interesting and certainly different path of investigation!
Article, and comments.
Thanks WildHighlander57.
Posted on 05/30/2012 4:25:42 AM PDT by pistolpackinpapa
Here we go again. Donald Trump has revived the issue concerning whether, or not, Barack Hussein Obama was born in the U.S. Wolfe Blitzer calls his remarks "ridiculous". The media is excoriating him and tying him to Romney, in an attempt to embarrass the Romney campaign at best or hurt Romney's election chances at worst. Now, here's my question:
With all the money and resources that Donald Trump has, why can he not get to the bottom of this thing once and for all? We can say that the powers that be are covering up for Prez dude. But, most people have their price. And, besides that, everyone in Hawaii and Kenya can't be corrupt. Someone's got to be honorable.
I do NOT believe that Obama was born here. I do NOT believe that his book bio was a "typo". I believe he was born in Kenya and is not Constitutionally eligible to be POTUS. But, I'm just a little ol' Texas country boy. Whereas Donald Trump has the wherewithal to get to the bottom of this once an for all. Why can he seemingly not do so. Let's settle this thing.
I’ll add my amen! to that.
If they found stacks of newspapers, then they might have found the original hard copies of the newspapers in which Obama’s birth was allegedly announced. So far, the ONLY copies have been from microfilm. If the actual newspapers do NOT contain that announcment, then Obama is toast.
interesting and certainly different path of investigation!
Article, and comments.
Thanks WildHighlander57.
Google “romney trump birther”...gets 62.3 million hits!
Birth certificates are not a matter of public record.
Would you like your neighbor to be able to get a copy of your kids’ BCs? You’re not going to get a copy of the 0 childrens’, either, at least not legally.
thanks for the ping...
What Bennet received was missing the name of the mother and the birthdate. I happen to find that SUPREMELY significant.
This is the only way he can win in November.
As for the election itself, the states hold the elections, not the Federal gov’t. Obama can do nothing legally to stop the election. Note that Presidential elections have never been suspended in a time of war.
And don't even suggest that Obama would use the military to stop the election or maintain an illegal hold on the Presidency. A soldier's oath of allegiance is to the Constitution, not the President. Furthermore, soldiers have a duty to refuse to obey an illegal order, such as the stopping of an election. The US military, which overwhelmingly despises Obama, would never back such crap.
Obama is a lawyer, not a warrior. He leads from behind, or to put it another way, out of the shadows. His are the actions of a sneak thief, not an armed robber. He will use fraud & the courts to steal this election, not the military or armed force.
You are correct about the military not obeying such an order.
I recall concerns expressed here about Clinton suspending elections...and there too we had them dissing the military (Hillary and no uniforms at white house) so in that case the military wouldn’t go along with such an order then either.
I’d worry more about a manufactured crisis disrupting peoples ability to travel or focus, rather than an outright suspension and use of military to enforce the suspension.
Probably the only manufactured crisis large enough to disrupt the election is full scale nuclear/biological/chemical war. This is the only manufactured crisis that could physically prevent an election. Again, I doubt the military would be a party to starting such a war. The generals/admirals would simply resign & expose the ruse.
There just isn't any manufactured crisis available to a President that can stop an election. Obama lacks a critical component of any coup: the support of the military.
If you or anyone can think of a credible scenario where Obama could stop the November election, I'd sure like to hear it.
When Israel takes out Iran’s nukes (hope they’re successful), Iran has stated it will strike at US mil interests in the area, which will of course necessitate the US hitting back. Also Iran has stated that cells in the US will activate as soon as Israel strikes Iran.
So no need to “manufacture” crap hitting the fan, it will hit willy nilly. Especially since the usurper has given favored status to Muzzies and removed any mention of them from terrorist descriptions and training, and of course the open borders. Plenty of “OTM” people sneaking in for years, under Bush as well. So the US is well larded with muzzies ready and willing to do their thing.
” That being the case, the other items to be verified “from the record” are clearly being verified only as being ON that record – not being the true facts of his birth. If they couldn’t verify the true date and place of birth or parents’ names because the record was legally invalid, then they can’t verify ANYTHING from that BC as being true. All they can verify is what is on it, not that what is on it is true. Which is actually what is implied in the certifying statement.”
Agreed.
Will your scenario be justification in YOUR mind to stop the election? Would you consider an Iranian terrorist attack a good reason to stop the election, or ever more reason to hold the election?
Iranian terror cells in the USA? Sorta like the Iraqi terror cells Saddam predicted? The Iranian regime will collapse quicker than the Iraqi regime.
I am far more concerned with the New Black Panther Party & its ties to Holder. Iran could not stop a dog catcher election in Podunk, but the NBPP could easily disrupt key elections in urban areas.
Hmm, Iran has funded all kinds of muz terrorist groups all over the place from Thailand to the M.E. to the US. If you think they can and will do no harm, that’s pretty odd.
Of course such events would not be a good reason to stop the election. And even if (when) Iran falls, that wouldn’t de-fang any groups already over in the US.
The New Black Pampers are few and although the effort will no doubt be made to rile up idiot black people, they are not spread all over the place, and I think the outcome will not be as Zero and his handlers wish. Once Zero and his handlers cross the line into outright violence, I think the equation is going to change mightily.
So much for the saying that no one is above the law. But you’re right, of course. And as I’ve said many times, it’s an awful thing that we have an Attorney General who’s so corrupt and complicit.
Great post - your points are, sadly, true.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.