Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tunehead54
"SCOTUS under original jurisdiction then arguably Sotomayor and Kagan would have to recuse themselves as a decision for ineligibility would nullify their appointments"

Hmmmm....and such a decision would then Nullify ALL Legislation "Approved" by the POTUS during such Fraud? Would the Unions be ordered to return all the Stimulus Funds they received, along with all the other Donors who were en-riched? If only ALL those who gained taxpayer $$$$ would be PERSONALLY LIABLE for paying it back, America would have a Resurrection (except for the inner city parasites, who would take to the Streets.....)

67 posted on 05/19/2012 9:58:36 AM PDT by traditional1 (Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: traditional1

All the reasons you state are good arguments for why candidates need to be “pre-vetted” when asking to be included on a state ballot.

I think a single congressman could have challenged the electoral college results but by then booting our second black president out was unimaginable. Sigh.

At this stage of the game I cannot imagine SCOTUS actually declaring Obama ineligible for the upcoming election much less requiring a “do-over” from 2008.

The problems you note, including rioting in the streets nationwide, would force the court to punt. We’ll have to beat him at the ballot box.


94 posted on 05/19/2012 2:16:50 PM PDT by Tunehead54 (Nothing funny here ;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson