Posted on 04/05/2012 10:56:20 AM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
SANFORD, Florida (CNN) - A forensic audio expert who analyzed 911 recordings disagrees with speculation that George Zimmerman uttered a racial slur moments before shooting Trayvon Martin to death.
What the neighborhood watch volunteer whispered as he followed the teen leading up to the deadly confrontation could weigh into the decision about charges against Zimmerman.
The garbled word that raised controversy was "punks," not "coons," said Tom Owen, chairman emeritus of the American Board of Recorded Evidence.
When Owen used a computer application to remove cell phone interference, the word became clearer, he said. After discussions with linguists, he became convinced that Zimmerman said "punks," he said.
He provided CNN with a copy of the processed audio.
(Excerpt) Read more at wgal.com ...
I heard that, too! Though, it could be the voices in my head talking... :p
Just waiting for the Leftists to spin the word, “punk” to mean something racist.
Any other analysis is HOGWASH.
The point is, once the noise and content are one file, separating them is not an exact science.
First two officers didn’t do it....Only the officer who followed him. Coming in out of the rain/mud he wipes his feet...His mother taught him well. And you are correct a punk would not have been as courteous.
This man has been “lynched” by the media and the politicians and will not get a fair trail if it goes to court.
My thought is that if they Imperial Wizard of the most violent branch of the Ku Klux Klan were able to make a case of self-defense that was not contraindicated by physical or eye-witness tesstimony, he should not be arrested.
If there was any reasonable doubt that he had “hunted down” someone, black, white, or purple, he should not be convicted.
“Hate crime” laws are crimes in themselves.
Yep. It is a small thing but says something to me. I've never met a puke who would have done such a thing going in to the PD.
>>>>This whole topic reminds me of those silly ghosthunters on TV that claim to hear EVPs on their audio tapes.<<<<
Or those idiots from Oregon tromping around in the woods looking for Bigfoot.
I agree. It is sad and it should be criminal the way media has participated and manipulated things.
http://www.paranormalghost.com/evp_frequency_ranges.htm
the audio frequency ability of the cell phone is controlling, was it a wideband cell phone ? What equipment was used to record the calls, what frequency response-likely wider than the cell phone.
“The garbled word that raised controversy was “punks,” not “coons,” said Tom Owen, chairman emeritus of the American Board of Recorded Evidence. “
Is it just me, or do I get the feeling that the word “punks” will be a racist term by this weekend?
There is no evidence that Trayvon wasn’t a punk, like every gangsta’ thug. Whether or not Trayvon got what was coming is a matter the DA, cops, and maybe the courts will have to decide.
While it is getting worked out, white people better start traveling in well armed groups. There are a lot of punks out there looking to hurt and kill innocent crackers. Defend yourselves with deadly force.
So any noise transmitted through a phone will be already be band-passed filtered into the vocal range.
For instance, if Zimmerman slammed his truck door at the exact time he said the word “cold”, it would be difficult to separate the 2 sounds once they become one audio file.
A whisper?
And “Punk” and “Coon” sound so similar.
Geez Louise. CNN won’t be happy until Zimmerman is lynched.
You obviously didn’t read the comment I was responding to. And yes you are stupid for participating. I was stupid for responding. We’re all stupid. Please respond! LOL
It’s make-up-a-word time with Tom Owen, your favorite partisan hack audio analyst!
And you are right also. Preparedness and being informed are important.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.