Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rocket launcher discovered amid household trash alarms neighbors
yourhoustonnews.com ^ | 19 April 2012 | Stefanie Thomas

Posted on 04/20/2012 12:35:20 PM PDT by smokingfrog

KINGWOOD - Residents at a Forest Cove town home community had quite a scare Thursday morning when they found a military rocket launcher-type weapon lying on top of some boxes laid out for trash pickup.

“I was pretty sure it was real when the garbage people wouldn’t pick it up and said they weren’t messing with it,” said neighbor James Earl.

Agents with the Houston division of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms responded to the 900 block of Marina Dr. around 11 a.m. April 19 and confirmed that the fear-inspiring object was indeed a military guided missile device. Agents quickly determined, however, that the weapon no longer contained any explosive agents and all that remained was the hull.

“It must have been in storage for a very long time,” Sr. Special Agent Arthur Gonzalez said at the scene. “It was very dirty and had all kinds of cobwebs inside. I cleaned it out and even found a bunch of black widow spider eggs inside the tube.”

Gonzalez said it is not illegal to own a spent rocket launcher.

(Excerpt) Read more at yourhoustonnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: banglist; rocketlauncher
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: the_daug

Heck, the news media can’t report accurately on conventional firearms. How did you suppose they would do with one each M72A2 Light Antitank Weapon (with coupler - very important that...)


21 posted on 04/20/2012 1:55:21 PM PDT by SargeK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

So they found a tube. Scary. Any PVC close by?


22 posted on 04/20/2012 1:57:38 PM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the_daug
This was a Redeye Antiaircraft Guided Missile Launcher.
23 posted on 04/20/2012 1:59:35 PM PDT by DJ Taylor (Once again our country is at war, and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Someone got carried away in their preps, then came to their senses. ;)


24 posted on 04/20/2012 2:01:20 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

You’re probably right. I found one in the trash when I was 11. Talk about a prize!


25 posted on 04/20/2012 2:01:41 PM PDT by ebshumidors ( Marksmanship and YOUR heritage http://www.appleseedinfo.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
It looks a lot like a Stinger surface-to-air missile.
26 posted on 04/20/2012 2:23:26 PM PDT by JerseyanExile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DJ Taylor
This was a Redeye Antiaircraft Guided Missile Launcher.

I think you're right.

27 posted on 04/20/2012 2:29:19 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
It's a FIM-43 Redeye training unit. It's not a real launcher. Made for indoor training back in the '70s where the tracking unit was pointed at a big screen RGB projection display television which showed film of a flying MiG fighter jet.

You stood in a darkened room and trained to get 'lock on' on the jet appearing on the big screen TV, then you'd fire. It was like playing a video game.

This launcher taken from whoever's trash has the flashlight gizmo in the tube and the training module dealie mounted on it. It only bears similarity to a real FIM-43 launcher.

28 posted on 04/20/2012 2:31:58 PM PDT by The KG9 Kid (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
Rocket launcher discovered amid household trash alarms neighbors.

Mom said if I didn't pick up my toys she was going to throw them out. I guess she wasn't kidding.

29 posted on 04/20/2012 2:32:47 PM PDT by Homer_J_Simpson ("Every nation has the government that it deserves." - Joseph de Maistre (1753-1821))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Were they upset because someone didn’t put it in the recycle bin?


30 posted on 04/20/2012 2:35:26 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Oh you trembling, hand-wringing excuses for what were once Americans.


31 posted on 04/20/2012 2:47:49 PM PDT by dljordan ("Tyranny, like Hell, is not easily conquered.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The KG9 Kid

I thought it might be a training device. Something about it didn’t look right. Pretty old school stuff alright. Redeye had a hard time hitting the fast movers, didn’t it?


32 posted on 04/20/2012 2:54:42 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Somebody got a good wall hanger!


33 posted on 04/20/2012 3:11:39 PM PDT by JDoutrider (Impeach! Incarcerate! Deport!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
"Pretty old school stuff alright... Redeye had a hard time hitting the fast movers, didn’t it?"

My opinion is that all man-portable air defense systems sort of suck, some more/some less, depending.

I don't know if the FIM-43 Redeye was ever used in combat, but I don't think that they were ever needed by US troops in Vietnam. If they ever were used by US troops in combat, I can only think that Lebanon or Grenada would have been the places where a Redeye might have been used before these were taken out of service.

I don't know what any non-US state (which might have acquired any) thought about them in practice, or if they ever fulfilled their role in downing an enemy aircraft.

Only thing I know about MANPADS are that they're very limited in their opportunity to down an aircraft. Fast fighter jets can be out of danger before you can get a lock-on. They can be effective vs. helicopters, but trying to down a enormous jumbo jet with one probably isn't going to do critical damage to such a large aircraft.

Of course, I guess it's all about luck. When I was 9 years old, I hit and killed an airborne horsefly firing a Daisy BB gun from about 25 feet from the hip. My grandmother was even witness to this amazing feat, but she's been gone since 1979 so you're going to have to take my word that this happened.

34 posted on 04/20/2012 3:51:46 PM PDT by The KG9 Kid (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: the_daug; Squantos
If one of these I don't think is a guided missile launcher.

Not one of those. One of these:


35 posted on 04/21/2012 6:26:37 AM PDT by archy (I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
I thought it might be a training device. Something about it didn’t look right. Pretty old school stuff alright. Redeye had a hard time hitting the fast movers, didn’t it?

Like its contemporary the 9K32M Strela-2M, aka SAM-2 to NATO, the Redeye was a tailchase heat-seeker, and was NOT *fire-and-forget*- the gunner had to continue the track until impact, a considerable disadvantage when dealing with hostile CAS aircraft or attack helos.

There's something about that launch unit that looks un-Redeye-ish to my old eyes, but it's been 40-years plus since I've had one on my shoulder. It may be one of the *block III launch units, which were different. But I bet Squantos knows.

FIM-43_Redeye
Comparison chart

System 9K32M Strela-2M
(missile: 9M32M)
9K34 Strela-3
(missile: 9M36)
FIM-43C Redeye
Service entry 1968 1974 1968
Weight of system
ready to shoot
15 kg 16 kg 13.3 kg
Missile weight 9.8 kg 10.3 kg 8.3 kg
Length 1.44 m 1.47 m 1.40 m
Warhead weight 1.17 kg 1.17 kg 1.06 kg
Warhead type Directed-energy
blast fragmentation
Directed-energy
blast fragmentation
Blast fragmentation (M222)
Warhead explosive content 0.37 kg HMX 0.37 kg HMX
and 20g secondary charge [4]
0.36 kg HTA-3
Missile engagement aspect Tail-chase only Limited forward hemisphere
(all-aspect) capability
Tail-chase / limited forward-hemisphere
(depending on conditions and version)
Seeker type Uncooled
PbS detector element
(1–2.8 µm sensitivity range).
Nitrogen-cooled
PbS detector element
(2–4.3 µm sensitivity range).
Gas-cooled (FIM-43A:
Peltier cooled)
PbS detector element
Seeker modulation AM-modulated (spin scan) FM-modulated (conical scan) AM-modulated
Maximum range 4,200 m 4,100 m 4,500 m
Missile speed 500 m/s 450 m/s 580 m/s
Maximum speed target speed 260 m/s (receding) 310 m/s (receding) 225 m/s
Engagement altitude 0.05-2.3 km 0.03-2.3 ... 3.0 km 0.05-2.7 km


36 posted on 04/21/2012 6:40:25 AM PDT by archy (I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: The KG9 Kid
I don't know what any non-US state (which might have acquired any) thought about them in practice, or if they ever fulfilled their role in downing an enemy aircraft.

In addition to the U.S., provided to Australia, Croatia, El Salvador, West Germany, Israel, Nicaragua, Sweden, Thailand and Turkey. Reportedly, Iran got some before the 1979 overthrow of the Shah.

I don't know if the FIM-43 Redeye was ever used in combat,

Yes. But not, so far as I know, by US troops in US uniform.

37 posted on 04/21/2012 6:47:46 AM PDT by archy (I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: dljordan
Oh you trembling, hand-wringing excuses for what were once Americans.

They're a little more hinky about such things around Fort Bliss than elsewhere. And with good reason.

38 posted on 04/21/2012 6:49:46 AM PDT by archy (I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

“It was very dirty and had all kinds of cobwebs inside. I cleaned it out and even found a bunch of black widow spider eggs inside the tube.”

I bet if you took it out in the middle of the street and pointed it at a police car you’d get a reaction. :)

But, no, empty LAWS tubes are not illegal or dangerous.


39 posted on 04/21/2012 7:00:50 AM PDT by PLMerite (Shut the Beyotch Down! Burn, baby, burn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: archy

Destroyed many of those in the late 80’s ..... some via trigger, others on a demolition shot...... etc .

Most out at Eagle Range between Wendover and SLC Utah.

I have seen a bunch of em in central america and ecuador. Military aid package no doubt......:o)

Stay safe Archy !


40 posted on 04/21/2012 7:01:56 AM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson