You probably think so because you didn't well understand the argument I made.
It is possible to want to conserve the economic liberty the Founders provided and thereby be a conservative. Nothing requires us to want to conserve all ( e.g.Slavery) of what the Founders gave us to be a conservative.
Irrelevant. We didn't have slavery up until the late 1960s, which is what the numeric I provided calcs to. I realise that I didn't spend six paragraphs spelling out each and every last thing that I was implicitly referring to, but I rather thought the reader might use some common sense.
Generally when I get a defensive angry response from someone, I’ve found a weak spot. “Conservative” means to be in favor if conserving. Conserving economic freedom is just as “ conservative” as conserving social norms. Your position is weak.