Looks like I won’t be voting on the presidential part of the ballot. Hope we get a majority in the senate and obama has fun with full out obstructionism from the R’s.
It might be better than them working WITH Romney. Too many rino’s will let him do anything liberal, but they’d fight Obama simply because he’s obama. It may be the best course.
I said, MAY...
>> It might be better than them working WITH Romney. <<
Tell it to the Marines. Do think they would be better off “working with” Big Ø as CINC?
E X A C T L Y
Voting for Romney would be the end of Conservatism.
Santorum 2012
Me neither - or I will write in Newt.
I think you are right about Romney’s own Marxist leanings getting a pass, simply because he isn’t Obama, whereas Obama would be opposed tooth and nail should we gain the numbers to do so.
I hear now that Romney is bringing in an openly quere guy as an advisor on military matters for the campaign.
Romney never bothered with going Right during the primary, so imagine the contest ahead, between him and Obama, seeing who can out-Left the other.
Your theory is blown all to hell because the Kenyan has made it clear he will not be obstructed by Congress and has and will continue to blatantly defy them and do what he wants.
Check out Virgil Goode, who’s running for Prez as the Constitution Party’s candidate. He’s a good man.
Rather than withhold your vote for President, may I suggest that you either a) vote a third party candidate who better matches your values, or b) do a write-in if your state permits it.
Either of those, while they won't win the election, will allow you to cast your vote in a way that expresses your unhappiness with the offerings of the two establishment parties, and shows better your support for your own values.
I plan to write in Sarah Palin, because I believe she is the best we have for America. It pains me that she's not running, but since I can't get behind the establishment twits, I will express my support for someone who I believe represents the best match with my own values.
Respectfully submitted for your consideration.
I was planning the same thing... Not voting for Romney under any circumstances. However, this all changed when the SC took up Obamacare.
If Barack gets more liberal justices on the court, it is GAME OVER.
Under McConnell? Hardly. Sorry to say.
Don’t forget that obama will have more flexibility in a second term. We haven’t seen anything yet.
I don’t want mitt, but am I willing to give obama 3 USSC nominations?
The Republican running for Congress is my newly gerrymandered district is a right wing tea party member. He was a Santorum delegate and I really hope he wins. The rat who currently holds the job (Dem Dan Lipinski) inherited the office from his father.
That's Illinois for ya!
Agreed.
A) A Romney President doing the same things as Obama would divide the party and FAUX news would be saying “oh those troublesome Tea Partiers” every day.
B) An Obama Presidency would unite everyone against him.
I choose “B” for the good of us all. God Help Us !