Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Full title: Holder: 1st Amendment Allows Gov't to Force Catholics to Buy Sterilization- Contraception-Abortion Insurance
1 posted on 02/29/2012 9:56:12 AM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


2 posted on 02/29/2012 9:57:17 AM PST by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

This bastard needs to be impeached! If we had a Congress that had a pair he would be. The facism of this regime is just incredible!!


5 posted on 02/29/2012 10:02:14 AM PST by Marathoner (In the 80s we had Reagan, Johnny Cash and Bob Hope. Now we have Obama, no cash and no hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Eric holder received his law degree for the Closed Before Srikeing School of law.

That’s why he has NO clue as to what the First Amendment says.


6 posted on 02/29/2012 10:04:43 AM PST by puppypusher (The World is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

2012 America:

In which the highest law enforcement official in the land doesn’t possess even a Junior High level understanding of BASIC Constitutional bedrock issues.


7 posted on 02/29/2012 10:04:51 AM PST by EyeGuy (2012: When the Levee Breaks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

After reading the article and watching the video, I don’t think the headline is accurate. He doesn’t seem to be saying the First Amendment allows govt to force...but otoh I don’t understand WHAT he said. Homeless schizos on the NY subway have made more sense.


9 posted on 02/29/2012 10:05:21 AM PST by Lady Lucky (Gingrich 2012: Open Throttle for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
I look forward to the next article in this series:

Catholics: 2nd Amendment Allows Us to Protect our Hospitals from Holder's Goons

11 posted on 02/29/2012 10:09:22 AM PST by DCBryan1 (Id rather have a man who wrecked his marriage as POTUS than a man who wrecked his country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

This administration believes it can do anything it wants without constitutional and/or congressional authorization.

See my tagline.


12 posted on 02/29/2012 10:10:19 AM PST by Erik Latranyi (When religions have to beg the gov't for a waiver, we are already under socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
Holder is following the Obama script. What's next? Mandatory euthanasia for the old, sick and disabled? Conservatives banned from politics and exiled?

Nothing would be a surprise from this crowd.

13 posted on 02/29/2012 10:10:27 AM PST by JPG (Hold on tight; rough road ahead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

He’s walking thru it. He will stink for days.


14 posted on 02/29/2012 10:14:47 AM PST by reefdiver ("Let His day's be few And another takes His office")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

He’s walking thru it. He will stink for days.


15 posted on 02/29/2012 10:14:53 AM PST by reefdiver ("Let His day's be few And another takes His office")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
RE: "1st Amendment Allows Gov't to Force Catholics to Buy Sterilization- Contraception-Abortion,"

Up is down. black is white. war is peace....

Orwell was not a mere novelist he was a modern day prophet delivering predictions in novel form!

Welcome to the Obamanation!

16 posted on 02/29/2012 10:15:36 AM PST by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Congress should be recalled and indicted for misprision
of felony for allowing this travesty.

This country has been seized by coup d’etat.
Justice is a joke.

The rule of law is dead, buried in John Jay’s grave,
stabbed in the heart by SCOTUS.


17 posted on 02/29/2012 10:21:03 AM PST by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Something people need to realize: Muslims and Muslim groups are exempt from Obamacare altogether because an imam has claimed that insurance is gambling and that Islam forbids gambling.

People want to make the contraception issue about whether or not the Catholic teaching is mainstream, whether women need contraceptives, etc. But if the government is going to refuse Catholics the right to practice their religion because its views are not “mainstream”, then they should be asking whether Muslim views on insurance and/or gambling are “mainstream” - and require Muslims to participate in the “mainstream” things they despise.

But they won’t. They never will. Obama’s government will never require Muslim organizations to buy swimming suits for their women to wear around town. They will never require Muslims to buy a pork processing plant. Etc.

The real story of this Obamacare mess is seen most clearly by the fact that the government is SIDING WITH ISLAM AND AGAINST CATHOLICISM. If the government was going to remain religiously neutral then they would do the same thing for Muslims as they do for Catholics as they do for atheists as they do for Amish as they do for Hindus, etc... The Muslims objected to insurance, so the government said, “Never mind.” The Catholics objected to contraception and abortion so the government said, “You have to participate in these things anyway.”

This is a sharia-compliant law. It institutes legal preference for Islam and imposes what amounts to a dhimmi tax on non-Muslims. It affirms government protection of MUSLIM religious freedom while trashing NON-MUSLIM religious freedom.

We need to ask the right questions about this. Specifically, we need to be asking why Muslims are exempt on conscientious grounds if Catholics aren’t also exempt on conscientious grounds.


20 posted on 02/29/2012 10:24:57 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
Interesting how libs can find hidden or implicit "rights" in the Bill of rights. A guy can take a piss on stage and it is considered "freedom of expression" under the 1st amendment. They found a "right to privacy" so as to force abortion on us. But when the Bill of rights explicitly says "freedom of religion" or "right to bear arms"; they don't see it.
27 posted on 02/29/2012 10:54:50 AM PST by Sans-Culotte ( Pray for Obama- Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Insane. I’d rather have Geoffrey Holder as the attorney general. Imagine him laughing his big, booming laugh every time Congress asks him a question. It would definitely be more fun.


28 posted on 02/29/2012 10:58:47 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Occupy DC General Assembly: We are Marxist tools. WE ARE MARXIST TOOLS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

29 posted on 02/29/2012 11:05:04 AM PST by william clark (Ecclesiastes 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Let’s see if I have this straight: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;”

Really means that we can prohibit the free exercise of religion so long as it is mandated by the government.

While: “ the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

Really means that we can infringe on the people’s rght to bear arms, so long as the US government caused gun violence in another soveriegn nation.

The liberal mind is truly a wonderous thing.


32 posted on 02/29/2012 11:27:08 AM PST by CSM (Keeper of the "Dave Ramsey Fan" ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

B.S. This is ridiculous. They will get no support for this.


34 posted on 02/29/2012 11:39:02 AM PST by DallasSun (Courage~Fear that has said its prayers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

It’s in contract law that this mess is going to be overturned.

The government mandate of a PRIVATE SECTOR TRANSACTION subjects the issue to contract law.

A contract has a presumption of mutual consent. If one party can claim coercion, then the contract is null and void.


35 posted on 02/29/2012 11:49:04 AM PST by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

I wonder which nations’ Constitution Mr. Holder is reading?
I wonder if he is getting help with his interpretation from Justice Ginsberg?


36 posted on 02/29/2012 12:44:38 PM PST by GrouchoTex (...and ye shall know the Truth and the Truth shall set you free....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson