Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Robinson; struggle; DTogo; old school; Jeff Head; KeyLargo; rogue yam; The_Reader_David; ...
Assuming Romney becomes the (R) nominee, he will need to coalesce the base. He must do this convincingly for conservatives and Tea Party to get on board full throttle, not just halfheartedly.

How many of us were enthusiastic about Reagan in 1980 but thought the "Rockefeller Wing" was going to sabotage our chances when he selected GHWBush as his VP? How many of us were somewhat enthusiastic about Quayle, but not so much about GHWBush in 1988? How many of us were enthusiastic about Kemp, not so enthusiastic about Dole in 1996? How many of us were only cautiously supportive of GWBush in 2000, but roared when we learned he'd selected Cheney as his VP?

How does Romney get us ALL on board? Here's a suggestion:

Run not only with your VP but with your proposed cabinet as well.

Conservatives sometimes have to be reminded that a President is not king. He can't get anything done by dictate. Above all, he must be a quarterback for the team. While a quarterback may sometimes run a ball in to the end zone himself, more often than not he strategically uses the talents of his team mates to move the ball down the field and bring about the win.

Did anyone hear Palin the other night (4/12/2012) on Hannity when asked if she'd consider being Sec'y of Energy? Did you watch her show the following night in place of Greta? Did anyone hear our own FReeper Allen West when interviewed on Hannity (4/11/2012) and asked whether he'd consider being Romney's VP? And BOTH essentially said YES!

Newt has effectively conceded. Are any of these folks any less conservative for facing what are becoming our realities this election cycle?

I have proposed cabinet and administration roles for persons who were Romney's rivals at some point. These are the skill sets we conservatives wanted applied to the places of government where they'd be most effective. Instead of rivals let's make them team players:

Rick Santorum - Sec'y of HHS

Sarah Palin - Sec'y of Energy + Sec'y of Interior (merge these)

Newt Gingrich - Sec'y of Education

Michelle Bachmann - Attorney General

Herman Cain - Sec'y of Commerce, HUD, and Head of GSA (merge)

John Bolton - Sec'y of State

John Petraeus - Sec'y of Defense

Tim Pawlenty: Sec’y of Transportation Ron Paul - Head of Federal Reserve (let the audit begin)

Donald Trump - Head Council of Economic Advisers

Paul Ryan - Head of Office of Management and Budget

Joe Arpaio - Head of FBI, and Homeland Security (merge these)

Dick Cheney - Head of CIA

White House spokesman: Mike Huckabee 1st Supreme Court nominee: Mark Levin

2nd Supreme Court nominee: Ann Coulter

And our own FReeper, Allen West, as VP.

I was a Perry guy. Keep him as Governor of Texas. He's doing fine right where he is.

Next: Most of these folks are honed primed and stoked from the recent primary debates. They're all sharp. Nationalize the cabinet selection process as much as the Presidential and Congressional elections.

Release every one of these folks back out onto the campaign trail with an assignment: tackle in an "in your face" way each of these departments - stage a kick-off news conference in front of each one of them in DC. Challenge the office holders to the equivalent of Lincoln-Douglas style debates allowing each Obama appointed office member to defend their record and their (mis)-management of their public trust.

They won't debate, you say? OK, try some new Rules for Conservative Radicals. Stalk them, dog them with cameras, "Breitbart" them, shame them into the arena, watch the cowards avoid the heat, watch for and exploit their mis-steps, create and run ads based on their failures in office and refusal to be made accountable.

While this is distracting the DNCs resources, Romney can land his own punches on Obama in the same way he's managed to blow away all his opposition in the primaries. Use Romney's well funded strike teams to confound opposition at the grass roots, do what they can to discourage and depress Democratic opposition and their voters.

Face it: if Romney was able to take out his competitors in the primary don't you suppose Obama's hacks could have taken anyone of them out in the general?

Have Romney's boys sew the seeds of hopelessness and dissension in the Obama ranks, cut 'em off at the knees, emphasize betrayal and failure of Obama to keep 2008 promises. Undermine, destroy and confound the opposition into a confused, ill-directed mass. They'll find themselves fighting on more than one Alinskyized, freeze-the-target candidate -- not just a single Presidential candidate, and instead they'll be spending their resources fighting 15+ personalities "running" for cabinet offices AND the Presidency!

Who are the DNC’s "generals" they have to call into a fight like that?

Instead of dividing us with all the endless sniping, let's quit doing the DNC's work for them and work on dividing THEM for a change!

Romney and Netanyahu both began strategic business careers at Boston Consulting Group. Agree with them or disagree with them, but admit that they are patient, long range, strategic thinkers.

One of the things Romney has been able to do in large part is to keep his persona distanced from the decisively well-calculated positioning of opposition to rivals in the primaries. His name-less, face-less cloaked "hit-men" are as effective as any guerrilla force out there, but all that activity is maintained at a plausibly deniable, comfortable, arms-length distance from Romney the candidate. I dare say it puts the likes of Nixon's and Clinton's "opposition research" squads to shame.

Sorry George. Enough of the "kinder-gentler" crap. Tight formations, and "gentlemen's wars" provided the fixed targets that let us destroy the British in our War of Independence.

I can see that machine going to work on Obama and leaving more than just a few lumps. Let's turn the "talents" of Romney's henchmen on to Obama, keep them disciplined, focused, and this side of doing any thing "Watergate," and let them go for the DNC's jugular.

If Romney is what we've got to work with this time around let's face that fact head on and let's hold his feet to the fire and make our will known as conservatives. If he's smart he'll seek our trust, and appoint many of our cabinet choices. To secure our trust he's going to have to both earn it and maintain it.

Romney will go a long and convincing way to doing that by arming, deputizing, and funding the campaign efforts of his "cabinet-in-waiting."

FReegards!


1,417 posted on 05/06/2012 8:07:02 PM PDT by Agamemnon (Darwinism is the glue that holds liberalism together)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Agamemnon

Bolton is already on board.


1,418 posted on 05/06/2012 8:13:35 PM PDT by TheRhinelander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1417 | View Replies ]

To: Agamemnon

Man, that line up would cause mass apoplexy amongst liberals. I would LOVE to see it—well, both, the line up and the apoplexy.


1,420 posted on 05/06/2012 8:21:25 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1417 | View Replies ]

To: Agamemnon

Interesting concept, but better to keep Gingrich out of daily responsibilities. He does not play well with the other chldren.

Keep him rather as Chief of Bright Ideas, sort of a Minister Without Portfolio, a J.E.B. Stuart, Patton, to throw into the fight were needed.


1,422 posted on 05/06/2012 8:38:34 PM PDT by MindBender26 (America can survive 4 years of Romney. She cannot survive another 4 years of an unfettered Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1417 | View Replies ]

To: Agamemnon

Wow... much thoguht went into that Agamemnon....I do think we may be seeing a dog fight ahead....if not then it’s definately fixed for Obama to win.


1,429 posted on 05/06/2012 10:15:29 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1417 | View Replies ]

To: Agamemnon

Awesome Lineup!
Thank You for your research and excellent thinking!


1,436 posted on 05/07/2012 4:24:15 AM PDT by left that other site
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1417 | View Replies ]

To: Agamemnon

BRILLIANT!


1,441 posted on 05/07/2012 6:23:57 AM PDT by Savage Beast ("You can, in fact must, shout fire in a crowded theatre. It just has to be the truth. " J. Goldberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1417 | View Replies ]

To: Agamemnon; Jim Robinson; struggle; DTogo; old school; Jeff Head; KeyLargo; rogue yam

So sad to see so many good people fall into Bo’s divide the opposition, conquer, and divide to win. If BO wins, there will be zero opportunity for conservatives for decades, if not more, to come. Bo will consolidate power, persecute all opponents, use his media to consolidate message control, and outlaw many of his opponents voices and activities. In short, there won’t be another chance for any conservative or even a rino like romney. Look at the example of Newt—he had a huge bounce, then the relentless smear campaign from Bo’s old media destroyed him. Mark my words, there will be NO SECOND CHANCE. Bo will stack the court and what he can’t get away with by exec decree, he will use judicial tyranny to exact his toll on our kids’ futures.


1,446 posted on 05/07/2012 7:12:25 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarmed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1417 | View Replies ]

To: Agamemnon; Jim Robinson; struggle; DTogo; old school; Jeff Head; KeyLargo; rogue yam; ...

Agamemnon,

I certainly agree with you on this. If Romney would do this, he could actually win with a landslide and have a real mandate. However, I don’t think this will ever happen, since he’s now moving more to the center and away from his false conservatism he espoused during the primary battles.

I think the election results will be close, and if Romney actually wins, he won’t have any kind of mandate and he will govern from the center and follow any which way the wind blows.

I think our only hope is to make Congress more conservative by electing the right conservatives in both houses.


1,447 posted on 05/07/2012 7:17:39 AM PDT by Real Cynic No More (OBAMA!!'s name is all caps as sarcasm to indicate a lack of respect, as he does not deserve it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1417 | View Replies ]

To: Agamemnon
With all due respect, I think this cabinet lineup would assure Romney's defeat. Palin, Coulter, Cheney and a few others are favorite targets of the MSM. In Cheney's case the ability to capitalize on his "Darth Vader" image and make him frightening as the CIA Director could be devastating. Whether Romney should give private assurances to conservative leaders is another matter - I have no problem with exacting every conservative appointment possible as a price for support. But that is my opinion and is mainly based on election tactics (although I don't think Coulter or Levin are remotely qualified for the Court (is Borkh too old at this point?) Let the Dems attack him and lets allow the public to compare his opinions to those written by Kagan and Sotomayor. Is there another Scalia on the horizon?

Meantime, we need to try to force the election to be about Obama's record - cause there ain't no there, there.

1,453 posted on 05/07/2012 8:53:30 AM PDT by In Maryland (Liberal logic - the ultimate oxymoron!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1417 | View Replies ]

To: Agamemnon
Ann Coulter is still on Double-Secret Probation.

Suggest Mark Levin.

1,456 posted on 05/07/2012 10:05:03 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1417 | View Replies ]

To: Agamemnon

This is great thinking and strategy. If Romney did this I would think twice about voting for him. Unfortunately, asking Mittens to coalesce with real Conservatives is like asking water to run uphill. I’ll wait until I see it.


1,470 posted on 05/07/2012 4:02:23 PM PDT by APatientMan (Pick a side)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1417 | View Replies ]

To: Agamemnon
OK - I like your plan in terms of practicality, very strong approach, in fact, I love it. ;-)

Of course, with my plan we end up with Sarah Palin as president but yours is good too. ;-)

1,475 posted on 05/07/2012 5:46:35 PM PDT by Tunehead54 (Nothing funny here ;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1417 | View Replies ]

To: Agamemnon

With you (almost)entirely. I think it is a terrific idea to run with everyone on board ( like your slate except for Tim Pawlenty, too much of a wienie for me)and the IN YOUR FACE thing is what we need.


1,499 posted on 05/09/2012 7:04:49 AM PDT by Bainbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1417 | View Replies ]

To: Agamemnon

Thank you for the ping.


1,502 posted on 05/09/2012 8:45:37 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1417 | View Replies ]

To: Agamemnon

Well said!


1,513 posted on 05/12/2012 4:20:12 AM PDT by CanuckYank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1417 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson