The fact that Fuddy has allowed a forgery to be presented as if it was genuine, without saying anything to clarify that, constitutes misprision of forgery and perjury - federal felonies.
I have no doubts whatsoever that the HDOH has engaged in criminal activity. I do agree with bluecat6’s assessment, though, that Fuddy is the one who has jumped in with both feet, although I also believe Okubo could be criminally liable because I believe she knew that Sunahara’s BC# was stolen. I don’t believe they told anybody else that it was, though, because some poor innocent secretary didn’t know to my Sunahara request was related to Obama, so she didn’t send it to Okubo like all the Obama requests were supposed to be and instead followed the proper protocol, checking the database and telling me that there was no birth record under Sunahara’s name in their database at that time. Okubo was the guard-dog who was supposed to intercept anything about Obama and do the necessary obstruction and lying. She knew. Of that I am convinced.
Yes. Fuddy must have given them something. And since what was released wad done by the WH the forgery/alteration/modification, etc. could have happened outside of HDOH and by WH staff. But Fuddy can not be allowed stay free if and when it is shown that she stayed silent while a fraud was committed with her letter as cover.
She came in after the iniital nominee for HDOH Director was hustled off and smeared with unsubstantiated claims of wrongdoing. So they went and go a good party person to oversee the coverup at HDOH. Okubo was queen until then. A lifer. Probably tied heavily to the Democratic party since it has ruled Hawaii since 1959. Even thing with Fukinos name were probably done by Okubo. She had a good run going until the Attorney General would not back up her claim that she rain the ‘natural born American citizen’ statement from the July 27, 2009 statement.
I would also put Schatz in the group the that had tried to play this game playing along with the Chicago thugs without ‘directly’ crossing the line.
His submission of an invalid candidate form in 2008 could be construed as attempt to defraud the elections committee. Had it been a simple ‘mistake’ they probably would have kicked it back and said fix it and resubmit. But he intentionally and knowingly submitted legally invalid - and therefor worthless - documents to the election committee. He clearly does not want to be on the record as endorsing that Obama is constitutionally eligible. So he wanted to avoid that. But did he commit fraud in an effort to not commit....fraud.
And this is exactly what I cannot seemingly get through to anybody. If ANYONE ELSE created that document, it *IS* a criminal offense, and the DOH officials CAN be accused of misprision of a felony.
Again, It's Sherlock Holmes all over again.
“Is there any point to which you would wish to draw my attention?”
“To the curious incident of the dog in the night-time.”
“The dog did nothing in the night-time.”
“That was the curious incident,” remarked Sherlock Holmes.
- “Silver Blaze”
So why aren't the Dogs in Hawaii barking? Because they know there *IS* no crime in the way this forged document was produced.