To: ExTxMarine
Yep, all that evidence is exactly what I mean...it shows nothing except that there was a fight and Zimmerman was losing. You say you were a Marine, did you ever see anybody start a fight then get his ass kicked? I have plenty of times.
If you have real evidence that proves who started the fight then please post it....I'll check back later for it.
156 posted on
05/18/2012 9:51:31 AM PDT by
wtc911
(Amigo - you've been had.)
To: wtc911
Yep, all that evidence is exactly what I mean...it shows nothing except that there was a fight and Zimmerman was losing.
This is where you are WRONG!. This evidence shows that Zimmerman never put a finger on Martin except in a DEFENSIVE manner. Therefore, Zimmerman was the DEFENDANT and Martin was the ATTACKER.
Oh, now I get it, Zimmerman must have said a "dirty word", which so offended the 12-year old prepubescent, Skittles-toting toddler that he then punched Zimmerman. Therefore, it was Zimmerman's fault. I NOW understand you way of thinking.
166 posted on
05/18/2012 10:13:24 AM PDT by
ExTxMarine
(PRAYER: It's the only HOPE for real CHANGE in America!)
To: wtc911
"Yep, all that evidence is exactly what I mean...it shows nothing except that there was a fight and Zimmerman was losing. "
You say a fight between Zimmerman and Martin occurred. One of the definitions of "fight" is to "take part in a violent struggle involving the exchange of physical blows. Show me the physical evidence on Zimmerman that proves he was "fighting" with Martin, and exchanged physical blows with him.
209 posted on
05/18/2012 11:44:33 AM PDT by
mass55th
(Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson