Posted on 03/14/2012 1:37:29 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie
Jennifer Aniston was recently dubbed the "Hottest Woman of All Time" by Men's Health magazine but, according to a new report, the "Wanderlust" spends $141, 037 a year maintaining her appearance.
That breaks down to almost $400 each and every day.
The website Shine has broken down what Aniston spends to retain her youthful glow, her golden locks and her taut body, based on the products and services that the star has sung the praises of.
Aniston recently revealed to Conan O'Brien that she is a fan of expensive laser peels, which cost $295 a pop, even if they leave her looking like a "battered burn victim for a week."
In addition, Aniston reportedly uses a $450 neck ointment by Euoko, and Mila Moursi Rejuvenating Serum which costs $350. She also regularly splurges on Tracie Martyn Red Carpet Facials that costs a reported $450. The star also uses a slew of other products, in addition to cosmetics.
As for Aniston's hair, her cuts with Chris McMillan, the creator of "The Rachel," cost a reported $600. The star also gets highlights from colorist Michael Canale, whose rate is reportedly $320.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
So true. I always saw Ball as a great comedienne...never really ‘looked’ at her beyond that. Then I saw an early promo/publicity still somewhere. My God that woman was gorgeous...then again I always had a thing for Redheads, so I’m biased ;)
That reminds me, I need to purchase two pickets to Tittsburgh......uh I mean two tickets to Pittsburgh.
Another vote for Natalie Wood. Her bubbly, perky personality just added to her considerable beauty.
Can’t think of her name right now, but the girl from “Valley Girl” was another.
Trivia - the ‘pneumatic’ blond in that movie (another hottie) went on to do cartoon voices on Rugrats and others and is an accomplished guitarist.
I'D HIT IT.
That and those dark, sultry eyes. Egad, those hauntingly beautiful eyes.
Lucille Ball was also in an early Three Stooges short back in the 30s.
She was one of those Russian women that wasn't going to wind up looking like a Babushka.
I bet you are correct.
There is NOTHING special about her.
She is easily substituted for some other female in ALL her movies. There is not “hers” role. (other than the utterly dislikable character from her friends days)
you can have it.
According to IMDB, the female lead was Deborah Foreman, and the girl with the bosoms was Elizabeth Daily. It’s funny that Nicholas Cage was the breakout star from that. I was the target audience, high-school junior in 1983, and I didn’t think he was cute at all. Still don’t.
Grace Kelly
How come the 99ers aren’t protesting Hollywood Greed!!!
She needs to become a poor struggling actress again. She looked much better in her pre-anorexia days.
Every time one is posted, all the old farts come in and tell us how some silent movie chick was the hottest ever.
The antique black-n-white photos are always sure to follow.
You'd have to do it, Philly style....."Uhh....Get Out!" (with apologies to Andrew Dice Clay)
She was never a poor, struggling actress. She’s part of a Hollywood dynasty.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.