Skip to comments.Bully story a black eye for Mitt Romney
Posted on 05/11/2012 3:37:33 AM PDT by Diogenesis
Bully story a black eye for Mitt Romney
"Straight-laced and squeaky clean Mitt Romney
must show hes not the teen bully critics now say he was,
if he hopes to limit the damage from a published report
on his prep school days that paints him
as a cruel and possibly homophobic prankster
who once pinned a vulnerable schoolmate down
and cut his bleached-blond locks
Republican consultant John Feehery called
the Washington Post report troubling
for Romneys presidential bid....
For independents, its a troubling story.
... They dont like bullies, and anti-bullying has
become a issue on the national stage,
In the context of a close election,
little things like this can matter,
Romney, in a hastily arranged radio interview yesterday,
..... said he did not remember the alleged Lauber incident.
I participated in a lot of hijinks and pranks
during high school and some may have gone too far...."
Romney told Fox News Brian Kilmeade.
Some of Romneys prep-school pals
said they were stunned by the Post report."
(Excerpt) Read more at bostonherald.com ...
"Well Son, I stuck to my "PRINCIPLES" and stayed home!"
"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free."
One difference is this; most of us would change or at least forget our high school experience because we have become better more mature people since then. The Kenyan revels in his victimhood and hasn’t matured a bit since then. He has a coterie of sycophants who feed his needy ego and tell him how brilliant he is. He uses the first person singular more than most 5 year-olds. Most damning is he sees nothing wrong with this.
Oh, and BTW, should I link to some of my posts so far this year bashing Mitt?
Care to retract your utterly idiotic claim?
"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party
over to the traitors in the battle just ended.
We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged
to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support.
Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates
wouldnt make any sense at all.""
-- President Ronald Reagan
"I'm not running as the Republican view or a continuation of Republican values.
That's not what brings me to the race.
(Romney Video, accessed 9/19/07)
Sorry: for every Romney issue, far worse is already sitting in the People’s house and MUST be removed. The fact that this poorly written and poorly researched article about some “bullying” bs incident in freakin high school 50 years ago even comes up is ridiculous.
Much as I wish there were a more conservative candidate selected, there is NO viable alternative. Not now. last November and December? Yeah...thats when this crap should have happened. But it didn’t or it didn’t take.
Its not about compromising principles its not about anything else. Its about removing the marxist fascist and ALL of his dingleberrys from our government. Romney is the one who has to do it.
I will worry about the sins of Romney later...after the “bigger” disaster is removed.
[shrug]There is no other way: we cannot survive another 4 years of the sob we have now and his insane clown posse.
Once again, should I link to my FR posts this year critical of Romney?
And I defy you to show anywhere I have actually said anything supportive of him.
However, I also do not believe conservatives should co-opt liberal hatchet jobs, no matter what we believe of the target in question. One can point out the rank hypocrisy of this attack without being a slave to Romney.
What a crass politician, knee jerking...
He basically admitted to something he probably did not even do.
That’s going to fly real well, not.
Political gloating aside, however, isn’t it obvious that Obama’s gay politics is stemmed in hate and evil selfishness?
THis is about independenting men from caring and giving a choice to women of mates. This is about turning women into the hell hole that lesbianism is. This is a game of dictatorship, one for me, one for you, and evil little crumbs of power to little witches, even if for bigger witches.
Alea Jacta Est, let the feminist embrace their own destructions.
ANd as for Romney, he is an idiot.
Actually...if you go to The Obama Files...there is a LOT of info there on his early life...and especially college life. All this talk here that there is no one that remembers him...etc...is fiction. There are a LOT of people that remember him...and it's all documented.
In in the case of Obama...the truth is BETTER than fiction. Many of them talk about how self-absorbed he was...how arrogant. They talk about his dealings with Marxist professors in college. There are interviews with people who worked with him at BI that testify about how he lied in "dreams." There are pictures from his high school yearbook. There are interviews with college roommates and with college friends. It's all there.
No....there is PLENTY of info out there about him that proves him to be the radical we know he is. Saying no one knows anything about him hides the truth...and allows HIM to hide. Matter of fact...I would guess that the reason his past is hidden is NOT because he appeared out of no where...but because THEY HID IT to hide the truth of who he is.
What’s ironic even if we were to pretend for purposes of discussion, the story were 100% accurate (which the family disputes)
I would bet good money, that the misfit encountering peer pressure and having his freak hairdo cut like any normal person, was PRECISELY why his parents sent him to an exclusive prep school, to have happen.
The parents almost certainly wanted that. It’s why he ended up there. Back then, it was either than, or the Army.
I would go further, and bet they gave him that exact choice.
They very likely sent him there, because they did not know how to handle him, and wanted their son to be normal.
The GOP-E thought it made itself immune from Democrates by getting Romney in, or they are in complete tack with the progressist agenda for cheap rotten dollars of marketing.
Money was meant so we would be respected from having to reinvent the wheel when born. To honor that these things were given to us and not invented by us, as some atheist crazies seem to think we somehow survived out of the jungle and conquered by hybridization or something.
Thus money is nowadays debauched for “happy gay” products that liberals whore out for RINO CEOs, and this dance of hate is going to go on to its ridiculous levels of utter destruction in pride.
The point is Obama was protected and benefited from heterosexuality just like any woman was to “profit” from a cohort of heterosexual men ready to compete and build gold bridges for them. Now that Obama is in power, it is easy for him to tell the rest of AMerica, liberal or not, to play by the gay-begging rule of misery, without the perks that he benefited from, silver spoon in his mouth.
THIS IS THE WHOLE “SILVER SPOON IN MOUTH HYPOCRISY”, because Zero had one, and Romney or other in their heterosexuality PROTECTED THAT PRIVILEDGE OF HIS SO HE COULD RISE UP.
Now, like a selfish little muslim marxistoidated fool, he takes it from us.
AMERICA! OBAMA! THE JOKE IS ON YOU!!!!
In your fevered rut, you seem damn hot to extinguish freedom in one generation.
You’d swear some of these folks are on the Obama payroll with their attacks.
It’s absolutely reprehsible. Non-stop... Sick really
A brilliant idea. Let's get the bright, shining light of truth on Obama's background once and for all.
For all we know it wasn’t even a “fag” but... he was being weird. Long bleached hair. You aren’t born with that.
The press has left 'biased' and gone straight to 'surreal'.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.