I said that I have no doubt. It is my opinion and it is a strong one based on a lot of things.
But it’s not ME refusing to acknowledge facts in evidence.
I have yet to see Fred Nerks ADMIT that FMD lived in Honolulu from 1957 to 1963. It’s right there in the FBI files.
Why does he refuse to acknowledge it? How could a person so invested in research not even bother to look at FBI files.
It is absurd to believe he didn’t know.
This is even furthered by the fact that he STILL refuses to acknowledge it.
I read the FBI link and there is some contradictory stuff in there. But even if FMD lived at the Kalihi address; so effing what? It was not close to where the Dunhams lived (especially the Kalanianiole Hwy Address, that’s way past Honolulu in the other direction), and there is also - please pay attention - NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that Stanley Ann Dunham was in HI until approx. 1963. None. Zip. Nada. Or that she ever even MET FMD.
I think you’re barking mad, actually.
Also, it’s obvious you’ve never lived in HI, especially then. You say “13 miles” as though they were next door neighbors. Having lived in HI only a few years after the time line in question, I can assure you that often people never even left their neighborhoods often, a lot of people still walked to places or took the bus. That part of Kalihi Uka (up in the upper valley) was considered way out of the way. A teenage girl visiting a married man old enough to be her grandfather who had a wife and numerous children would be so noticeable and out of place that people would have talked, it’s ludicrous to even consider it (especially since there is not a single shred of evidence).
Barking mad.