Skip to comments.
Chaperones included in new Secret Service conduct rules
Associated Press ^
| 4/28/12
Posted on 04/29/2012 8:59:21 AM PDT by Justaham
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
1
posted on
04/29/2012 8:59:29 AM PDT
by
Justaham
To: Justaham
Kinda reminds one of high school trips to Europe. For the chaperons in this case...if they screw up....they get fired. So I’m guessing they will want everyone to be accounted for at a certain time, and everyone acts professional. Kind of sad to treat a bunch of thirty-five year old guys this way.
To: Justaham

if firing the guilty doesn't have the desired effect, what makes the chaperones more trustworthy than the supposedly most trustworthy agents in the whole government???
3
posted on
04/29/2012 9:05:55 AM PDT
by
Chode
(American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: Justaham
The Secret Service agents are the chaperones not needing one. This sounds like the beginnings of Mother Russia's position of political officer.
4
posted on
04/29/2012 9:07:53 AM PDT
by
Ophiucus
To: Justaham
The Secret Service is so childish they need “chaperons”?
5
posted on
04/29/2012 9:08:04 AM PDT
by
yldstrk
( My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: Justaham
So now the Secret Service is to be treated like a bunch of high school adolescents?
I feel so proud.
6
posted on
04/29/2012 9:09:37 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Government is the religion of the sociopath.)
To: Justaham
“Chaperones” for the Secret Services guys? ROTFL!!! We’ve fallen farther than I thought we had.
7
posted on
04/29/2012 9:09:53 AM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Dumb, dependent and Democrat is no way to go through life. - Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas)
To: Justaham
If we are now reduced to assigning chaperones to our SS agents I think its time to outsource the job of protecting the President. Gavin DeBecker springs to mind.
8
posted on
04/29/2012 9:12:30 AM PDT
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: yldstrk
I was going to suggest sending their mothers along with them but it looks like they didn’t do such a good job either.
Good grief. What are we coming to? Surely the end is near.
To: Justaham
Doesn’t 0bmama already have a road trip Czar?
10
posted on
04/29/2012 9:17:04 AM PDT
by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
To: Justaham
But who watches the watchers?
To: Justaham
Another of our institutions humbled. I no longer recognize the country I grew up in.
Chaperons. Is the no end to the humiliation? Yet, this is what happens when we become a silly country run by silly people.
12
posted on
04/29/2012 9:19:31 AM PDT
by
x1stcav
(There's a bunch of us out here spoiling for a fight.)
To: Justaham
The guys responsible for guarding the most powerful man in the world needs chaperons?? Aww. Shit.....
To: Justaham
When I was in the Air Force it was behave or you could be punished under article 133 actions unbecoming an airman
I think its time to bring the overseas government employees under that kind of law.
Behave or be fined up to a years pay and some jail time for good measure
14
posted on
04/29/2012 9:20:52 AM PDT
by
mouser
(Run the rats out its the only chance we have)
To: Justaham
Ehhhh.....it’s just the Democrats creating more government jobs and thus more taxpayer money being handed to Democrats.
15
posted on
04/29/2012 9:35:25 AM PDT
by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: Justaham
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
16
posted on
04/29/2012 9:36:49 AM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Justaham
The Secret Service is NOT VERY secret ANYMORE...
17
posted on
04/29/2012 9:44:20 AM PDT
by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
To: Justaham
What, no hideously expensive “counseling”, seminars in tropical locations, or mandated, taxpayer-funded educational programs run by talentless Communist academics?
18
posted on
04/29/2012 9:49:05 AM PDT
by
EyeGuy
(Non-Holder person.)
To: Justaham
“Chaperones included in new Secret Service conduct rules”
Just means that in the future, prostitutes will be on the government payroll and have the title of “chaperones.” It’s the new job title, replacing “escort” since that title has gained a derogatory meaning.
This will be done in order to avoid public disturbances regarding disputes of payment. The unionized chaperones will be required to accompany the SS (Secret Service) on all trips abroad!
To: Justaham
Regardless of what is really going on, if you have to assign chaperones to teams of secret service agents, you don’t have the right agents and the problems are institutional. This is a ridiculous layering of additional staff.
20
posted on
04/29/2012 9:57:59 AM PDT
by
Truth29
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson