Even if Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama had been birthed in the Lincoln Bedroom of the White House Obama is NOT a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.
Ping
The corruption continues.
The rot in Obamaville is close to the core.
If the public followed the idiocy being dispensed by judges the salaries and benefits to judges would become a good target for the people's house. Unfortunately, since some of us read the Constitution, it isn't possible to diminish their compensation. But this nonsense is not “good behavior,” and that is the constitutional ground for impeaching judges. Of course, like every other term in the Constitution, “good Behavior” is not defined in the Constitution, so we will need to explore the common-law at the time of the framers, or look for precedent. These judges are clearly more afraid of the SEIU (Obama’s army, bigger than the military) than they are of populace they used to serve.
Judge mindmelding continues.
Judge Masin ruled that Obama need not comply with statute to show that he is eligible
The judge suggested that Obama might have to show eligibility later. He laid no basis for such a ruling.
The judge misread the precedents and gave short shrift to the historical evidence that the Framers of the Constitution defined “natural-born citizen” as one born in-country to two citizen parents.
Openly looks like tyranny to me.
sfl
It really is this easy to tear up the Constitution, the most significant document in human history. And not a whimper of complaint.
How I Learned to Love Savannah Guthrie
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/04/how_i_learned_to_love_savannah_guthrie.html
Per ApuzzoPuzoAbuzzOuzoAPOPizzaApesAppsApseOpusApia’sApieceApaceApe’sUziAppApolloAPAZApposeOpus’sUSOApePausePusAu’s:
“Counsel will be able to object to Judge MasinMa sinMa-sinMas inMas-inMasonMaisonMassingMacingMainMesonMusingMarinBasinMessingMissingMossingMussingMansonMasonsMaskingManiMashingMainsMaineMasaiMazziniMousingManMarniMinMasSinMaisieMaxineMaxingMuslinMannMassMason’sMa’sMai’sMani’s’s initial decision. The Secretary of State will make the final decision. After her decision, the parties can then appeal to the New Jersey Appellate Division and then to the New Jersey Supreme Court. After that, the parties can appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.”
This is all that Mario was trying to achieve...a path to SCOTUS. At each step on the way the fact that the emperor has no clothes will be evident...and hopefully will be covered in the NJ media market next to NYC.
New Jersey Judge Admits: “Obama Hasn’t Provided
Proof of Birthplace”. Then Rules Obama Born in Hawaii
This sounds like the judge was bought off ...... I listened to the 2 videos
Judge Mason clearly was siding with Apuzo.
“Stating that he has not seen
any documentation that Obama was born in Hawaii”.....
Judge stated: “ We all know that Obama’s father was not a ‘Citizen’
of the US”...
Judge said: “Obama admitted this fact himself”
Obama’s lawyer did not present a copy of “Forged BC”
She said it was not required.
If the public followed the idiocy being dispensed by judges the salaries and benefits to judges would become a good target for the people's house. Unfortunately, since some of us read the Constitution, it isn't possible to diminish their compensation. But this nonsense is not “good behavior,” and that is the constitutional ground for impeaching judges. Of course, like every other term in the Constitution, “good Behavior” is not defined in the Constitution, so we will need to explore the common-law at the time of the framers, or look for precedent. These judges are clearly more afraid of the SEIU (Obama’s army, bigger than the military) than they are of populace they used to serve.
Absolutely astounding!
To run for office or to vote, you don't.
ML/NJ
1. PRIVATE LAWYER: It looks like a private lawyer and not a government lawyer defended Obama in this case.
2. STIPULATION: Obama's lawyer stipulated that the long form birth certificate on the White House site would not be used by the lawyer and the judge as evidence. (I'm not a lawyer, so I'm not sure how the term "stipulation" is used in court. So if someone could help me wth the term "stipulation", I would appreciate it.)
PRIVATE LAWYER: I found the use of a private lawyer interesting for this reason: I remember how Obama supporters argue that anyone who claims that Obama is paying lawyers a million dollars to defend him in these type of cases is crazy, because most of Obama's defense is being conducted by government lawyers, and evern if Obama uses private lawyers, the cost is very low.
1. To me, if private lawyers are defending Obama in all these ballot challenges, then I would think that the cost is NOT low. Rather, I would think that it cost a lot of money to hire high-priced lawyers to defend Obama against the many eligibility challenges.
2. I wonder who is paying the bills of these high-priced lawyers? Obama? The Democratic Party? Are the lawyers working pro-bono, that is, for free?
3. Of course, Obama could stop all these eligibility challenges and avoid having to pay all these high-priced lawyers by doing some simple things tomorrow:
a. SELECTIVE SERVICE FORM: He could release his original Selective Service form.
b. LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE: He could tell Hawaii officials to allow Arizona officials to examine his original 1961 long form birth certificate in the Hawaii archives.
c. 1970s SOCIAL SECURITY APPLICATION: He could allow Arizona officials to examine a copy of his Social Security application. ( NOTE: Anyone, especially the President of the United States, can obtain a copy of his own original application form by requesting one from Social Security and paying a small fee.)
4. Of course, Obama and/or the Democratic Party would rather pay thousands of dollars to private lawyers instead of voluntarily releasing the documents above. Why is that? Could it be that Obama is trying to hide something?
STIPULATION regarding Obama's long form birth certificate seen on the White House website
1. In this New Jersey case, I found it remarkable that Obama's private lawyer would STIPULATE that the long form birth certificate would NOT be used to prove Obama's eligibility, which meant that Obama's private lawyer would present NO evidence that Obama was eligible. (I'm not a lawyer, so I'm not quite sure what "STIPULATION" means in a court of law. So I would appreciate it if someone could explain the term in easy to understand language.)
2. I found the stipulation remarkable for this reason: I would think that now Obama ballot challengers could cite the stipulation in this New Jersey case to force Obama's lawyers in other eligibility cases to also stipulate that Obama's long form birth certificate as seen on the White House website would not be introduced as proof that Obama was born in the United States.
3. Again, this stipulation by Obama's lawyer in this New Jersey court case seems to give persons some new-found ammunition that they can use in future Obama ballot challenges, because Obama's lawyer has opened the eligibility gate by going on the record in a court of law that Obama's long form birth certificate need not be introduced as proof that Obama was born in the United States.
4. And if Obama's long form birth certificate as seen on the White House site will not be introduced as evidence in future court cases to prove that Obama was born in Hawaii, then what other evidence can Obama's private lawyers and sitting judges point to in court to prove that Obama was indeed born in the United States? I can't think of any other evidence that Obama could present in court that he was born in Hawaii. Can you? Thanks.