[Graewoulf]

” - - - speaks volumes about how the press intends to bury this whole issue.”

Yep, it sure worked on me as I was so disappointed that no proof was given in the article that I jumped to the conclusion that the article was accurate.

Thanks to you, my angry FRiends, you were kind enough to hold me accountable for my error of thought and word. THANK YOU!

To Triple: I said/wrote it, so I own it, and then apologized for my error. Now I will have to write IMO, and not the tongue-in-cheek one that you read.

My lesson has been indelible to me as I will do thorough due diligence about ANY MSM article in the future.

Sincerely,
Graewoulf.

[butterdezillion]

It’s easy for that to happen. Even with those of us who know the media is treasonous - mostly because it takes so much time to check out the original sources (or in this case there was no access to the original source, since they gave no links to anything that would show what really WAS presented at the press conference) and because we can’t believe anybody would be able to get away with what basically amounts to slander of Arpaio by leaving out what he and his posse actually reported.

The only reason they can get away with it, though, is because conservative media has been silenced on this issue through threats. And all we have to do is watch the conservative media ignore this obviously-serious event in AZ, to realize that they really have been silenced. I know these threats for a fact because of other sources I have, but even without those sources the average Joe can know what’s going on just by observing.

[TXnMA]

I will look forward to interacting with you here on FR in the future with considerable respect. You have earned it!

Sincerely,

TXnMA

[TigersEye]

To Triple: I said/wrote it, so I own it, and then apologized for my error.

You're a good man, Graewoulf. We all trip over each other now and then. The beauty of FR is you can't stay on the wrong page for long. :-)