Castle Doctrine. Yep. Just passed this year.
Watching the video it seems the Leftist journos reporting on this story seem a little angry and sad that the castle doctrine exists there and that the lady successfully used a firearm to defend herself against Holder’s people.
What amazes me about the libs is their ability to detach from what happens to other people. Like someone else’s wife and daughter being raped and murdered could never happen to them. How can they express sympathy for perps and little for victims.
I’m not sure this lady would need the castle dotrine to justify this shooting. I’m a prosecutor and a judge (Harvard educated but raised in Montana) once told me that most all defenses to criminal prosecutions are grounded in necessity. The test is “was it reasonable and was it necessary?”. The inquiry should end there.
Wow! We don’t get such blatantly biased reporting even here in blue PA.
I’m willing to let the guy who did the story off the hook here. Maybe he figures everybody in the state should know about the Castle Doctrine already and he’s tired of having to explain it every single time he does one of these kinds of story.