Skip to comments.
Ron Paul Vows To Stay In 2012 Race. Untill all votes are Counted. [May not endorse Mitt]
Daily Paul ^
| April 30, 2012
Posted on 05/01/2012 7:40:27 AM PDT by greyfoxx39
The libertarian, who is experiencing surge of support in delegates, made the statement after going head-to-head with Nobel Prize-winning economist -- and ideological opposite -- Paul Krugman in a debate about the U.S. economy.
"Depends on what his platform is going to be," he said in an interview with Bloomberg's "Street Smart." "If every single thing in the platform I disagree with, it's gonna be tough [to endorse him (Romney)] . If it's 100 percent opposite of everything I've said on civil liberties, on war issues, on spending cuts, on monetary policy, what could I do?"
He continued: "We have millions of people now supporting our campaign, and millions that haven't been heard of because they are independents and Democrats that aren't happy with Obama...
Continue:
http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/335252/20120430/ron-paul-vow...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections; noaboforme; romney; ronpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
See around 20:00 of video.
To: greyfoxx39
Ron Paul is good on some issues but is absolutely out of his friggin mind on at least one...Iran having a nuke.That position alone warrants his being admitted,against his will,to a locked psychiatric ward.
2
posted on
05/01/2012 7:48:24 AM PDT
by
Gay State Conservative
(Unlike Mrs Obama,I've Been Proud Of This Country My *Entire* Life!)
To: greyfoxx39
In the meantime, his minions (or faux grass roots as the case may be), are slithering NOW to accumulate delegates to Tampa, in the name of "Blue Republicans" (
here and
here. By even their definition, a group of Democrats and Unenrolled, temporary for "one year" republicans, setting up to rabble rouse and OWS'ize the convention.
3
posted on
05/01/2012 7:49:29 AM PDT
by
C210N
(Go Newt!)
To: greyfoxx39
I do agree in this sense, how after months and months of trying to convince people that the other guy is a scab on the buttocks of the earth, then turn around and endorse them as the best guy possible if you lose.
Paul has no chance but if he stays in he is raking in the $$$ for his retirement coffers.
4
posted on
05/01/2012 7:50:06 AM PDT
by
svcw
(If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
To: C210N
In the meantime, his minions (or faux grass roots as the case may be), are slithering NOW to accumulate delegates to Tampa, in the name of "Blue Republicans"Why do you care one way or the other unless you are a Romney supporter?
5
posted on
05/01/2012 7:59:09 AM PDT
by
JimWayne
To: Jim Robinson; SoConPubbie; onyx
6
posted on
05/01/2012 8:00:24 AM PDT
by
greyfoxx39
(The epitome of stupidity is a member of a proven racist sect running against a black man.)
To: greyfoxx39
Why should he endorse Romney?
Like he said, what do he and Romney have in common politically? Virtually nothing. The fact that Obama doesn’t either is no reason to endorse him just because he has an R after his name.
The Republican party depends too heavily on people just blindly endorsing someone because they have an R after their name. That’s not good enough.
7
posted on
05/01/2012 8:06:33 AM PDT
by
Lorianne
(fedgov, taxporkmoney)
To: JimWayne
I am a Newt supporter, and usually refer to that guy as “Rotney”. That said, the republican party has to be fixed, and I do not believe it must be broken further by the likes of democrats in republican clothing doing dirty work in Tampa.
Rotney will be doing enough damage as it is; however presuming no magic in the next few months vis-a-vis a Newt or Palin, I’m ABO (”I’ll vote for the contents of my septic tank rather than zer0”).
8
posted on
05/01/2012 8:06:55 AM PDT
by
C210N
(Go Newt!)
To: greyfoxx39
9
posted on
05/01/2012 8:11:36 AM PDT
by
N. Theknow
(Kennedys=Can't drive, can't ski, can't fly, can't skipper a boat, but they know what's best for you.)
To: C210N
Ill vote for the contents of my septic tank rather than zer0Great line! Mind if I use it as my tagline?
10
posted on
05/01/2012 8:15:59 AM PDT
by
Gay State Conservative
(Unlike Mrs Obama,I've Been Proud Of This Country My *Entire* Life!)
To: svcw
Paul has no chance but if he stays in he is raking in the $$$ for his retirement coffers.Maybe, but if Newt drops out, Paul will be the only counter balance to Romney's rabid Socialism.
Paul got 1/4 of the caucus vote in North Dakota, behind Santorum's 40%.
11
posted on
05/01/2012 8:21:46 AM PDT
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
To: C210N
You cannot fix it without breaking it apart completely. If someone else is doing the work for you, let them do it and throw out the crooks. The best strategy is to support freedom loving candidates for Congress and the Senate and help anyone who wants to break the stranglehold of the Karl Rove Republicans on the GOP.
Remember how they ganged up with the Dims and attacked Herman Cain? I do not see why we should foolishly support them and strengthen their hands.
Of the two candidates at this point, one will strengthen the American economy but do nothing about foreign enemies, while the other will destroy the American economy and spend a lot of money on foreign affairs by constructing new buildings for diplomates and by giving aid to leftist NGOs for awareness campaigns in foreign nations.
On social affairs, one has a relaxed policy on drugs while the other supports baby-killing.
For whatever reason, many conservatives seem to be more repulsed by the lax policy on drugs and ignorance of foreign enemies than by the combination of baby-killing and socialism. They seem to be able to grit their teeth and tolerate baby-killing and socialism but don't seem to be able to grit their teeth and tolerate a lax policy on drugs and choking of funds to foreign citizens and leftist NGOs even if that is in exchange for a strong economic policy.
I supported Sarah Palin, Herman Cain and Michel Bachmann, and Newt to a limited extent. Now I am okay with anyone destroying the establishment's grip on GOP and setting the stage for someone new to take over the party. I don't care if the Dims do it or if Ron Paul does it.
12
posted on
05/01/2012 8:26:11 AM PDT
by
JimWayne
To: C210N
(Ill vote for the contents of my septic tank rather than zer0).
So would I.
I would also vote for the contents of medical waste drums in all the Massachusetts abortuaries before I would vote for Bishop Willard.
13
posted on
05/01/2012 8:30:15 AM PDT
by
Psalm 144
(Obama's record is an open charnel pit. Romney's too, but under a whitened sepulchre.)
To: JimWayne
“For whatever reason, many conservatives seem to be more repulsed by the lax policy on drugs and ignorance of foreign enemies than by the combination of baby-killing and socialism.”
Margaret Sanger lives.
14
posted on
05/01/2012 8:33:09 AM PDT
by
Psalm 144
(Obama's record is an open charnel pit. Romney's too, but under a whitened sepulchre.)
To: Psalm 144
I share most of your sentiment... and currently see things as a conundrum; an enigma of a situation.
15
posted on
05/01/2012 8:33:41 AM PDT
by
C210N
(Go Newt!)
To: greyfoxx39
Saw this debate earlier this AM enjoyed it. Paul did quite well I thought.
16
posted on
05/01/2012 8:42:35 AM PDT
by
jpsb
To: Psalm 144
I would also vote for the contents of medical waste drums in all the Massachusetts abortuaries before I would vote for Bishop Willard.Amen!
17
posted on
05/01/2012 8:42:44 AM PDT
by
greyfoxx39
(The epitome of stupidity is a member of a proven racist sect running against a black man.)
To: greyfoxx39
I don’t really want Doctor Paul, but he is preferable to Romney the socialist RINO.
18
posted on
05/01/2012 8:53:36 AM PDT
by
BuffaloJack
(End Obama's War On Freedom.)
To: Psalm 144
No, that describes the policies of the two candidates remaining in the race and those who support Mitt Romney at this stage of the race. If you support either of them, you support their policies. If you do not agree with me, go ahead and describe their policies.
19
posted on
05/01/2012 9:05:00 AM PDT
by
JimWayne
To: greyfoxx39
Paul says “what could I do?”.
Do what I’m going to do. Don’t vote for Romney.
20
posted on
05/01/2012 9:07:44 AM PDT
by
ex-snook
("above all things, truth beareth away the victory")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson