This is interesting to me because the feminists are going berserk. The thing is, the bill does not ban abortion in Mississippi. What the bill does is make sure that a board certified OB/GYN with hospital admitting privelages is doing the abortions. In effect, it makes abortion safer for women (although certainly not the innocent child). You think they would want that. The fact that the abortionists they have on staff can't meet those qualifications and the fact that they can't find any in the state to keep the clinic going, says something about the safety. We have seen time and time again that abortion clinics are not held to the same inspection standards and have the lowest of the low in the medical profession, but the feminists don't fight to change that. It isn't about it being safe and legal. It's about it being legal. Period.
1 posted on
04/05/2012 1:18:56 AM PDT by
Pinkbell
To: wagglebee; little jeremiah; narses
2 posted on
04/05/2012 1:19:40 AM PDT by
Pinkbell
(Rick Santorum For President (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N89LGhm-Ztc))
To: Pinkbell
Thanks for posting this. I think this is an excellent piece of legislation
To: Pinkbell
“The South will rise again!”
4 posted on
04/05/2012 5:54:05 AM PDT by
onedoug
To: Pinkbell
We have seen time and time again that abortion clinics are not held to the same inspection standards and have the lowest of the low in the medical profession, but the feminists don't fight to change that. It isn't about it being safe and legal. It's about it being legal. Period.The filthy fact is, your average beauty parlor has more regulation than any abortion 'clinic'. More than keeping it legal, it is about the 'benjamins'...
the infowarrior
To: Pinkbell
TX and MS are doing a great thing, in spite of Obama, in regulating the abortion industry and limiting its access and power. Good for them. In the long run, they are doing women a huge favor. Women who carry their pregnancies to term will have healthier lives, not to mention the mental (psychological) aspect of abortion on a person later on. Feminists refuse to listen to scientific data on abortion and its after-effects, and they say that Christians are the anti-science ones!
6 posted on
04/05/2012 6:54:57 AM PDT by
Shery
(in APO Land)
To: Pinkbell; LadyDoc
How hard is it for a doctor to get admitting privileges to a local hospital anyway?
7 posted on
04/07/2012 5:20:02 PM PDT by
Morgana
(I only come here to see what happens next. It normally does.)
To: Pinkbell
9 posted on
04/13/2012 7:08:10 PM PDT by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: Pinkbell; lilycicero; MaryLou1; glock rocks; JPG; Monkey Face; RIghtwardHo; pieces of time; ...
+
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Add me / Remove me
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
10 posted on
04/13/2012 7:18:15 PM PDT by
narses
To: Pinkbell
Very good. Under the Roe v. Wade regime tactics like this are probably the only avenue of struggle that was left available.
However, American people should take note: a duly elected state legislature cannot simply ban abortion in the state that elected it. It has to regulate the hell out of it, or go over a near impossible hurdle of passing constitutional amendment.
Freedom and democracy, anyone?
11 posted on
04/14/2012 7:45:43 AM PDT by
annalex
(http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson