Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 04/27/2012 5:23:31 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator, reason:

dupe: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2876998/posts



Skip to comments.

Thinking Can Undermine Religious Faith, Study Finds
LATimes ^ | April 26, 2012 | Amina Khan

Posted on 04/26/2012 9:43:54 PM PDT by Steelfish

Thinking Can Undermine Religious Faith, Study Finds Those who think more analytically are less inclined to be religious believers than are those who tend to follow a gut instinct, researchers conclude.

Those who think more analytically are less inclined to be religious believers than are those who tend to follow a gut instinct, researchers conclude. By Amina Khan, Los Angeles Times April 26, 2012

Scientists have revealed one of the reasons why some folks are less religious than others: They think more analytically, rather than going with their gut. And thinking analytically can cause religious belief to wane — for skeptics and true believers alike.

The study, published in Friday's edition of the journal Science, indicates that belief may be a more malleable feature of the human psyche than those of strong faith may think.

The cognitive origins of belief — and disbelief — traditionally haven't been explored with academic rigor, said lead author Will Gervais, a social psychologist at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada.

"There's been a long-standing intellectual tradition of treating science as one thing and religion as separate, and never the twain shall meet," he said. But in recent years, he added, there has been a push "to understand religion and why our species has the capacity for religion."

According to one theory of human thinking, the brain processes information using two systems. The first relies on mental shortcuts by using intuitive responses — a gut instinct, if you will — to quickly arrive at a conclusion. The other employs deliberative analysis, which uses reason to arrive at a conclusion.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: duplicate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: Steelfish
The prime way most people define ‘analytical thinking’ is that the conclusions match their own.
41 posted on 04/27/2012 2:49:43 AM PDT by TalBlack ( Evil doesn't have a day job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HerrBlucher
Thinking undermines Atheism.

But the best of all is to let him read no science but to give him a grand general idea that he knows it all and that everything he happens to have picked up in casual talk and reading is "the results of modern investigation'. Do remember you are there to fuddle him. From the way some of you young fiends talk, anyone would suppose it was our job to teach!

--from the Screwtape Letters, intercepted from the infernal postal service by CS Lewis

42 posted on 04/27/2012 2:54:49 AM PDT by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Salamander
Imagine how many brilliant geniuses will eventually “think” themselves right into eternal damnation.

Rationalize themselves there yes...but honest thought has a tendency to validate the existence of a transcendent self existent moral God if carried all the way through to the logical end.

43 posted on 04/27/2012 3:06:30 AM PDT by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Prospero
Of course, analytical thinking gets people to quit reading the LA Times, too.

LOL! Well said!

44 posted on 04/27/2012 3:10:26 AM PDT by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Not true. I can count for it personally. I'm of an analytical bent of mind and logically to me religion makes sense. You cannot prove there is no God (I don't buy the Jainist view). And extending that, since there is a God or a creative force, is it an impersonal 'force' or is He a being? Logically it holds to the latter in terms of interactions.

Extending it further, the only religions I see that do not have inherent contradictions are Christianity and Zoroastrianism. Out of this Catholicism is the most logical to my mind.

there are also simple believing Catholics and to them, Catholicism is the most emotionally bringing them closer to God -- God is God of emotion, logic etc. etc.

45 posted on 04/27/2012 3:12:07 AM PDT by Cronos (**Marriage is about commitment, cohabitation is about convenience.**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndyTheBear
"...honest thought has a tendency to validate the existence of a transcendent self existent moral God if carried all the way through to the logical end"

Well said.

I sometimes think,or rather feel,that I was tricked and now that carnal mind and it's thinking seem to wander endlessly about looking for a way out.To be carnally minded is indeed death.

He must increase and I must decrease.

46 posted on 04/27/2012 3:19:53 AM PDT by mitch5501 ("make your calling and election sure: for if ye do these things ye shall never fall")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: AndyTheBear

Most of the ones I know will not make it through the brick wall they’ve carefully erected.

I guess I’m a simpleton.

I can sit and watch a colony of ants carrying on their daily business and see God’s hand at work.

I just don’t have enough faith to be an atheist.

:)


47 posted on 04/27/2012 3:54:12 AM PDT by Salamander (Hey blood brother, you're one of our own. You're as sharp as a razor and as hard as a stone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

LOL

Tell it to Sir Issac Newton. Probably the greatest scientist who ever lived who in fact spent more time studying and commenting on the Bible (over a million words of commentary) than on scientific research.


48 posted on 04/27/2012 4:07:07 AM PDT by bereanway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Faith is EVIDENCE of things unseen.

Analytical thinking provides that evidence.


49 posted on 04/27/2012 4:19:10 AM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
FLAWED Thinking Can Undermine Religious Faith, Study Finds
50 posted on 04/27/2012 4:56:48 AM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl; Steelfish; betty boop; P-Marlowe; wmfights
From the article: than are those who tend to follow a gut instinct, researchers

Yep, the scientific terms are killin' me.

Can't wait to see the definition of "gut instinct" and how it is: (1) equated with "faith" and "belief", and (2) how it is separated out and 100% isolated so it only can be studied.

51 posted on 04/27/2012 4:57:20 AM PDT by xzins (Vote Goode Not Evil! (the lesser of 2 evils is still evil))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson