Skip to comments.
Controversial new Santorum ad: “Welcome to Obamaville”
Hot Air ^
| 3/23/12
| Allahpundit
Posted on 03/23/2012 5:44:24 PM PDT by Nachum
Watch the spot first and try to guess which part has been flagged as controversial before you click here to check your answer. I knew hed get rapped for it the moment I saw the ad this morning, and if a dummy like me saw it coming, its hard to see how his ad team didnt. Or maybe, having consumed online political media voraciously for the past six years (burp), my sense of what gets them to perk up is simply better honed than Team Sweater Vests? Either way, heres their adamant denial that they were equating anyone with anyone else. No worries, guys: Our bipartisan debt bomb will get us before the Iranian bomb does.
Dave Weigel calls this Umbrage Bait designed to offend Team O and get them talking the (implied) charge. Maybe, but Im not sure how that moves Santorum one inch closer to the goal line of beating Romney.
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ad; controversial; kenyanbornmuzzie; mittromney; newtgingrich; obamaville; ricksantorum; santorum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
I sorta like it.
1
posted on
03/23/2012 5:44:28 PM PDT
by
Nachum
To: Nachum
2
posted on
03/23/2012 5:47:51 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: Nachum
Looks like a fine ad to me. Would have been nice if all the candidates and their superPAC’s had been on the air constantly with these sorts of spots attacking Hussein for the last 6 months.
To: Nachum
Obamaville - Pottersville ...all the same
4
posted on
03/23/2012 5:50:49 PM PDT
by
NordP
(Common Sense ConservaTEAves - Love of Country, Less Govt, Stop Spending, No Govt Run Health Care!!!)
To: Nachum
5
posted on
03/23/2012 5:52:37 PM PDT
by
Huskrrrr
To: Nachum
6
posted on
03/23/2012 5:53:16 PM PDT
by
ptsal
(E)
To: Nachum
Allahpundit jumped the shark years ago.
7
posted on
03/23/2012 5:53:16 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Nachum
Controversial = Very Very Effective Ad!
8
posted on
03/23/2012 5:54:30 PM PDT
by
Artcore
To: Nachum
Pretty good ad. If anyone thinks that these candidates aren’t going to be attacked for everthing they do, they must have lived in Obamaville too long.
Gonna be ugly for any Not Romney for here on out. GOP-e wants this race wrapped up.
9
posted on
03/23/2012 5:54:51 PM PDT
by
dforest
To: Nachum; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; Impy; GOPsterinMA; randita; Sun; BillyBoy; LdSentinal; ...
This is a really good ad.
10
posted on
03/23/2012 5:55:03 PM PDT
by
Clintonfatigued
(A chameleon belongs in a pet store, not the White House)
To: Longbow1969
Looks like a great ad to me.
11
posted on
03/23/2012 5:56:23 PM PDT
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: Nachum
12
posted on
03/23/2012 5:59:46 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: Nachum
Must be tailored for a younger crowd,bored me.
13
posted on
03/23/2012 6:02:15 PM PDT
by
mdittmar
To: cripplecreek
Kind of like the song “Wastin’ away in Obamaville...”
14
posted on
03/23/2012 6:02:15 PM PDT
by
Nachum
(The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
To: Nachum
Looks good to me - depicts with chilling prescience the Serlingesque dystopianism awaiting us in Obama's second term.
Nos genuflectitur ad non princeps sed Princeps Pacem!
Listen, O isles, unto me; and hearken, ye people, from far; The LORD hath called me from the womb; from the bowels of my mother hath he made mention of my name. (Isaiah 49:1 KJV)
15
posted on
03/23/2012 6:05:12 PM PDT
by
ConorMacNessa
(HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines RVN 1969 - St. Michael the Archangel defend us in Battle!)
To: Nachum
If the left is angry with the ad, it is because it is a harsh attack on the Obama-messiah and not on the other Republicans.
16
posted on
03/23/2012 6:06:47 PM PDT
by
rmlew
("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
To: Nachum
As if telling the truth is controversial.
Great ad.
I remember when just calling a politician a liberal was the kiss of death - liberal politicians squealed like stuck pigs when it was used. So of course the GOP obliged them by no longer using the term.
Obama is a jihadi sympathizing anti American socialist. Since there's nothing to lose and everything to gain, why not just tell the truth & the bleating MSM be damned?
17
posted on
03/23/2012 6:15:35 PM PDT
by
skeeter
To: Nachum
If that is “controversial” they should see the ads I would be running in their location.
18
posted on
03/23/2012 6:18:54 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
To: Nachum
19
posted on
03/23/2012 6:24:04 PM PDT
by
Michael.SF.
(When you hear hooves, think horses, not zebras.)
To: Nachum
20
posted on
03/23/2012 6:24:23 PM PDT
by
Michael.SF.
(When you hear hooves, think horses, not zebras.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson