Posted on 04/10/2012 6:38:14 AM PDT by marktwain
Introduced by Representative Morgan Griffith (R-VA) and co-sponsored by Representatives Bill Owens (D-NY) and Ted Poe (R-TX), House Bill HR 4269 would make several much needed improvements to the interstate-transportation portion of the Firearm Owners’ Protection Act.
The Firearm Owners’ Protection Act, or FOPA, was passed in 1986 in response to numerous reported instances of gun dealers being harassed by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF). In addition to the regulatory reform of the ATF, FOPA also addressed a number of other issues including machine gun ownership, registration, background checks, and interstate transportation of firearms.
At the time of its passage, the bill was known as the McClure-Volkmer Act after the bi-partisan duo who sponsored the legislation; Senators Harold Volkmer (D-MO) and Jim McClure (R-ID). Writing at the Volokh Conspiracy blog, Dave Kopel once called FOPA “one of the most far-reaching laws ever enacted by Congress to safeguard constitutional rights.”
The interstate transportation portion of FOPA was designed to protect innocent gun owners who might happen to travel through a state with draconian gun control laws while in lawful possession of firearms. In order to enjoy the “safe passage” protections of FOPA, which are codified at 18 U.S.C. § 926A, a gun owner must meet the following requirements:
* The firearm must be unloaded * The firearm must in a locked container * The container cannot be within easy reach of the vehicles passengers * The journey must start in a state where the person can legally possess and carry the firearm * The journey must end in a state where the person can legally possess and carry the firearm * It must be an uninterrupted journey (only gas and bathroom stops)
For example, you would be protected by FOPA if you were transporting an unloaded firearm in a locked case out of your reach through Maryland on a journey from Virginia to Pennsylvania but you would lose FOPA protection if you stopped in Maryland to visit family or decided to have Maryland be the end point of your journey.
It sounds simple enough right? But despite the relatively straightforward requirements and the clear congressional intent to protect otherwise innocent gun owners from onerous transportation laws, New York and New Jersey both have a history of ignoring FOPA and subjecting innocent gun owners to malicious prosecution.
HR 4269 attempts to remedy this by making the following changes to 18 U.S.C. § 926A:
* Defining the travel thus protected as specifically including “temporary lodging overnight, stopping for food, fuel, vehicle maintenance, an emergency, medical treatment, and any other activity incidental to the transport.” This would seem to overturn the disastrous ruling from the 3rd Circuit in Gregg C. Revell v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey * In the case of prosecution, places the burden on the state to prove “beyond a reasonable doubt, that the conduct of the person did not satisfy the conditions” protected by the statute instead of requiring the gun owner to prove the elements as an affirmative defense. * Makes it clear that both firearms and ammunition are thus protected
But from a legal perspective, I believe the most important change that HR 4269 will make to 18 U.S.C. § 926A is to affirmatively create a cause of action against any person, state, or political subdivision of a state who deprives a gun owner of the safe passage rights granted by 18 U.S.C. § 926A. Even better, any plaintiff winning in such a suit may also be granted “reasonable attorney’s fees” insuring that plaintiffs will not have trouble finding attorneys willing to handle their cases.
But none of this will happen if HR 4269 doesn’t pass. You need to take action today. Contact your representative at (202) 225-3121 and urge them to support HR 4269!
Laws restraining trampling of rights can mean little. FOPA’s right to travel with locked & cased & stowed arms didn’t do me any good post-9/11 when a Buffalo airport transit cop did all he could to prevent my checking an unloaded locked checked Glock, and finally declared “we are the law of this airport and you are not taking that”; option was leave it in the car or miss my flight. Got the whole incident recorded, but NRA et al weren’t interested.
We need to repeal 18 USC 922 (o) also!
I'll call my friend, Sen. John Boozeman (R-AR) and tell him to keep an eye out for Senate version.
What do you legal types see wrong with this supposed "fix"? ....other than they need to add:
Sec. 926B. 18 USC 922 (o) is hearby repealed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.