Posted on 05/08/2012 9:53:18 AM PDT by Smokeyblue
Changes in the wording of Selective Service System record-keeping requirements, made days after the opening of an investigation into the alleged forgery of President Barack Obama’s selective service registration form, raise serious questions about U.S. Government intentions.
The new rules allow existing copies of documents that may be sought by investigators to be destroyed.
The Selective Service System’s new privacy rules were published in the Federal Register on Tuesday, September 20, 2011, four days after the September 16 announcement by World Net Daily that the Maricopa County (Arizona) Sheriff’s Office “Cold Case Posse” was opening an inquiry with full subpoena power into alleged forgery of several documents concerning Obama’s birth and draft registration.
The new rules, which constitute the first update to Selective Service System privacy regulations in eleven years, were published under the title, “Privacy Act of 1974; Publication of Notice of Systems of Records.”
Ongoing controversy surrounding allegations that some of Obama’s personal identification documents and records, including his Selective Service draft registration form, are forgeries came into sharp focus seven months ago. The “Cold Case Posse,” under the leadership of Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio, opened an inquiry in response to those allegations.
“This is a full-fledged criminal investigation,” Michael Zullo, lead investigator, told Communities @WashingtonTimes.
“Sheriff Arpaio sent two written requests in March to the Selective Service System requesting President Obama’s draft registration records. Selective Service System officials responded to Arpaio in writing, but did not turn over any of President Obama’s registration records.”
“We believe they are stonewalling,” Zullo added. "In their latest reply letter to the Sheriff, they do not comment on, or even allude to, the microfilm being available to inspect."
(Excerpt) Read more at communities.washingtontimes.com ...
Same with Social Security numbers by residence state and destroying passport and other gov records.
IMPORTANT MESSAGE
CHANGE TO PRE-1960 SELECTIVE SERVICE RECORDS REQUEST
National Archives and Records Administration has sole responsibility of ownership, storage, and retrieval of Selective Service records for men born before 1960. Consequently, Selective Service can no longer access any of these records.
All requests should be mailed directly to:
National Archives & Records Administration
National Archives at St. Louis
ATTN: RL-SL
P.O. Box 38757
St. Louis, MO 63138-0757
yea, nothing to see here...
of course, even a normal person with below average intelligence could spot this cover up
Nothing to see here ... because it was destroyed ...
Type in Obama for last name
Input SSN (not hyphens): 042684425
Input date of birth no slashes: 08041961
And voila you get the name Barack Hussein Obama and selective service # 61-1125539-1
I believe there is The People, and there is The Government.
“Battle lines being drawn . . . .” - and NOT drawn by The People.
I don't think this new Cashill article has been posted as a thread on FR. Nothing new, but it is a good review of the facts, and it updates Sheriff Joe's interest.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Among the unexpected findings of the Sheriff Arpaio cold case was this one:
"Records of Immigration and Naturalization Service cards filled out by airplane passengers arriving on international flights originating outside the United States in the month of August 1961, examined at the National Archives in Washington, D.C. are missing records for the week of President Obama's birth, including the dates Aug. 1, 1961 through Aug. 7, 1961."
Time for New Look at 2008 Obama Passport Breach By Jack Cashill, May 5, 2012
It is my understanding, also that the evidence of fraud isn’t just in the USPS “received” stamp. The upper right encoding does not follow SS guidance in effect at that time.
One glaring error is that the first 2 digits should be the same as the last two digits of the year of registration. In Obamugabe’s case, that would meen the registration card code should start with ^80^. Since it begins with an ^08^, his card was part of a batch of cards that was intended to be used on either 1908 or 2008.
I’m thinking that the CCP knows this and is withholding to trump the butt-lackey press.
At the risk of repeating myself:
What new rule?
Which Department issued the new rule?
Which Office in that Department issued that new rule?
Which person in that Office in that Department issued the new rule?
Who authorized the new rule?
Which Cogressional Committee is investigating that new rule?
WHY AM NOT SURPRSED AT THE ASWERS?
The onus is on the individual to prove him/her-self up to meet the qualifications set by the government (employer)...not the other way around. This jackwad gets away with it. Let’s see how many records these scumbags destroyed and the effect on future requirements to be met. They may have over cleaned.
Might start your search with the Federal Register.
From the article:
The Selective Service System’s new privacy rules were published in the Federal Register on Tuesday, September 20, 2011
Previously unnoticed, the new rules allow the government to destroy microfilm copies of Selective Service registration records and may create new obstacles for law enforcement agencies that are requesting records access for investigative purposes.
Article, then # 17 , # 23.
Thanks, Smokeyblue. Too late 0hbummer, we already know.
Criminal....
Everything about this guy is phony.
We have a tyranny run by federal employees who make up smack any time and way they want and their “rules and regulations” are all of a sudden federal law. No votes, no sunlight, nothing. Just all of a sudden “voila! New laws! We can do whatever we want and you (and Congress) have no say!”
They had their revolution and no one has noticed (well, here on FR some have).
Except that he’s stupid, evil, commie, muzzie lover, ilegal and a sex pervert.
Never a doubt. Bad people = bad government.
The stamp says July 29. The date signed says July 30. Was there time travel involved?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.