Sheriff Joe releasing more on Obama (Explosive)

WND ^ | April 24, 2012 | Jerome R. Corsi

[Smokeyblue]

Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio finds himself under increasing attack as he prepares to release new findings in his investigation of President Obama’s eligibility for the state’s 2012 election ballot.

“I have no intention of resigning,” said Arpaio, who is running for his sixth term as sheriff of Maricopa County. “They forget I have a four-decades long career in federal law enforcement that includes having been a special agent for the FBI and having worked for the Drug Enforcement Agency in the United States, as well as in Argentina, Turkey and Mexico.

WND previously reported the intensity of attacks on Arpaio at both a state and national level.

Already, Arpaio has announced that his volunteer law enforcement investigation has found probable cause that Obama’s long-form birth certificate and his Selective Service registration form are forgeries. Arpaio and his team made the announcement at a March 1 press conference.

A second press conference is expected in the next few weeks to announce more findings Arpaio suggests will be explosive.

[little jeremiah]

Your comments are interesting, carry on...

[little jeremiah]

Any of them who have remained silent to due gross ignorance or threats may not be criminally culpable although they certainly should not be re-elected.

Arguing from the future is not rational. We don’t know what where this will go.

[Natufian]

Have WND been threatened? If so, why haven’t they reported on it? If not, why not - they’re releasing books and providing their evidence to the CCP, after all?

[sueQ]

Do you think someone who has the ability to do so should check on AG? Should the Admin possibly check it out? His post is kind of disturbing. Hope he’s OK.

[Flotsam_Jetsome]

Thanks for the Ping! Get ‘em Joe!!

[little jeremiah]

He’s probably ok....

[Longbow1969]

Anybody who’s been listening to the evidence knows the media people have all been threatened into silence.

All of them huh? All the media people threatened into silence? All the broadcast media, the radio talk show hosts, the cable networks including Fox, etc? Do you realize how utterly insane you sound when you say nutty things like this? I mean, you sound precisely like the classic demented, paranoid conspiracy theorist. Were all the conservative legal foundations threatened into silence? Were all significant influential conservative leaders threatened into silence? Who is carrying out all these threats?

We all know why they won’t, and it’s not because the issue is a dud, but because it’s NOT a dud. You get flak when you’re over the target. And I’d say death threats are flak...

So on top of the birther conspiracies, there is a giant death threat operation going on to silence....the entire media. You are building even nuttier conspiracies on top of your original conspiracy theory. You sound absolutely crazy.

[sueQ]

You are woefully ignorant. Butterdezillion is absolutely correct.

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/13373

http://www.therothshow.com/demos/recent/hour1Aug0709.mp3
http://www.therothshow.com/demos/recent/hour2Aug0709.mp3
http://www.therothshow.com/demos/recent/hour3Aug0709.mp3

[JohnnyP]

There are a few talk hosts that take calls on the subject:

Larry Elder, though he is a non-believer
Rodger Hedgecock is one of us
Peter Boyles is also a birther, but he believes Bush and Cheney are criminals!?!?
Bob Grant, is a birther, but he believes Marco Rubio is eligible (it’s just a technicality to him).

[little jeremiah]

I think he’s posted comments on other threads since then; maybe he’s just backing off of this topic.

[pricilla]

Oh come on!of course we know where this is going.These weasles will continue to be elected and nothing is ever going to happen to those responsible for this latest fiasco.The corruption is far too deep in all branches of government.As for arguing the future not being rational,I argue that the sun will rise tomorrow...

[sueQ]

Did you even watch Sheriff Arpaio’s news conference? Did you not notice that the reporters were not at all interested in the evidence? No questions about the evidence...only questions about his motivation.

[sueQ]

@7:41 Thanks

[sueQ]

Thanks,

Rodger Hedgecock , I know of. He’s filled in for Rush before. I will look him up on Iheart. I think I heard Peter Boyles. Isn’t he out of Colorado? The rest I will look up. Thanks so much.

[Longbow1969]

LOL, you don't really take this seriously do you? You simply can't be this naive.

Although we possess the original document containing the name and contact information of the talk show host, we have decided not to publish his name or network affiliation at this time. Based on the correspondence from this individual and respecting the nature of the threats to him personally and professionally, it is our decision to allow him to enjoy anonymity until such time as he decides to reveal the facts himself at a time of his choosing.

LOL. So this article is from years ago, who was this talk show host?

This source confirmed that she drafted the memo to the various hosts to notify them of the date, time and location of this high-level meeting at the request of the network’s top executive.

Again, the article is from years ago, who is this administrative assistant?

I tried to listen to some of this interview of Doug Hagmann you linked to me and it is utterly absurd. These people have zero evidence, only their story. The only reason for you to believe this is because you WANT to believe it. Anyone could make up stuff like this.

This story is going on 3 years old now, they have no evidence, they have no names, and nothing ever came of any of it. On the radio they claim the names and evidence will come forward in the future, where is it? Why on earth would you believe this story without any evidence?

[sueQ]

Do you believe that the LFBC that Obama posted online a year ago is legit?

[sueQ]

What about his draft card and SS#?

[Longbow1969]

Do you believe that the LFBC that Obama posted online a year ago is legit?

Yup, I was fine with the short form. The long form release did make the "Donald" look like a bigger fool than usual, so I was kinda happy about that since Trump is a clown and I was getting tired of him pretending to be a conservative.

[sueQ]

I suggest you do your research before you make yourself out to be the “bigger fool” and “clown” than even the “Donald”.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s9StxsFllY

[john mirse]

Anybody have a theory as to why Obama had to order a long form birth certificate in April 2011 in the first place?

Why doesn't a reporter ask such a question at one of the daily White House press conferences?

Did Obama simply lose the one he had?

Did the dog eat it?

Was the one he had in such bad shape that Obama just wanted to get a new one that was in better shape?

Obama must have lost his long form in 2007 or some time before, because he ordered a short form in 2007, as evident by the 2007 stamped on the back of the short form.

I keep wondering over these past 4 years why Obama simply didn't order a long form in 2007 instead of ordering a short form, because back then, as I understand it, a person could still order a long form from Hawaii.

In addition, Obama was a U.S. Senator back in 2007, and I doubt that Hawaii officials would have denied a U.S. Senator's request for his long form birth certificate, especially if the request came from the nationally known Hawaiian son named Barack Obama.