Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

College Group Told to Eliminate 'Personal Commitment to Jesus' in Bylaws
christianpost.com ^ | Alex Murashko

Posted on 04/27/2012 9:23:36 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2

A Christian student group at Vanderbilt University has been told by the school's administration that it will lose its recognized status on campus unless the group removes its requirement that its leaders have a "personal commitment to Jesus Christ," says a Christian legal association.

Despite a discussion with school officials at the beginning of the year that led members of the group to believe their bylaws were approved, the group was told last week that the university's new policy barring religious groups from selecting members and leaders based on faith requirements will disqualify the group next school year.

The Christian Legal Society told The Christian Post on Friday that the small Christian student group, which wants to stay anonymous, received an email from the administration last Tuesday that stated that the group's application to keep its recognition was deficient because the group's constitution states the following:

"Criteria for officer selection will include level and quality of past involvement, personal commitment to Jesus Christ, commitment to the organization, and demonstrated leadership ability."

CLS said that the student group was told that in order to retain recognition, it must eliminate the requirement that leaders have a "personal commitment to Jesus Christ." The private university, located in Nashville, Tenn., dictated that the following sentence be substituted instead:

"Criteria for officer selection will include level and quality of past involvement, commitment to the organization, and demonstrated leadership ability."

Although they do not want to bring attention to themselves, the issue with Christian organizations at Vanderbilt has become enough of a problem on campus that the group does want to let others know about the situation, said CLS spokesperson Kim Colby.

"When they went over their constitution on Jan. 31 they had been told that their constitution is fine. This past Tuesday, they were told it's not fine unless you take out these five words: 'a personal commitment to Jesus Christ,' requirement for your leaders," Colby told CP. "They were told they would not be recognized next year which means they cannot reserve space, or attend the student fair, or be a part of email blasts from the college."

Recently, Christian students at Vanderbilt University organized a video campaign highlighting their concern for the university's new policy that they say discriminates against Christians.

The nearly seven-minute video features several university students, alumni, and sponsors speaking on their rights to freely express their religious association, and the importance of electing religious leaders to the university's student run organizations.

The video also claims that there is a disparity in university requirements for Greek organizations and religious organizations, as the university allows Greek organization to "discriminate" for leadership and membership positions.

Students protesting the "all-comers" policy have formed the group Vanderbilt Solidarity, consisting of 11 Christian groups and supported by the Alliance Defense Fund.

The 11 Christian groups that have formed the alliance include Asian American Christian Fellowship, Fellowship of Christian Athletes, Cru, Medical Christian Fellowship, Navigators, Graduate Christian Fellowship, Bridges International, Lutheran Student Fellowship, Every Nation Ministries, Beta Upsilon Chi, and Christian Legal Society, according to Inside Vandy, Vanderbilt University's student newspaper.

Colby said that some Catholic student groups have decided not to try and reinstate themselves for next year and that some groups from the alliance have decided to comply with the university's new policy.

"By mandating the elimination of a Christian group's standard of 'personal commitment to Jesus Christ,' Vanderbilt requires students to abandon their religious integrity and undermines their religious freedoms," states CLS. "Leadership is crucial to the direction of any organization.

"Eliminating the requirement of a commitment to Jesus Christ in leaders takes away the group's ability to effectively fulfill its purpose and continue its ministry," CLS officials insisted. "By forcing religious groups to choose between remaining on campus and upholding their religious convictions, the university inhibits the development of a community based on freedom and inclusivity."

University officials continue to stand by the "all-comers" policy, arguing that the policy was initiated to prevent discrimination, and is not an issue of religious freedom.

"This debate is about nondiscrimination, not religious freedom, and we stand behind our policy," Beth Fortune, vice chancellor for public affairs at the university, previously told The Washington Post.

A comment from university officials about the administration's recent action could not be obtained at press time.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Philosophy; US: Tennessee
KEYWORDS: christophbia; christophobia; persecution; religiousfreedom; vanderbilt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: BillyBoy

Would you object to the University sanctioning a Calvinist Club that made allegiance to the WCF a requirement for membership? Is that too exclusive and discriminatory for you?


41 posted on 04/28/2012 1:09:18 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (Virgil Goode! Because everyone else is Bad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
>> Would you object to the University sanctioning a Calvinist Club that made allegiance to the WCF a requirement for membership? Is that too exclusive and discriminatory for you? <<

No, I have no problem with that. I'd likewise have no problem with the university sanctioning a Catholic Club that made allegiance to Pope Benedict XVI a requirement for membership.

I'd simply object to a "Christian" club making allegiance to the WCF a requirement for membership, for the same reasons you'd object to a "Christian" club that made allegiance to Pope Benedict XVI a requirement for membership.

42 posted on 04/28/2012 6:59:30 PM PDT by BillyBoy (Illegals for Perry/Gingrich 2012 : Don't be "heartless"/ Be "humane")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy; xzins
I'd simply object to a "Christian" club making allegiance to the WCF a requirement for membership, for the same reasons you'd object to a "Christian" club that made allegiance to Pope Benedict XVI a requirement for membership.

Actually I wouldn't object. First come first served on the claim to the the "Christian" club. If the Catholics didn't claim it first, then they would have to start a "Catholic" club.

The whole idea of a "Club" is to have a creed or common interest that the members are dedicated to. I suppose we could limit the membership to those who were in agreement with the Apostles Creed or the Nicene Creed and this would open it up to both Catholics and Traditional Protestants. But the Mormons and Jehovah's witnesses would object. Do you really care if they objected?

The problem we have in this society is that we are not willing to promote individuality and to discriminate on the basis of beliefs. The Universities want everyone to be part of the collective and therefore nobody can be excluded from membership in any club merely because they disagree with everything about it.

You start your "Christian Club" and make agreement with the Catholic Catechism a requirement for membership. Great, more power to you. I'll start a different club with a different creed. That's the American way.

43 posted on 04/28/2012 7:14:36 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (Virgil Goode! Because everyone else is Bad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Thank you for sharing your insights, dear brother in Christ!


44 posted on 04/28/2012 9:21:03 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
It’s a private university that receives huge quantities of state and federal funding.

It's state funding at least needs to immediately disappear...and its alumni need to cease with contributing. No hope of getting the Federal funding revoked under the current administration.

Has anyone in TN gotten a response from their legislators on the state funding?

45 posted on 04/28/2012 10:00:07 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

Typical political posturing, but no real action from the politicians last I heard. The university has threatened to quit treating poor folks at its hospital if it is forced to quit discriminating.


46 posted on 04/29/2012 5:18:15 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: BigCinBigD
I don’t see the point in telling a Christian group they can’t have Christian bylaws. Who but a Christian would want to join such a thing.

"Paging Sandra Fluke. Ms. Fluke, please pick up on the white courtesy phone..."


47 posted on 04/29/2012 5:22:23 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (FUMR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson