-cheek but also not kidding. Beautiful.
The left will have a field day with it.
This came to my mind immediately:
"A quintessential Nazi emblem, Hubert Lanzinger’s 1938 painting “The Flag Bearer” (Der Bannerträger) idealized Hitler as a Teutonic knight."
-"No country for old men", by Daniel Velarde
“If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you can ever imagine.” That didn’t happen with Hitler.
Only thing the painting needs is a Cross on his chest!
I liked Breitbart but this picture is a bit over the top. It makes me feel as if we’re waiting for Frodo to complete his secret task.
I didn’t know Breitbart was a midget!
The portrait is out of proportion.
The arms are too short for the shoulders and head, meanwhile his fingers look like water filled rubber gloves. Limp.
This painting is disturbing. Artist should go back to school and learn anatomy.
A bit ofay for my taste. I think it’s the clouds.
Mr. Breitbart is thinner, better groomed, and not nearly as tense and flushed as he was in reality. On the other hand, I hope to look better in posthumous art, myself ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.