[combat_boots]

I am monstrously PO’d at Beck and Rush for claiming such patriotism that they do not NAME F&F, the eligibility fraud, MF Global, etc., etc., and throw these a$$holes into Quetta with a toothpick and KY. To back Romney, a Progressive and YET another Soros pick, a la McCain, at the same time Beck hoisted Gingrich on his own petard for being a Progressive just makes me SICK. Makes me want to drink Listerine straight until I puke.

Shame on them all.

Someone sent me a rant about a woman who called some Senator’s office. She actually called the Senator a coward.

More than cowards, I have come to a terrible conclusion: most of the DC types have graduated to evil, in M Scott Peck’s description:

“There really are people and institutions made up of people, who respond with hatred in the presence of goodness and would destroy the good insofar as it is in their power to do so. They do this not with conscious malice but blindly, lacking awareness of their own evil — indeed, seeking to avoid any such awareness. As has been described of the devil in religious literature, they hate the light and instinctively will do anything to avoid it, including attempting to extinguish it. They will destroy the light in their own children and in all other beings subject to their power.

Evil people hate the light because it reveals themselves to themselves. They hate goodness because it reveals their badness; they hate love because it reveals their laziness. They will destroy the light, the goodness, the love in order to avoid the pain of such self-awareness. My second conclusion, then, is that evil is laziness carried to its ultimate, extraordinary extreme. As I have defined it, love is the antithesis of laziness. Ordinary laziness is a passive failure to love. Some ordinarily lazy people may not lift a finger to extend themselves unless they are compelled to do so. Their being is a manifestation of nonlove; still, they are not evil.

Truly evil people, on the other hand, actively rather than passively avoid extending themselves. They will take any action in their power to protect their own laziness, to preserve the integrity of their sick self. Rather than nurturing others, they will actually destroy others in this cause. If necessary, they will even kill to escape the pain of their own spiritual growth. As the integrity of their sick self is threatened by the spiritual health of those around them, they will seek by all manner of means to crush and demolish the spiritual health that may exist near them.

I define evil, then, as the exercise of political power — that is, the imposition of one’s will upon others by overt or covert coercion — in order to avoid extending one’s self for the purpose of nurturing spiritual growth. Ordinary laziness is nonlove; evil is antilove.”

From “The People of the Lie”
Helluva book, that one. I have known many people that fit this description. Enough that I am, for tonight,

out.

[esquirette]

Keeper comment!

[who knows what evil?]

I may frame your most outstanding post. I stand back with awe and admiration...

[unkus]

Excellent! Thank you, c_b

[visualops]

bump

[plsjr]

Thanks combat for the clarity:

combt_boots:
I am monstrously PO’d at Beck and Rush for claiming such patriotism that they do not NAME F&F, the eligibility fraud, MF Global, etc., etc., and throw these a$$holes into Quetta with a toothpick and KY. To back Romney, a Progressive and YET another Soros pick, a la McCain, at the same time Beck hoisted Gingrich on his own petard for being a Progressive just makes me SICK. Makes me want to drink Listerine straight until I puke.

Shame on them all.

Someone sent me a rant about a woman who called some Senator’s office. She actually called the Senator a coward.

More than cowards, I have come to a terrible conclusion: most of the DC types have graduated to evil, in M Scott Peck’s description:

“There really are people and institutions made up of people, who respond with hatred in the presence of goodness and would destroy the good insofar as it is in their power to do so. They do this not with conscious malice but blindly, lacking awareness of their own evil — indeed, seeking to avoid any such awareness. As has been described of the devil in religious literature, they hate the light and instinctively will do anything to avoid it, including attempting to extinguish it. They will destroy the light in their own children and in all other beings subject to their power.

Evil people hate the light because it reveals themselves to themselves. They hate goodness because it reveals their badness; they hate love because it reveals their laziness. They will destroy the light, the goodness, the love in order to avoid the pain of such self-awareness. My second conclusion, then, is that evil is laziness carried to its ultimate, extraordinary extreme. As I have defined it, love is the antithesis of laziness. Ordinary laziness is a passive failure to love. Some ordinarily lazy people may not lift a finger to extend themselves unless they are compelled to do so. Their being is a manifestation of nonlove; still, they are not evil.

Truly evil people, on the other hand, actively rather than passively avoid extending themselves. They will take any action in their power to protect their own laziness, to preserve the integrity of their sick self. Rather than nurturing others, they will actually destroy others in this cause. If necessary, they will even kill to escape the pain of their own spiritual growth. As the integrity of their sick self is threatened by the spiritual health of those around them, they will seek by all manner of means to crush and demolish the spiritual health that may exist near them.

I define evil, then, as the exercise of political power — that is, the imposition of one’s will upon others by overt or covert coercion — in order to avoid extending one’s self for the purpose of nurturing spiritual growth. Ordinary laziness is nonlove; evil is antilove.”

From “The People of the Lie”
Helluva book, that one. I have known many people that fit this description. Enough that I am, for tonight,

out.

[oprahstheantichrist]

Ann has quoted you on her blog:

"3. Here's a great quote posted by commenter "combat_boots" at FreeRepublic. The quote is from M. Scott Peck, a psychologist...."

http://barnhardt.biz/

Scroll down to "MISH-MASH."

[who knows what evil?]

Hi, boots! You’ve made the ‘big time’...see post #77. Ann picked up on your quote from Peck...

[OneLoyalAmerican]

Greetings combat_boots & Ann Barnhardt:

Nice job combat_boots, Ann Barnhardt picked up your quotes. Hello Ann, we're glad you're here! Perhaps FreeRepublic is a good location for retaining Ann's great blog insight.

Ann's tweet to this Doug Casey editorial Sociopathy Is Running the US - Part Two is definitely worth the reader's time.

Cheers,
OLA