Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jennifer Aniston spends almost $400 a day on her body, report says
Fox News ^ | March 14, 2012 | New York Post

Posted on 03/14/2012 1:37:29 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie

Jennifer Aniston was recently dubbed the "Hottest Woman of All Time" by Men's Health magazine but, according to a new report, the "Wanderlust" spends $141, 037 a year maintaining her appearance.

That breaks down to almost $400 each and every day.

The website Shine has broken down what Aniston spends to retain her youthful glow, her golden locks and her taut body, based on the products and services that the star has sung the praises of.

Aniston recently revealed to Conan O'Brien that she is a fan of expensive laser peels, which cost $295 a pop, even if they leave her looking like a "battered burn victim for a week."

In addition, Aniston reportedly uses a $450 neck ointment by Euoko, and Mila Moursi Rejuvenating Serum which costs $350. She also regularly splurges on Tracie Martyn Red Carpet Facials that costs a reported $450. The star also uses a slew of other products, in addition to cosmetics.

As for Aniston's hair, her cuts with Chris McMillan, the creator of "The Rachel," cost a reported $600. The star also gets highlights from colorist Michael Canale, whose rate is reportedly $320.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-163 next last
To: Norm Lenhart
This GenXer grew up watching classic TV shows on indy channels and I quite agree. So many amazingly attractive women from the 1940s through the 1960s. Hell, there were some cuties on TV in the 1980s such as Stephanie Zimbalist.
81 posted on 03/14/2012 2:40:50 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

So true. I always saw Ball as a great comedienne...never really ‘looked’ at her beyond that. Then I saw an early promo/publicity still somewhere. My God that woman was gorgeous...then again I always had a thing for Redheads, so I’m biased ;)


82 posted on 03/14/2012 2:41:43 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: baddog 219

That reminds me, I need to purchase two pickets to Tittsburgh......uh I mean two tickets to Pittsburgh.


83 posted on 03/14/2012 2:41:52 PM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
"I see that Natalie Wood is on your list. I quite agree; she was an extraordinary beauty."

Another vote for Natalie Wood. Her bubbly, perky personality just added to her considerable beauty.

84 posted on 03/14/2012 2:42:28 PM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie
The discussion begins and ends here.


85 posted on 03/14/2012 2:45:02 PM PDT by TexasNative2000 (Jimmy Carter's incompetence + Richard Nixon's paranoia = Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

Can’t think of her name right now, but the girl from “Valley Girl” was another.

Trivia - the ‘pneumatic’ blond in that movie (another hottie) went on to do cartoon voices on Rugrats and others and is an accomplished guitarist.


86 posted on 03/14/2012 2:45:45 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: TexasNative2000
Heck, she was hot even in cartoon form


87 posted on 03/14/2012 2:46:12 PM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie
In Jennifer Aniston's defense:

I'D HIT IT.

88 posted on 03/14/2012 2:46:33 PM PDT by SIDENET ("If that's your best, your best won't do." -Dee Snider)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

That and those dark, sultry eyes. Egad, those hauntingly beautiful eyes.


89 posted on 03/14/2012 2:47:52 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

Lucille Ball was also in an early Three Stooges short back in the 30s.


90 posted on 03/14/2012 2:48:17 PM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
That and those dark, sultry eyes. Egad, those hauntingly beautiful eyes.

She was one of those Russian women that wasn't going to wind up looking like a Babushka.

91 posted on 03/14/2012 2:49:25 PM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

I bet you are correct.

There is NOTHING special about her.

She is easily substituted for some other female in ALL her movies. There is not “hers” role. (other than the utterly dislikable character from her friends days)


92 posted on 03/14/2012 2:49:49 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SIDENET

you can have it.


93 posted on 03/14/2012 2:50:08 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

According to IMDB, the female lead was Deborah Foreman, and the girl with the bosoms was Elizabeth Daily. It’s funny that Nicholas Cage was the breakout star from that. I was the target audience, high-school junior in 1983, and I didn’t think he was cute at all. Still don’t.


94 posted on 03/14/2012 2:50:17 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Oh, good Lord. Pat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Grace Kelly


95 posted on 03/14/2012 2:50:41 PM PDT by dandiegirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

How come the 99ers aren’t protesting Hollywood Greed!!!


96 posted on 03/14/2012 2:50:53 PM PDT by doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

She needs to become a poor struggling actress again. She looked much better in her pre-anorexia days.


97 posted on 03/14/2012 2:51:04 PM PDT by Professional Engineer (Never Again! Except for the next time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie
I love these threads.

Every time one is posted, all the old farts come in and tell us how some silent movie chick was the hottest ever.

The antique black-n-white photos are always sure to follow.

98 posted on 03/14/2012 2:52:15 PM PDT by AAABEST (Et lux in tenebris lucet: et tenebrae eam non comprehenderunt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SIDENET
In Jennifer Aniston's defense: I'D HIT IT.

You'd have to do it, Philly style....."Uhh....Get Out!" (with apologies to Andrew Dice Clay)

99 posted on 03/14/2012 2:52:20 PM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Professional Engineer

She was never a poor, struggling actress. She’s part of a Hollywood dynasty.


100 posted on 03/14/2012 2:53:42 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Oh, good Lord. Pat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-163 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson