Skip to comments.
UN atomic agency team 'denied access' to suspected Iran nuclear site
The Australian ^
| February 22, 2012
| AFP
Posted on 02/21/2012 5:18:08 PM PST by John W
The UN atomic agency said Wednesday that "intensive efforts" by its team visiting Iran on the way forward failed, and that they were denied access to a key military site.
"Intensive efforts were made to reach agreement on a document facilitating the clarification of unresolved issues in connection with Iran's nuclear programme," the International Atomic Energy Agency said.
"Unfortunately, agreement was not reached on this document."
The team requested access both during this visit and during a first trip in late January to the Parchin military site where it suspects suspicious nuclear activities are carried out, but Iran "did not grant permission," it said.
"It is disappointing that Iran did not accept our request to visit Parchin during the first or second meetings," IAEA Director General Yukiya Amano said in the statement.
"We engaged in a constructive spirit, but no agreement was reached."
(Excerpt) Read more at theaustralian.com.au ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iran; nuclear; un
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
1
posted on
02/21/2012 5:18:12 PM PST
by
John W
To: John W
In a just world, we would nuke any site within 60 minutes of learning that an investigation team "wasn't allowed" to see what was there.
WHAM!!!
Oh, never mind. I'm sure there's not much there worth seeing. Now, about this facility you have over in the eastern part of Iran ...
2
posted on
02/21/2012 5:21:31 PM PST
by
ClearCase_guy
("And the public gets what the public wants" -- The Jam)
To: John W
Color me shocked. I saw this story this morning, and I knew nothing would come of it because the UN guys have no dicks.
3
posted on
02/21/2012 5:27:47 PM PST
by
Cyber Liberty
("If the past sits in judgment on the present, the future will be lost." --Winston Churchill)
To: ClearCase_guy
Remember how long this went on with Iraq? And how N Korea has been handled?
4
posted on
02/21/2012 5:29:20 PM PST
by
HollyB
To: John W
“You’re bweaking my bawls, Hans...you’re bweaking my bawls.”
5
posted on
02/21/2012 5:29:51 PM PST
by
dfwgator
(Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
To: John W
This is what you get when all you’ve got in your arsenal is hot air, and this outcome was completely predictable, as will be the inevitable response of the Obama Administration: “We are disappointed.”
6
posted on
02/21/2012 5:50:24 PM PST
by
HKMk23
(AVIS: RISQUE DE CHOC ELECTRIQUE — NE PAS OUVRIR.)
To: John W
do I really have to say it???
7
posted on
02/21/2012 6:07:03 PM PST
by
Chode
(American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: ClearCase_guy; John W
Nah, the war can’t start until sometime in September for the best timing in obozo’s re-election campaign. (sarcasm?)
8
posted on
02/21/2012 6:07:03 PM PST
by
dynachrome
("Our forefathers didn't bury their guns. They buried those that tried to take them.")
To: John W
C'mon, this story can't be true, why I recall President George W. Bush stating clearly and without equivocation that Iran "would not be permitted to obtain a nuclear weapons capability" and as we all know, Vice President Dick Cheney and U.N. Ambassador John Bolton strongly urged the President to launch a preemptive strike against Iran (instead of listening to that mealy mouthed amateur SecState Condi Rice who argued against military action) and in November/December 2008, our combination Air Force and Navy strikes with carrier based planes and B-2's from the States decimated the Iranian nuke program and much of their military-industrial infrastructure, and the mullahs ended up hanging from lamp posts in Tehran as the Iranian people rose up in open revolt against their Islamofascist masters.
Don't you all remember this?
Oh yeah. Bush listened to Condi Rice, didn't he?
(Well, it was a nice fantasy)
9
posted on
02/21/2012 6:09:25 PM PST
by
mkjessup
(Romney is to conservatism what e.coli is to an all-you-can-eat salad bar. NO ROMNEY!!!)
To: All
10
posted on
02/21/2012 6:20:04 PM PST
by
onyx
(SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
To: John W
11
posted on
02/21/2012 6:40:08 PM PST
by
EEGator
To: John W
Obama and Hillary will be outraged and express deep concern.
12
posted on
02/21/2012 6:47:06 PM PST
by
doug from upland
(Just in case, it has been reserved: www.TheBitchIsBack2012.com)
13
posted on
02/21/2012 7:28:27 PM PST
by
RedMDer
(Forward With Confidence!)
To: John W
In related news, cats meow, water is wet and the sky is blue. Anyone, except most liberals could have seen this coming.
14
posted on
02/21/2012 9:11:25 PM PST
by
matt04
To: EEGator
15
posted on
02/21/2012 9:26:07 PM PST
by
Drill Thrawl
(The damage is too extensive. Burn it down and start over.)
To: EEGator
OK, Hans. I'll show you. Stand to your reft.
Hans Blix: [Moves to the left]
Kim Jong Il: A rittle more.
Hans Blix: [Moves to the left again]
Kim Jong Il: Good.
16
posted on
02/21/2012 9:34:13 PM PST
by
dfwgator
(Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
To: John W
That did it. Bigerer and tougherer sanctions for Russia and China to ignore while Obama tells Israel to give them a chance to work. This time the biggestest and toughestest sanctions ever.
17
posted on
02/21/2012 10:32:46 PM PST
by
Eleutheria5
(End the occupation. Annex today.)
This goes under atomic testing lore.At Dimona, when the reactors were being inspected in the 1960s they put up false walls and a fake control room before the inspection.
18
posted on
02/21/2012 10:35:45 PM PST
by
U-238
To: U-238
Inspected by whom? Israel is not a signatory of the Non-Proliferation Treaty. Iran is. So on what basis would the IAEA send inspectors and expect access?
19
posted on
02/21/2012 10:57:42 PM PST
by
Eleutheria5
(End the occupation. Annex today.)
To: Eleutheria5
When the United States intelligence community discovered the purpose of the site in the early 1960s, the U.S. government demanded that Israel agree to international inspections. Israel agreed, but on the condition that U.S., rather than International Atomic Energy Agency, inspectors be used, and that Israel would receive advance notice of all inspections
20
posted on
02/21/2012 11:00:17 PM PST
by
U-238
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson