"Nicely Done. *snip*
"The lineage of the Commander-in-Chief is worthy of serious discussion, and should not be relegated to Pravda or Prison Planet.
Boy, if that's not a backhanded compliment, I don't know what is. And you're comparing Pravda, which is not any worse/sensational than say, the New York Post, with Prison Planet? Really?
"Your 'Minor' crusade is not enhanced by the BC forgery accusations. Quite the contrary."
Revelations of forgery do nothing to detract from the two-citizen parent argument whatsoever. IF "Obama" is telling the truth and his father is the foreign student Barack Hussein Obama Sr. then he's unqualified, but the forgery points up possible birth abroad also, which would make Barry doubly ineligible, both via Jus Soli and Jus Sanguinis. Or he could be somehow a NBC of some other lineage, in which case he's qualified but his entire life's narrative is shown to be a fraud.
And then you go straight into this:
"The basic facts of Obama’s birth relevant to his NBC status are generally agreed upon by both sides. Dad was a Kenyan."
What? That's a textbook example of argumentum ad populum. So are you saying the findings of Joe Arpaio's Cold Case Posse are of no value? Barry claims that he was born in Hawaii and that Dad was a Kenyan. No definitive proof of either has been offered to date, one way or the other. As has been said many times by others: These are not the actions of an honest man.
Once more on this: "The lineage of the Commander-in-Chief is worthy of serious discussion, . . ."
What do you even mean by that statement? Do you really believe it to be worthy of serious discussion? In what way?
"JMO... worth what you paid for it."
Well, at least that last was honest.
Another great offering, Danae. And to LucyT:
