Posted on 05/05/2012 9:22:37 AM PDT by TsonicTsunami08
A United Nations investigator probing discrimination against Native Americans has called on the US government to return some of the land stolen from Indian tribes as a step toward combatting continuing and systemic racial discrimination. James Anaya, the UN special rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples, said no member of the US Congress would meet him as he investigated the part played by the government in the considerable difficulties faced by Indian tribes.
(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...
“I think we should give it back also and then they push the UN building right into the East River. “
Yep. Most liberal strongholds are cities. Propose to make Manhattan, or DC, or Chicago a gift back to the Indians. Let’s see if liberals are willing to sacrifice for their ideology.
Heck, lets give them NYC, Boston,Chicago, Philladelphia, Detroit, LA, and San Fran. That ought to do it!! Oh yes and all of Vermont!!
Now we knosw why Elizabeth Warren was claiming to be part Indian she knew this crap was coming down.
Opps forgot DC, how about All of OR, and Wash St. too!
Not in Texas!
Nobama knows there are many here who are prepared to fight again like the Alamo.
Now if somehow nobama re-wins and the dems regain House and Senate majorities, the rest of you all will deserve whatever you are willing to put up with.
She can give them Cambridge,Newton,and Brookline.(And I live in one of them)
My advice to all Injuns: assimilate, or go extinct.
My advice to the UN: go extinct.
Which Turtle Bay?
“——they are silent on member states that are commiting wholesale murder against racial minorities as I type this response.”
—
Yup! I wonder of they’ve checked out Zimbabwe recently?
After they pay all their parking tickets.
To the UN: Yeah, Right after all the Arab nations return all the land belonging to Israel!!!!
The white people called them blood thirsty, godless savages among other things and decided to tame them with guns and bibles, put them in concentration camps "for their own protection" while they took their lands and opened them up to white settlers. Now here is the difference: If indeed the Indians were godless blood thirsty savages and killing their neighbors for land and dominance, that was a way of life that they always knew WHEREAS the White man was civilized , had God and supposedly a moral civilization. The conclusion to me is the White sin was a thousand times worse than what the Indians have always done in time immemorial.
When Lewis and Clark found the Sioux living on the middle reaches of the Missouri River, it was because the Ojibway were sitting on the ancestral Sioux lands north of the Great Lakes, having driven the Sioux out to starve. They would have, too, except for their discovery of the horse and the High Plains buffalo herds.
1. England owes Scotland and Ireland;
2. Romans owe the known world of the time;
3. Egyptians owe the Israelites (Jews);
4. England owes just about everyone during its reign;
5. Germany owes much of Europe, USA, parts of Africa, and Russia;
6. Japan owes much of Asia and the USA;
7. Persia owes Greece;
8. Mongols owe central Asia and eastern Europe;
9. France owes Britain and much of Europe;
10. Spain owes the Aztecs and parts of Europe;
11. Apaches owe the Navajos.
12. Navajo owe the Sioux;
13. Sioux owe the Cherokee and take it east...
14. Mexico owes indian natives;
15. Russia owes countries of the Soviet Bloc;
16. China owes parts of Asia;
17. Ottoman Empire owes central Asia and eastern Europe;
18. Eastern Europe owes each other;
19. Vikings owe Newfoundland and parts of Scandinavia;
20. Many African nations owe each other;
21. Many European nations owe African nations;
22. Italians owe the Allied countries;
23. Middle East nations owe each other;
Really? How far back do we have to go? When homo sapiens left their caves to fight with other homo sapiens? At what point to we declare that conquest is over and the lines of nations are now drawn and live with it (except for the rare few)?
I want something!
LOL! I hadn't heard that one. God, don't tell Russel Means! He'll be furious!
Talk about getting things off to a good start .....
Bwahahaha! I agree!
Much of what you describe are actions carried out by the Federal Gooberment and a range of self-serving politicians. The reservation system? Thank Uncle Fed for that. Trail of Tears? Thank that genocidal fascist Andrew Jackson. Even now, the Feds treat American Indians like children.
If you think the Comanche suffered overmuch at the hands of the Scots-Irish, perhaps you should read what the Scots-Irish had done to the Irish. As the saying went, when the Scots-Irish first landed in Ireland, "They fell on their knees and prayed to God. Then they fell on the natives, and preyed on them."
You argue that the Red men did as they had always done. So did the white man -- ask anyone who teaches European and Asian history. Ask any Zulu, ask any Turk or Arab. Siege of Acre, anyone? -- that was pretty stringent. Or are we just talking massacres? Five or six in Ireland alone, in a 600-year span ending 250 years ago. Which is about when the "puttings down" in Scotland, by the English, ended. And don't forget the hundreds of thousands of Cypriot pagans put to death by the Arabs in the 9th century, or the millions of Hindus killed by the caliphs and sharifs. Your average Arab imam or sharif wouldn't even get out of bed on a day when he didn't feel up to killing 20,000 Hindus.
Depends on the tirbes in question, no? Some tribes were focused on agriculture and inhabited a fixed area. Some tribes were very nomadic. Some peaceful and some would make scare the crap out of a Conquistador. There is a big difference between, for example, the Zuni and the Comanche. One can no more lump together all American Indians any more than one can lump together all Europeans.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.