Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America Doesn't Need NASA To Stay On Top In Space
IBD Editorials ^ | May 22, 2012 | Editor

Posted on 05/22/2012 7:07:20 PM PDT by Kaslin

Free Enterprise: For those worried that America's leadership in spaceflight died with NASA's downsizing, meet SpaceX, a private company that showed Tuesday how capitalism will do what government does and better.

NASA was once the pride of a country fighting a tense Cold War. It planned and executed what is arguably man's greatest achievement. It indeed engineered a giant leap for mankind.

Yet since those lunar landings, the agency has gotten bogged down in politics and bureaucracy, plagued by waste and ambitions that were never reached. Some believe President Obama's decision to cut NASA's budget and the closure of the shuttle program signal the end of manned spaceflight for the U.S. But it doesn't.

In the pre-dawn hours Tuesday, Space Exploration Technologies Corp. successfully launched its Falcon 9 rocket that was topped with the company's Dragon capsule. The unmanned Dragon is on course to dock with the International Space Station, where its 674 pounds of food and supplies will be welcomed by the crew on Friday.

On May 31, Dragon will return to Earth loaded with completed science experiments and other gear it will bring back from the space station.

Eventually, SpaceX will put more than hardware and supplies into orbit. It will put men into space.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.investors.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial
KEYWORDS: falcon9; iss; nasa; spacex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

1 posted on 05/22/2012 7:07:25 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All


Help End The Obama Era In 2012
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


2 posted on 05/22/2012 7:09:32 PM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Thanks Kaslin.


3 posted on 05/22/2012 7:10:39 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (FReepathon 2Q time -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: musicman

As long I they don’t have TSA screeners!


4 posted on 05/22/2012 7:14:01 PM PDT by occamrzr06
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Cool time to be alive.

/johnny

5 posted on 05/22/2012 7:14:49 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Apparently the heat shield on the Dragon is similar in composition to the latest and greatest heat shield tech from NASA, but SpaceX figured out how to make it for *one-tenth* the cost.

And it's supposed to be good for 10 re-entries from LEO.

6 posted on 05/22/2012 7:15:28 PM PDT by Campion ("Social justice" begins in the womb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

sure thing.... let me know the launch date for the next Mars mission


7 posted on 05/22/2012 7:17:56 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: occamrzr06
"As long I they don’t have TSA screeners!" I wish I had said that.
8 posted on 05/22/2012 7:20:42 PM PDT by chooseascreennamepat (The response to 1984 is 1776.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

With their Falcon heavy, essentially a triple booster they will be able to throw enough mass into LEO in two launches as the Saturn 5 did but cost much less. Plus they may be able to reuse two of the three boosters.

This could be the space model T. Not new capability, just an order of magnitude cost shift which is just as important.

They burn kerosene as opposed to liquid hydrogen. Can you say V2?


9 posted on 05/22/2012 7:21:41 PM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Don’t be duped into believing that our space program can be outsourced fully to private enterprise. It can’t, but this can be a convenient excuse to further dismantle a once a premier world-class agency. Private enterprise, alone, cannot take the long-term risks and and investments that are necessary.


10 posted on 05/22/2012 7:22:16 PM PDT by Swirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nifster
let me know the launch date for the next Mars mission

The date from FedGov has always been 30 years away, for the last 40 years.

That's a long wait where the train don't come.

/johnny

11 posted on 05/22/2012 7:22:58 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Hey, why not just outsource it to China? /s


12 posted on 05/22/2012 7:24:05 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swirl
I believe that private enterprise can take the risks and make the investments and will do it for much cheaper than FedGov can.

There will be failures. Just like PanAm failed, and the Crosley Motors car company.

/johnny

13 posted on 05/22/2012 7:30:07 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Heinlein’s dream of Delos David Harriman may be fulfilled yet.

We will see in the next 2 decades more advancement in space exploration than in the last 50 years.

God Bless NASA for getting us to the moon — but it is time to step aside and let the private sector get ‘er done.


14 posted on 05/22/2012 7:30:07 PM PDT by freedumb2003 ('RETRO' Abortions = performed on 84th trimester individuals who think killing babies is a "right.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swirl

Bullcrap. Government screws up every single thing it touches almost without exception.


15 posted on 05/22/2012 7:33:47 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"Private-sector space travel" my butt.

SpaceX efforts are "private" and "commercial" only through the loosest of characterizations. They have received well over $ 1 billion dollars in federal money over the years, mostly from DoD and NASA. Moreover, their promises greatly exceed their accomplishments -- to date, their Falcon 1 has two successes out of five attempts (and since rapidly dropped in favor of its successor) while the Falcon 9 has flown twice, not entirely without incident. No SpaceX launch vehicle has yet delivered a single paying commercial (and only one government payload, for Malaysia no less) to orbit.

SpaceX is one of three "high-tech" companies started and owned by Elon Musk, an Obama contributor. His other two companies make an electric car (Tesla) and solar power arrays (Solar Cities). Both of these companies have received DoE grants for development. Three companies, each taking federal dollars -- the grifter's trifecta.

The most egregious part of this bogus "commercial" New Space scam is that it is being marketed to the public as a new direction in spaceflight. In fact, it is merely another form of government contracting and the vehicles go nowhere beyond low Earth orbit, where we have been already going for the last 50 years. This fraudulent portrayal by the current administration and their lackeys is designed to deflect attention away from the fact that Obama has quietly and systematically dismantled the American civil space program.

16 posted on 05/22/2012 7:39:02 PM PDT by Cincinatus (Omnia relinquit servare Rempublicam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swirl
Don’t be duped into believing that our space program can be outsourced fully to private enterprise. It can’t, but this can be a convenient excuse to further dismantle a once a premier world-class agency. Private enterprise, alone, cannot take the long-term risks and and investments that are necessary.

You are correct.

17 posted on 05/22/2012 7:40:21 PM PDT by ILS21R (John Locke: When the social contract is broken, the people must revolt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: chooseascreennamepat

I don’t think that can be said enough.


18 posted on 05/22/2012 7:41:14 PM PDT by occamrzr06
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Swirl

This is what I’ve been beating into the minds of FReepers for some time now.. When I think NASA I think America, Old Glory, and ‘UNITED STATES’.. WE. When I see a SpaceX rocket go up I think of a dude with a lot of money with ‘SpaceX’ emblazoned on his oversized Estes rocket and I don’t think ‘WE’ and this less patriotic and less nationalistic mindset is Obama’s motive for crushing NASA and the long traditional history that goes along with it.


19 posted on 05/22/2012 7:41:50 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Bullcrap. Government screws up every single thing it touches almost without exception.

The exception must be that thing they're supposed to dock with.

20 posted on 05/22/2012 7:42:51 PM PDT by ILS21R (John Locke: When the social contract is broken, the people must revolt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson