Santorum endorses one-time rival Romney

Associated Press ^ | May 7, 2012

[Free ThinkerNY]

WASHINGTON (AP) — Rick Santorum is endorsing his one-time bitter rival Mitt Romney in a late-night e-mail to his supporters.

Santorum on Monday urged his supporters to join him in working with the effective Republican nominee to deny President Barack Obama a second term.

[ohioWfan]

When one repeatedly and deliberately says things that are not true, that is lying, caww. It's not just a 'word.' It's what's happened here.

And we are ALL sinners. (I'm pretty sure you understand that).

That is why I am leaving this thread. I am a sinner, and the temptation to lash back at those who continue to deliberately misconstrue the truth, or defend those mistruths, has become too great.

[svcw]

Validation again, thanks.
You have not sinned against me, there is nothing to forgive.

[ohioWfan]

You have not sinned against me, there is nothing to forgive.

Good. Thank you.

I wish I could say the reverse is true.

(I really don't like being lied about).

I'll check back a long time later to see if you understand what you've done.

If not, please don't post to me again.

(I really, really don't like being lied about).

[caww]

My gosh...once again this dialogue has showing clearly that when you side with the enemy it will change you....always. But they never see it themselves as it takes hold.

Another reason I will not be voting for Romney....if one does so they soon will be supporting him in other ways and then they’ll be cheering him on....it’s a “Progressive” thing.

[svcw]

Seriously?
Are you going to slap my hand next?
Do I need to go to my room and think about it?
What I don’t get desert tonight?

[caww]

*

[svcw]

It is amazing, isn’t it.
I think I need to go to the time out chair and just wait till the timer goes off, so I understand what I have done.
(eye roll)
Oh well.
Keep up the good work.
You are correct, I will not vote for a liberal even if they define themselves as Republicans, been there done that - never again.

[CatherineofAragon]

Wait until the convention, when Romney gives a pretty speech and not everyone on FR falls in line behind him then. It’s really going to ramp up.

Such is life!

[svcw]

Yep. Hold on, conservatives will be in for quite a ride the next months.
;-)

[caww]

Yes, that will happen......and that line is going to be increasing as this moves along. It’s happening now as the Piper Pipes. ...read someones post they’re now fully in Romneys court...of all things after a single speech.

Since when do we believe anything Romney says? They have indeed taken the bait and more...jumped into the boat!

[caww]

It actually is understandable....just look at Sanatorium’s ‘behavior’ of late...He met with Romney..agreed together for whatever, (Note the word agreed).....and then what does Santorum do?....A typical Mormon thing.....he send’s an e-mail in the late hour of the night to announce he's endorsing Romney.............He agreed with evil and then the process of that changing one begins....small things at first and then it does progress.

We see this on the threads as well...as posters supporting Romney get mouthier and loose the ability to rightly support their position...they lash out...and then question themselves for doing so....it becomes a thing of confusion inwardly.

[unkus]

{You’re good}.

[CatherineofAragon]

The man is a serial liar. He lied about his own NAME at one of the debates. I would have trouble ever believing anything out of his mouth.

Just a day or so ago, I saw someone say they would vote for a devoted Satanist to get Obama out. That chilled me like nothing I’ve seen posted on this issue.

[SoConPubbie]

In addition, if the tone of those postings, which is ridiculing, mocking, and demeaning is what you would call “fair,” then you and I have a different definition of the word, and if that is your definition, then there really is not much more to say on the matter between us other than simply leave you with this:

Well Jeff, as with every discussion and debate, there is always two sides of the story, both in terms of perceptions and the facts and opinions offered.

And while I would agree with you that at times, there are some unnecessary statements from BOTH sides of this on-going discussion, I, as well as you, the participients of this discussion, and those just reading through the threads can look past the unnecessary comments.

That having been said, why would a church, supposedly speaking for God and started by a founder who loudly and proudly proclaimed that all other Christian sects were, and I am paraphrasing because I cannot remember the exact words of Joseph Smith right now, basically damned? or completely wrong, have to change so many of their teachings over the years?

Christianity, based on the Bible, has not changed.

Yet Mormonism, started by a so-called "Prophet" with a "Vision" from Moroni, is supposed to accurately reflect the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

[svcw]

Romney is a liar, pro abortion, pro homosexual agenda, pro gun grab, pro big government, pro government mandate, pro welfare.......BHO white.
As you, I will not vote for another liberal, even if they self identity themselves as Republican - I am done - never again.
If I was capable of photo hopping, I would stick Romney’s picture on the image of the move poster Idiocracy.
;-)

[Elsie]

And don't start screaming that you're a better Christian because you hate people of other faiths more than I do.

Now why would I do that?

If you do not wish to confront false teachings in a public forum; that is your choice.

I, however, do.

Evidently I am not doing it in the 'correct' manner'.

[Elsie]

A new sign on who exhibits irrational hatred for Romney is likely an Obama troll.

Oh?

Says who?

What is the difference between irrational hatred for Romney and a ration revulsion against the false teachungs the he publically admits to believeing in?

[Elsie]

A new sign on who exhibits irrational hatred for Romney is likely an Obama troll.

Oh?

Says who?

What is the difference between irrational hatred for Romney and a rational revulsion against the false teachungs the he publically admits to believeing in?

[Elsie]

...your desperate attempt in your last post to me...

What criteria do you use when judging me to be desparate?

[Elsie]

I am not 'personally attacking' anyone for exposing false teachings.

But, you must admit, that you do a damned good job of ACCUSING folks to be Obama trolls!