And this is exactly what I cannot seemingly get through to anybody. If ANYONE ELSE created that document, it *IS* a criminal offense, and the DOH officials CAN be accused of misprision of a felony.
Again, It's Sherlock Holmes all over again.
“Is there any point to which you would wish to draw my attention?”
“To the curious incident of the dog in the night-time.”
“The dog did nothing in the night-time.”
“That was the curious incident,” remarked Sherlock Holmes.
- “Silver Blaze”
So why aren't the Dogs in Hawaii barking? Because they know there *IS* no crime in the way this forged document was produced.
If this was a document created to replace an original BC after an adoption it would have been on a piece of paper that was created whenever Obama was adopted.
Do you acknowledge that? Do you acknowledge that if Obama was adopted in 1968, for instance, there would be a paper BC created in 1968 that had all the information on it? Do you acknowledge that that paper would be inserted into the HDOH file and from then on would be copied and copies certified just like any other and thus any scan of a copy actually made by the HDOH would thus act just like any other original or supplemental BC in their office?
If a paper BC was created whenever Obama was adopted and it was photocopied, stamped, and certified in 2011, and then somebody took a scan of that certified copy and posted it online, how and why would that scan act any different than a scan of any other certified BC put out by the HDOH?
If you take a certified copy of your BC - which was created after an adoption - and scan it and post it online do you get a registrar’s stamp that you can move to different spots on the page? Can you do anything to that scanned document to get the registrar’s stamp to act that way?