Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Americans Elect: Obama's Third-Party Tar Pit
American Thinker ^ | January 3, 2012 | Jared E. Peterson

Posted on 03/15/2012 9:04:38 AM PDT by jmstein7

The real action that may well decide our next president is quietly going on elsewhere, in the state offices that qualify candidates and parties for the November 2012 presidential ballot. You may not have heard much about a shadowy group called "Americans Elect" (it does not disclose its contributors because of alleged concerns that they might suffer loss of business or social contacts, and because it fancifully but only occasionally declares itself to be a 501[c] [4] tax-exempt organization [though it has qualified as a political party for ballot position in multiple states including Ohio, California, Nevada, and Arizona, which should deprive it of tax-exempt status]). But if you haven't heard of Americans Elect, you soon will.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: americanselect; election2012; kenyanbornmuzzie; mittromney; newtgingrich; ricksantorum
People must start becoming aware of this dangerous third-party spoiler scam!
1 posted on 03/15/2012 9:04:44 AM PDT by jmstein7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

The fact that they were trying to get John Huntsman to run as their candidate tells me all I need to know.

On the other hand it could be good for conservatives in the sense that it would split our “moderate” opposition.


2 posted on 03/15/2012 9:08:39 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7; All

First of all, the nominee of this Party will get about as many votes as any other unknown Third Party like the Constitution Party or Socialist Workers’ Party. But, there is talk that Dennis Kucinich might be the nominee for Americans Elect Party. I’d love to see that.


3 posted on 03/15/2012 9:11:35 AM PDT by no dems (No RINO-Rom, no Kook-Daddy; Newt or Rick must win the nomination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

If the GOP doesn’t nominate Romney then this turd party won’t matter.


4 posted on 03/15/2012 9:12:02 AM PDT by MeganC (No way in Hell am I voting for Mitt Romney. Not now, not ever. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
I think this would take more votes from Ubama.

He is not the genius we are told he is.

He is the epitome of the affirmative action Peter principle.

5 posted on 03/15/2012 9:12:12 AM PDT by Joe the Pimpernel (Islam is a religion of peace, and Moslems reserve the right to behead anyone who says otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
If this were come to fruition and gave Obama the election, it might be the nail in the coffin and cause some civil unrest. We'd be no different then from these middleastern and communist election shows.

It would solidify the sentiment that we have truly fallen to a tyrannical government, a tyrannical group of power hungry rulers. They will have intentionally manipulated the election to ensure their ongoing rule of the nation.

Following that and the contempt that would erupt from the right (real contempt - not “he stole the election” or “a court appointed president”), new laws and policies would be enacted to allow for preemptive legal enforcement against newly defined “radicals and threats against the government.”

This president is proving that he doesn't need congress to control citizens regardless of the constitution.

6 posted on 03/15/2012 9:25:46 AM PDT by Tenacious 1 (With regards to the GOP: I am prodisestablishmentarianistic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

But the GOP-e is going to push Romney down our throats, no matter what they have to do. So we may need to consider this alternative. Think about Palin or Gingrich running this way with tea party support.


7 posted on 03/15/2012 9:35:42 AM PDT by tentmaker (vote for John Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1

Bring on the Revolution; I’m down for it.


8 posted on 03/15/2012 9:36:36 AM PDT by no dems (No RINO-Rom, no Kook-Daddy; Newt or Rick must win the nomination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
Click on the Americans Elect keyword and see multiple threads on this...also what may be a dup to your thread put up Tuesday.
9 posted on 03/15/2012 9:39:34 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The Global Warming HOAX is about Global Governance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

Trump made a veiled threat to run if Romney wasn’t the nominee.


10 posted on 03/15/2012 9:47:04 AM PDT by gundog (Help us, Nairobi-Wan Kenobi...you're our only hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

Obama’s impeachable activities are enough to make crazy people want a third party this cycle, any place where we can lay our rage and work some of it off.

Unfortunately that is the very trap the Marxists are laying and the very outcome they seek. We can all do the math and understand why they would manipulate toward such an end.

They are driving our opinion, our fury, our energy right up the walls and over to the train station, where we in our rage willingly board the car marked, “THIRD Party”, never to be heard from again.

That train boarding has never worked out well for the boarders, so let’s think of something else.


11 posted on 03/15/2012 9:47:20 AM PDT by RitaOK (LET 'ER RIP, NEWT. Newt knows where all the bodies are buried, because he buried them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

They should run Hillary.


12 posted on 03/15/2012 10:27:37 AM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Gosh, does this mean it’s not on the up-and-up?!? /s

Thanks jmstein7.


13 posted on 03/15/2012 6:11:25 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: no dems
Constitution Party

Yaaaay! Ed Phillips!!! Three cheers for Ed! Hip hip! ...oh, never mind....

14 posted on 03/15/2012 6:14:31 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty ("If the past sits in judgment on the present, the future will be lost." --Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

We need to have instant runoff or ranked choice ballots so that a third party can never be a spoiler again. It’s silly to have a ballot that doesn’t accurately count people’s preferences, e.g. their second and third place choices if their first place choice does not win.


15 posted on 03/15/2012 6:16:08 PM PDT by JediJones (The Divided States of Obama's Declaration of Dependence: Death, Taxes and the Pursuit of Crappiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson