[ExTxMarine]

Yep, all that evidence is exactly what I mean...it shows nothing except that there was a fight and Zimmerman was losing.

This is where you are WRONG!. This evidence shows that Zimmerman never put a finger on Martin except in a DEFENSIVE manner. Therefore, Zimmerman was the DEFENDANT and Martin was the ATTACKER.

Oh, now I get it, Zimmerman must have said a "dirty word", which so offended the 12-year old prepubescent, Skittles-toting toddler that he then punched Zimmerman. Therefore, it was Zimmerman's fault. I NOW understand you way of thinking.

[wtc911]

This evidence shows that Zimmerman never put a finger on Martin except in a DEFENSIVE manner

__________________________

Really? It shows that he never grabbed or pushed or punched in the chest...none of which would leave a mark on Zimmerman or Martin?,P>

It shows that he didn't show the gun or reach for it?

Please explain in detail (AND WITHOUT SHOUTING) exactly how the evidence shows this.