Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Howard Dean Thinks Romney Could Carry Fewer States Than Goldwater
NewsBusters ^

Posted on 03/14/2012 9:01:30 PM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest

Could Howard Dean be the worst political prognosticator ever? Could a former DNC Chairman really be this clueless about the electoral map? Apparently.

On MSNBC's Ed Show this evening, Dean claimed it was possible that in a match-up against Barack Obama, Mitt Romney might win fewer than the six states Barry Goldwater carried in 1964. Seriously, Dr. Dean? You see President Barack Obama carrying, oh, I don't know, Oklahoma, Kansas, Texas, Nebraska and Idaho--all states Goldwater lost--plus some others Goldwater won. Utah, maybe?

View the video here,

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012presidential; alsoran; barrygoldwater; doctordean; howarddean; kenyanbornmuzzie; loser; mittromney; newtgingrich; ricksantorum; rino; yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: governsleastgovernsbest

Interesting that since that electoral map was formed in `64, Minnesota has gone GOP only once (1972). Even the Peoples Republics of HI, MA and VT have more recency as “red” states.


21 posted on 03/15/2012 2:03:37 AM PDT by ScottinVA (A single drop of American blood for muslims is one drop too many!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Dean may be right.

About 70% of Primary voters are voting against Romney, and many of his current primary voters in this race voted for Obama in 2008 against Palin.

Not since Abe Lincoln's election in 1860, with major parties split six or eight ways from Sunday, has the electoral situation so much favored a third-party win.

Romney and Obama would be competing for many of the same voters -- liberal Republicans and liberal Democrats -- totaling only half of the voters in a general election.

I would prefer an Open Convention with a conservative Republican to run against Obama. Barring that, our best chance to save mankind is a direct hit from that asteroid resulting in a near ELE.

22 posted on 03/15/2012 2:19:49 AM PDT by meadsjn (Sarah 2012, or sooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Romney is Dole with better hair. We have a real chance with a president who has approval ratings at 40% or less, but we are going to blow it.

Obama has a much larger solid base of people who will vote for him even if the country is aflame, no matter what.

There are large portions of our base who will refuse to vote for Romney.

I can’t believe it. I think Romney will be the candidate. We have allowed the MSM to pick our candidate for us AGAIN.


23 posted on 03/15/2012 3:35:04 AM PDT by rlmorel (A knife in the chest from a unapologetic liberal is preferable to a knife in the back from a RINO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Personally, I’m finding these projections for 2012 have become a big puzzle.

They’re all over the board, with some saying Obama’s toast and others saying he’s a shoo-in.

It can’t be both, and the thought of voters sticking with Obama after the past three moronic years is unspeakably depressing.

Can Americans really be this stupid?


24 posted on 03/15/2012 4:22:25 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Even tho I actually am dreading the idea of a Romney nomination, if he is the nominee, he will carry more states than Goldwater in ‘64. We’ve become far more set politically/geographically.

Also, Obama doesn’t have the post-JFK assassination sympathy/ shock/vote going for him. At the time Goldwater was looked at as an extremist by a huge part of the population; his views today would be considered mainstream conservative; Romney is considerably more oderate-liberal (wishy-washy) than Goldwater (to put it mildly).


25 posted on 03/15/2012 9:05:14 AM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
We have allowed the MSM to pick our candidate for us AGAIN.

Looks more to me that the GOP elitists and the MSM worked together (in a manner of speaking) to choose our candidate.

This whole Pubbie primary process smells like week old diapers to me.

26 posted on 03/15/2012 3:26:56 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer
Can Americans really be this stupid?

Yes, they can, they are, and they will be again.

Every day that I talk to my BIL, his idiot wife and his New Deal uncle I am more convinced than ever that we are totally screwed.

You know that alcoholics can rationalize anything to support their drinking. Well, liberals make them look like amateurs.

27 posted on 03/15/2012 3:31:14 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s
You know that alcoholics can rationalize anything to support their drinking. Well, liberals make them look like amateurs.

The other day a reporter interviewed a lady that is really having a hard time. Her husband lost his good job and the job he has now pays little more than minimum wage, her job has really cut her hours; their home was forclosed on and one of their vehicles was reposessed. The woman was telling the reporter they could barely afford fuel to get to work and groceries to feed the family. All this and when the reporter asked her who she planned to vote for she said Obama because all this is not his fault and he is doing the best he can.

28 posted on 03/15/2012 3:44:50 PM PDT by Tammy8 (~Secure the border and deport all illegals- do it now! ~ Support our Troops!~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Good plan. Give Obama a chance to pack the federal courts for decades...


29 posted on 03/17/2012 6:25:10 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson