Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Massive Carbon Release Shrinks Horses to Size of House Cats
Scientific Computing ^ | 3/2/12

Posted on 03/02/2012 9:03:13 AM PST by null and void


An illustration of the earliest-known horse, Sifrhippus, dwarfed next to a modern domestic horse. Courtesy of Danielle Byerley, Florida Museum of Natural History

As scientists continue developing climate change projection models, paleontologists studying an extreme short-term global warming event have discovered direct evidence about how mammals respond to rising temperatures. In a study appearing in Science February 24, 2012, researchers from eight institutions, led by scientists from the University of Florida and University of Nebraska, found a correlation between temperature and body size in mammals by following the evolution of the earliest horses about 56 million years ago: As temperatures increased, their body size decreased.

“Horses started out small, about the size of a small dog like a miniature schnauzer,” said co-author Jonathan Bloch, associate curator of vertebrate paleontology at the Florida Museum of Natural History on the UF campus. “What’s surprising is that, after they first appeared, they then became even smaller and then dramatically increased in size, and that exactly corresponds to the global warming event, followed by cooling. It had been known that mammals were small during that time and that it was warm, but we hadn’t understood that temperature specifically was driving the evolution of body size.”

Sifrhippus, the earliest-known horse, first appeared in the North American fossil record during the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum. During this 175,000-year climate event, increased concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and oceans caused average global temperatures to rise 10 to 20 degrees. By analyzing the size and isotopes of fossils collected in Wyoming’s Bighorn Basin, researchers traced the evolution of Sifrhippus from an estimated 12-pound animal that shrank during a 130,000-year period by about 30 percent to 8.5 pounds — the size of a small house cat — then increased to about 15 pounds during the next 45,000 years.

“This is the highest-resolution terrestrial record of its kind from anywhere in the world, and it shows how climate changed in Wyoming at that time,” said lead author Ross Secord, who began geochemical analysis of the horse teeth and other mammals as a postdoctoral researcher with Bloch before joining the University of Nebraska-Lincoln in 2008. “When Jon and I started plotting oxygen data from the mass spectrometer, we could immediately see that the shifts in size of horses and temperature were mirror images of each other.”

Bloch said the project began about seven years ago when former UF student and study co-author Stephen Chester, now an anthropology doctoral candidate at Yale University, measured horse teeth that seemed to be too large for their age and became smaller through the geologic section. The findings raise important questions about how animals might respond to future rapid climate change.

“We’re seeing about a third of the mammals getting smaller, and some of them getting a lot smaller, by as much as half of their original body size,” Secord said. “Because warming happened much slower during the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, mammals had more time to adjust their body size. So, it’s not clear that we’re going to see the same thing happening in the near future, but we might.”

Philip Gingerich, who first recorded the phenomenon of decreasing body size during the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum in 1989, said the study documentation clearly demonstrates the relationship between temperature and body size. He agrees this may occur as a result of current warming patterns.

“I joke about this all the time — we’re going to be walking around three feet tall if we keep going the way we’re going,” said Gingerich, a researcher at the University of Michigan and director of its Museum of Paleontology. “Maybe that’s not all bad and, if that’s the worst it gets, it will be fine. You can either adapt, or you go extinct, or you can move, and there’s not a lot of place to move anymore, so I think it’s a matter of adaptation and becoming smaller.”

Researchers also analyzed correlations with aridity and carbon dioxide levels, but found temperature to be the most likely driving factor in body size. Although little is known about how animals arrived in North America at that time, the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM) is a significant event in geologic time in terms of mammalian history, Bloch said.

“The PETM is really important, because it marks the beginning for the first appearance of several major groups of mammals, including crown-group primates (ancestors of modern primates) and the first even- and odd-toed modern ungulates (mammals with hooves),” Bloch said. “This sets the scene for the entire diversity of animals we see on the planet today.”

Study co-authors include Doug Boyer of Brooklyn College, Aaron Wood of South Dakota School of Mines and Technology and the Florida Museum, Scott Wing of the Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History, Mary Kraus of the University of Colorado, Francesca McInerney of Northwestern University and John Krigbaum of UF.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Tenacious 1
The whole study (if that’s what they call it) was based on a premise that is theorized at best and fictional at worst.

Sounds like a typical place for a liberal to start...

21 posted on 03/02/2012 10:00:53 AM PST by GOPJ (GAS WAS $1.85 per gallon on the day Obama was Inaugurated! - - freeper Gaffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: null and void

” Massive Carbon Release Shrinks Horses to Size of House Cats”

On the plus side, cats were enlarged to the size of houses.

Of course, houses were somewhat smaller then, about the size of an artificially enlarged doormouse, or a shriveled Cheshire cat.


22 posted on 03/02/2012 10:08:45 AM PST by Humble Servant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Thieves in Florida can walk right under your locked door. Of course, all they can steal is a lint ball.


23 posted on 03/02/2012 10:09:14 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBigIf

We (meaning all us humans) were quite a bit smaller if you go back 200-300 years. Look at the below-decks space on sailing ships, or the average size of armor, or clothes, or beds.

So it is possible for our size to me “modulated” by circumstance. better food distribution, pesticides, heated buildings, awareness of nutrition factors, medicine, and broadened interbreeding all conspired to make us bigger. Maybe 500 years from now we’ll be bigger yet, or smaller 9see, like global warming’ I’ll cover all of the bases), or maybe the same size.


24 posted on 03/02/2012 10:12:55 AM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DBrow
The article has a very misleading title. The horse shrunk from Big-House-Cat size to Average-House-Cat size, a weight reduction of 30%.

Aw shucks!

That would have been a horse I could afford to keep.

I've always wanted to belong to the equestrian class.

25 posted on 03/02/2012 10:14:37 AM PST by tsomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: peeps36
Generally, in mammals the ratio of surface area to volume increases, which is good for retaining heat, as the climate gets colder. That resulted in large mammoths, bears, cats and beavers during the last ice age. Today, northern mammals, such as grizzly and polar bears, Siberian tigers and snow hares tend to be larger than their tropical counterparts. This is not true of cold-blooded beasts such as snakes and lizards.

However, many other things affect size. For example, there's the "island effect" which causes Indonesian hippos, rhinos, and elephants (and perhaps even humans such as the Flores Hobbit man) to be much smaller than their African relatives. Changing food supplies and introduction of new species also affect size.

Therefore, for these scientists to say that global warming caused this one type of animal to shrink is really stretching for a reason.

26 posted on 03/02/2012 10:28:34 AM PST by VanShuyten ("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

Easy, globull warming causes everything from acne to cold weather to earthquakes.


27 posted on 03/02/2012 10:31:26 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

How do they know which is the cause and which is the effect?


Bingo! It was size increasing horses that caused the global warming.


28 posted on 03/02/2012 10:34:10 AM PST by cornfedcowboy (Trust in God, but empty the clip.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: null and void
In a study appearing in Science February 24, 2012, researchers from eight institutions, led by scientists from the University of Florida and University of Nebraska, found a correlation between temperature and body size in mammals

PATENT BULLSHIT!!

29 posted on 03/02/2012 10:48:29 AM PST by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsomer

“That would have been a horse I could afford to keep. “

Easier to herd than cats, too, I bet.


30 posted on 03/02/2012 10:49:01 AM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: cornfedcowboy
Makes perfect sense. They already blame cow flatulence for global warming. Horses must fart as well.

Therefore larger horses means a greater volume of horse flatulence; ergo, increased global warming!

31 posted on 03/02/2012 11:09:12 AM PST by catman67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Hard to believe what passes as science today...

Not very long ago....this article would be considered written by a crackpot...


32 posted on 03/02/2012 11:09:13 AM PST by Popman (America is squandering its wealth on riotous living, war, and welfare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Popman

How much did this cost the taxpayers


33 posted on 03/02/2012 12:07:58 PM PST by Digger (If RINO is your selection then failure is your election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
How do they know which is the cause and which is the effect?

Not only don't they know which is the cause and which is the effect, they do NOT know if there is a cause and an effect. That is why these "global warming" "scientists" are not scientists. They mistake correlation for causality.

Here is an example of their illogic:

98 percent of Americans involved in traffic accidents had eaten potatoes within 24 hours of the accident. The conclusions of those nitwits would be:

(1) Consuming potatoes causes traffic accidents.

Banning the consumption of potatoes will save billions in damage to automobiles and about 41,000 American lives on the roads each year.

You end up with nonsense like this when the schools stop teaching scientific principles and methods and start teaching the religion of Al Gorism.

34 posted on 03/02/2012 1:58:57 PM PST by MIchaelTArchangel (Romney ruined Massachusetts. Now he wants to ruin the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson