Lowry is a pussy. This shows how weak that magazine has become since Buckley died. Screw You NR.
I read the Derbyshire article. It was honest.
The Kenyan lizard’s pimp pimp Holder would be impressed.
NR is worthless and weak.
You can't handle the truth!
America is a failed state.
We will never get over the issue of slavery.
Blacks bring it up for cash and power and Whites accept it.
No conservative site, or discussion forums are able to challenge Jessie, Al or Farrakhan.
America must fold and start anew.
You must never tell the truth about Eric Holder’s people.
National Review descends from the gutter to the sewer.
I no longer visit them, because I don’t want to give them any hits.
I don’t agree with Ann Coulter much anymore, but she nails it right on when she refers to these guys as “The Girly Boys at NRO”
http://www.nytimes.com/1999/06/20/magazine/the-color-of-suspicion.html?pagewanted=5
F*** that.
National Review needs to go away and Breitbart needs his own mag.
Someone make it happen because screw all that Romney-pimping and Cain/Newt bombing.
Derbyshire’s article sounded like common sense to me. I’m sure an Afro-American could pen an equally reasonable list of cautionary rules to use when dealing with a surfeit of Caucasoids. National Review seems to have lost its rudder. When my subscription is done, so am I.
Coward is right.
NRO seems to have disabled comments on Lowry’s two posts about Derb.
This is “Breaking News”?
NRO=Electronic toilet paper
Now, I have fired the NRO. Over the years, I have been going there less and less. They are more interested in the approval of the msm than writing the truth. I will not miss going there.
What did the writer say in order to get fired? Did he finally discuss race?
I gave a curtailed version of that talk to my daughter when she went off to college in Baltimore, focusing on recent crimes there, and the fact that a third of the young black men are under the supervision of the criminal justice system, and that young black women in that city had also committed race-based crime.
She cut me off; she thought I was racist, but a few months of the local news and older students’ stories showed her that I was on the mark, and she is properly cautious.
I added that she should keep her long hair tied up and not “flip” it.
I told her that when I was in college, too many young black men, including fellow students, were trophy-hunting white girls, and that she should never feel pressured by accusations of racism.
I didn’t say anything about acquiring a well-spoken black friend as a shield against accusations of racism; that IS wrong.
I do not want my sweet, loving, unprejudiced daughter injured or raped or killed because she is naive about the racial realities of big city crime, or for her to suppress her survival instincts and common sense for fear of being “racist.”
For Derbyshire to write this publicly is to get fired from a conservative magazine.
For me to say publicly, that I had advised my daughter this way, would be to find myself ostracized in my town - this upscale exurban high-achieving paradise that all the newcomers picked for its good schools - which is code for what most of them will never say aloud or even let themselves think.
NR is dead to me.
Nothing in that article was one bit racist.
The National Review now stands athwart history, yelling,”Please don’t hurt me. I promise to be a good little poodle.”
Let me guess... no comments allowed on the page?
I read the article this morning. All it does is describe
the guidelines most people live by. Guess you just can’t have it in print or say it out loud. I’m sure holder is
ROTFLHBAO. Someone wasn’t a coward to have the conversation.
National Review is like the Weekly Reader we used to get in grade school, Its about 17 pages. Who cares. By the way NR if you’re lurking,quit sending me stuff in the mail.