Arizona Obama Ballot Challenge Hearing Tomorrow in Tucson
Please go and support Ken Allen. Status hearing is tomorrow at 9am on the forth floor rm 486 of the superior court house in Tucson with Judge Gordon.
Arizona Superior Court in Pima County
110 W. Congress St., Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 740-4200, TDD (520) 740-8887
there is not a judge on the planet who is going to disallow hussein to be on a ballot.
Sincerely wish Mr. Allen the best of luck. Now let me play devil’s advocate.
Why do these people continue to insist as attorney Orion advised Malihi, and as Allen does in this complaint that, “It doesn’t matter where he was born. It never did.” What is possibly gained by that stipulation?
We all know there are two issue, birthplsce and citizen parents. At this time, birthplace is a state issue and the other is a federal issue.
From the complaint at page 3, line 4:
“10. 42 U.S.C. 1988 permits a State’s Common law to decide a court case if there is no adequate Federal remedy.”
California’s Supreme Court, IIRC correctly, did indeed hold there was a federal remedy to the state action before it, and pointed to the Joint Session of Congress, a session specifically called for the sole purpose of certify the election results.
The two-parent issue is a federal issue because it concerns a yet to be rendered interpretation of the Consitution. As attorney Orion also told Malihi, the issue has not yet been resolved judicially. If true, and I believe it is, then a state is not going to touch the two-parent federal issue.
Perhaps the best case result at the state level is that we find a state court that will render a clear ruling on the necessity of a candidate producing certified copies of birth documents to the requesting state.
We need a plaintiff who recognizes that birthplace is an inseparable part of NBC, and who will seek in his complaint a ruling that in order to avoid fraud, it is incumbent upon a state to require the candidates it will send to D.C. to satisfy the birthplace element. How plain and simple is that?
any updates?
Whatever became of that blonde lawyer lady who was so knowledgeable about these issues? The media seems to have blotted her out of existence.
So what happened? It is 48 hrs since your post and 24 hrs since the hearing allegedly started. I would have to assume this is a hoax!
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/arizona-judge-grants-leave-to-amend-obama-ballot-challenge
I am not a lawyer (nor do I play one on TV), but what I get from this is that the judge dismissed the case because the plaintiff didn’t properly serve the defendant, BUT the judge is allowing the plaintiff to amend the complaint and refile, the refiling fee waived if submitted by March 1.
Can those who read legalese better than I correct me if I’m wrong? Thanks!