Replies

I believe the communists and Islamists have united under George Soros, who has always been a communist and who now says that he fears that America will win the “war on terror” because it would strengthen both America and capitalism (the two great evils that Soros has to fight since he seriously believes he is God). Soros is the union of corrupt religion (Islam and a bunch of other rag-tag imitations) and corrupt government (communism) - Revelation’s beast out of the sea and beast out of the land. And he chose as his puppet Barack Obama, who has ALSO always been the union of communism and Islamism.

Just like Raila Odinga - Obama’s cousin in Kenya - was the union of communism and Islamism, as a Memorandum of Understanding signed by both Odinga and the Muslims in the 2007 election showed. And Obama’s campaign illegally sent $1 million to Odinga’s campaign. Obama illegally campaigned in person with Raila Odinga. And when the election was declared for Odinga’s opponent before the Odinga people were able to stuff enough ballot boxes, the Muslims made good on their promise and carried out the rampages that eventually got the UN to work out a “compromise” propelling Odinga into shared power. At least a million in US tax money went to Kenya to push a new Constitution on them - one which established sharia, starting in the Muslim areas (which is the way that Islamists have traditionally gotten sharia into whole countries). That was US taxpayer money spent to help Odinga carry out one of his promises in the Memorandum of Understanding he had signed with the Muslims in return for their support (murderous rampaging) to get him into power. IOW, US taxpayers funded that murderous communist-Islamist coup in Kenya, Obama’s most likely birthplace which sealed all records for Obama and unlawfully detained and deported Jerry Corsi when he was in Kenya researching. It’s easily seen how Obama bought Kenya’s silence...

According to top democratic sources for Bettina Viviano, Soros went to both Hillary and Obama in the 2008 primary season and asked if they were on board with his plans to destroy the US economy. Hillary wasn’t but Obama was. And then all of a sudden the people who intended to help Hillary confront the lawlessness of the DNC at the convention started showing up dead just weeks before the convention - one of whom (Bill Gwatney) was a good friend of Bill Clinton and thus effectively threatened him out of revealing Obama’s ineligibility as he and Hillary had been planning to do all along.

There is a book out (by a guy who has written white papers describing our vulnerability to economic terrorism) which suggests that the Sept 2008 run on the bank had long been planned by the Islamists (if I had my act together better I’d have a link for you on that), and right after the run on the bank communists such as Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez started saying, “Since capitalism has failed, the world should try communism”. Islamists like Zawahiri and Ahmadinejad were saying, “Since capitalism has failed, the world should try Islamic financing.” The IMF was meeting in Europe to decide what to do now that capitalism had failed.

Ghadaffi was saying that Muslims who had lawfully (only because the contributions were divided into many that were under $200 and thus didn’t have to be reported individually and because the Obama people had deliberately disabled the credit card tracking so the contributions would not be immediately recognizeable as illegal foreign contributions...) contributed to Obama’s campaign and that they were hoping he wouldn’t be too self-conscious after the election to be faithful to his Muslim religion and carry out the agenda the Muslims had supported him to carry out. In January of 2010 Obama felt the need to explain himself to the Muslim world and told the Egyptian ambassador that the Muslim world should be patient with him while he got Obamacare (communism) passed in America because then he would concentrate on the Muslim agenda - which he said he supports because he was and still is a Muslim.

As we all know, Obama was caught on an open microphone telling Medvedev that after the election he would have more “flexibility” in the talks about nuclear disarmament (agreements which the USA honor and which the communist-Islamists all over the world freely lie about, because communism and Islamism are all about lies. They come from the Father of Lies and officially embrace lying as a means for getting power and implementing tyranny).

There is way, way more to be said about the communist-Islamist alliance that is threatening the entire world. The bad thing is that most people refuse to hear it. It won’t fit into 60-second soundbites each hour, even if the MSM WOULD report the actual news (which they won’t, because most are in bed with the communist-Islamist agenda and the one which used to be better - Fox - was first threatened into silence and is now financially in bed with George Soros, the head of the communist-Islamist alliance. See post 62 at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2873887/posts?page=62 ; the last link in that post is about the financial ties with Soros).

Unholy Alliance: Radical Islam and the American Left
by David Horowitz

Amazon Book Review:
"Vastly Illuminating!" September 25, 2004
By Kat Bakhu

"I had long wondered why people on the Left had the propensity to speak more positively about people who would slit their throats than they do about their own country, which affords them more freedom and opportunity than anywhere else. David Horowitz has answered that question thoroughly and convincingly in his Unholy Alliance. Where I felt bewildered and confused, I now feel crystal clear. Unholy Alliance is such a great book.

It begins with the leftist movements at the beginning of the 20th Century, and works its way up to the present day, exploring the anti-American attitude of these movements in detail. Horowitz shows that the enemies of the US back then are largely the same group today, operating under the same misperceptions, making the same mistakes, and pursuing the same impossible utopia.

Individual chapters are included on the Patriot Act (I was persuaded that it is a GOOD thing); the democratic flip-flop on Iraq once G.W. Bush implemented what they agreed with Clinton needed to be done; the driving components of the current anti-war movement; as well as chapters on individual personalities who are major spokespeople of the Left. Horowitz covers a lot of ground, and he covers it concisely and clearly. Unholy Alliance is richly informative without ever being boring or plodding.

This book is so illuminating that I simply cannot do justice to it here. I love people who reason so clearly that they help me get my own reasoning clear. Horowitz is just that type of person! In the terrain of mindless clichés (no-blood-for-oil, etc.), he is a breath of real fresh air."
$22.36
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51WGRMWB35L._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-click,TopRight,35,-76_AA240_SH20_OU01_.jpg
__________________________________________________

Unholy Alliance: Radical Islam and the American Left -by David Horowitz
Not all dissent is equal, and Americans whose actions are calculated to give aide and comfort to the butchers who murdered 3,000 innocent people on September 11, 2001 are not patriotic at all... they are, in fact, quite the opposite.

$18.00 from David Horowitz's website, FrontPageMag.com:
(click on 'Bookstore' near the top of the page)
http://frontpagemag.com/

Re: 911...

August, 2003: Ward Churchill Caught On Tape Advocating Terrorism [vs Fellow Americans]

Audio link at Michell Malkin's website (included below)

Question from audience:
You mentioned a little bit ago, "Why did it take a bunch of Arabs to do what you all should have done a long time ago," that's my question.

Churchill: I'm gonna repeat that, tell me if I got that right: Why shouldn't we do something and how do you you move so they don't see you coming.

As to the first part, not a reason in the world that I could see. I can't find a single reason that you shouldn't in a principled way —there may be some practical considerations, such as do you know how (laughter from audience)

—you know, often these things are processes. It's not just an impulse. And certainly it's not just an event.

And the simple answer, although it probably should be more complicated, but I'm not being flip and giving the simple answer, is:
You carry the weapon. That's how they don't see it coming. You're the one...

They talk about "color blind or blind to your color." You said it yourself.

You don't send the Black Liberation Army into Wall Street to conduct an action.

You don't send the American Indian Movement into downtown Seattle to conduct an action.

Who do you send? You. Your beard shaved, your hair cut close, and wearing a banker's suit.

There's probably a whole lot more to it, you know that. But there's where you start. .."

more...

The audio is apparently no longer available -only transcript:
http://michellemalkin.com/archives/001588.htm