Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: AmonAmarth
To: AmonAmarth
Awww, come on Stephanie and bore us with the details.
3 posted on
05/15/2012 7:18:13 AM PDT by
kcvl
To: AmonAmarth
"Obama campaign: New York Times poll is 'biased'"Well, we've realized that for years! The Obama campaign has only discovered it now?
4 posted on
05/15/2012 7:20:08 AM PDT by
Sooth2222
("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
To: AmonAmarth
she didn't want to bore the viewers with talk of methodology Too complicated for the peons, huh?
You know it's bad when the Times can even make a poll look good.
To: AmonAmarth
“When pressed by Todd, Cutter said that she didn’t want to bore the viewers with talk of methodology, but repeated that she believed the poll was flawed.”
In other words, Todd won the argument.
6 posted on
05/15/2012 7:22:17 AM PDT by
headstamp 2
(Liberalism: Carrying adolescent values and behavior into adult life.)
To: AmonAmarth
Did he ask how Rasmussen's polling and Gallup's polling is "flawed", too?
Maybe, just maybe, the voting public is beginning to realize what an empty suit this guy is.
7 posted on
05/15/2012 7:22:49 AM PDT by
Sooth2222
("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
To: AmonAmarth
The dead seldom call back so I have to agree because that voting bloc is completely shut out of this poll.
8 posted on
05/15/2012 7:22:49 AM PDT by
xp38
To: AmonAmarth
They’re right. It IS biased. It sampled 36% Dems to only 30% Republicans. The 2012 margin will be much tighter than that.
9 posted on
05/15/2012 7:23:30 AM PDT by
AmonAmarth
(Wherever you go...There you are)
To: AmonAmarth
Well, I’m sure it’s possible to be in favor of homosexual marriage, and still think that Obama did this for political reasons.
You can be liberal, but still recognize that Obama does things for political reasons.
Or are we saying that liberals such as Obama only do things and take stances on issues, because they see their positions as lifting up oppressed people, giving people rights and justice and all that?
To: AmonAmarth
It sure WAS biased.
If it was done truthfully, Obama would have been down another 10 points!
13 posted on
05/15/2012 7:25:52 AM PDT by
Lazamataz
(The so-called 'mainstream' media has gone from "biased" straight to "utterly surreal".)
To: AmonAmarth
Satan is getting these souls at bargain basement prices, nowadays. It's a pity people don't place more value on their afterlife.
14 posted on
05/15/2012 7:29:49 AM PDT by
liberalh8ter
(If Barack has a memory like a steel trap, why can't he remember what the Constitution says?)
To: AmonAmarth
All this biased polling won’t help the Usurper. Better his cultish supporters think he and his policies are comfortably in the lead than otherwise.
18 posted on
05/15/2012 7:32:30 AM PDT by
luvbach1
(Stop the destruction in 2012 or continue the decline)
To: AmonAmarth
[[ Obama campaign: New York Times poll is ‘biased’ ]]
That’s “Rich”....
To: AmonAmarth
The NBPP, prisons, welfare recipients, the SEIU, the LGBT crowd and Hollywood were not polled. Therefore, the results are skewed.
To: AmonAmarth
A few weeks ago when a Gallup Poll was unfavorable to Obama, Axelrod said pretty much the same thing. I guess any poll showing their guy down must be flawed.
To: AmonAmarth
It probably is biased, they oversampled democrats and undersampled republicans and independents.
To: AmonAmarth
I believe the tactic being used by Cutter is called "pissing into the wind".
The results of that tactic is you end up covered with your own urine.
To: AmonAmarth
Secretary of Agriculture Vilsack (former Democratic governor of Iowa) was on "Morning Joe" this morning. He asserted that people in Iowa realize that Obama took his position out of principle (or the like--don't remember the exact words he used), and that the unemployment rate there is 5.5% or something like that, so Iowa will go for Obama in the fall.
Iowa is probably one of the states which is up for grabs. Obama would probably be able to count on it if he had picked Vilsack in 2008 instead of Biden. After all, Delaware is pretty safe for the Democrats no matter what.
To: AmonAmarth
... she believed the poll was flawed.
"Flawed but accurate."
27 posted on
05/15/2012 8:06:18 AM PDT by
RobinOfKingston
(The instinct toward liberalism is located in the part of the brain called the rectal lobe.)
To: Barak; obama; All
Obama campaign: New York Times poll is 'biased' Damn right it is.
Just think how bad you'd look if it wasn't.
29 posted on
05/15/2012 8:35:00 AM PDT by
ROCKLOBSTER
(Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson