Posted on 02/21/2012 7:12:42 AM PST by Marguerite
Really? I would be ashamed to. Usually articles by liberal scum are only posted for counterpoint arguments...not to support our own views. It looks to me like a desperate move to smear a good man. Shameful.
Romneybot post.
Big hair boy Trump must have written this.
at the end of the day it boils down to that.
Did you catch Santorum on Hannity’s TV show last night? Sean had him on to help him “explain” his recent remarks concerning phony theology, contraception, etc. Sean did his best, but the problem is that if a candidate has to go on a friendly TV show and spend 10 minutes or so explaining remarks that the media can play over and over in sound bites, well, he has a big problem. I see that in one poll, Romney has caught up to him in Michigan. If Santorum falls in Michigan and Arizona, I don’t believe he has time for another comeback. Newt seems to be positioned perfectly, as Rush said, to step in as the non-Romney once Santorum falls back.
Many of us have not really decided on our favorite candidate in the GOP...but we sure don't want you guys telling us who to chose, or why. Especially since you obviously picked the wrong guy last time and he is in the WH now destroying our country. Y'all ain't too smart! LOL
Me thinks that the article poster is a Newtbot.
That's not a problem for me—or for Santorum. Most women are pro-life, by a bigger percentage than men.
You have 4 or 5 choices. St. Rick, St. Newt, St. Mitt, or St. Paul. And you already know the 5th is Dear Leader.
That is it. Two are okay, one is not, and one is only half okay. One is horrible.
The two that are okay are all we have left against the one that isn’t, and the one that is horrible. The fact we still have two that are okay is a good buffer.
That is reality. A brokered convention will give you St. Mitt.
From 2001 to 2004, the Pennsylvania district school paid $38,000 per year as tuition for five of his children living in Virginia all around the year, on a cyber-home school program to Rick Santorum.
Do the math yourself.
Santorum told KDKA Radio that his niece lives in and “looks after” the Penn Hills house when he’s not there. He also admitted that when he goes to Pennsylvania, where he spends “about a month per year” there, he and most of the family usually stay somewhere else — with his in-laws — while his niece and her husband keep “watching” the house:
“We have a nice arrangement there. It works out well. Candidly, we just sort of work it out. Sometimes, a couple of my kids stay over there with the niece and her husband.”
But $100,000 paid for by local property taxes isn’t nothing. So under public pressure Santorum withdrew his children from the cyber school, but refused to reimburse the Penn Hills School District, who had to go to court to get back the $100,000 – spending even MORE time and MORE taxpayer dollars to get back money Santorum never should have pursued in the first place.
The Department of Education decided to end the dispute in 2006 by paying back to the Penn Hills District School a sum of $55,000 (federal funds from taxpayers’ money as well).
Absurd.
And who is this “we”? You and this Marg are a team?
I’ve seen Marguerite on other threads. She’s a Newt supporter.
When do I ‘patholgically smear’ Newt? I merely point out that Newt is undisciplined and can’t be trusted. I can point to his climate change rhetoric and commercials as examples. That’s not a smear. That’s an argument. Posting drivel from liberals is a smear.
What you said! I get sooo sick of people like Neal Boortz saying the same thing, that we've got to bow to the precious moderates and independents. Funny how Comrade Zero doesn't have to come across as a "moderate".
so this reporter is upset the MSM did not “take out” santorum.
This just goes with what Brit Hume is saying, the MSM is so out of step with the real world that when someone makes a statement about the obvious, the MSM freaks out.
Yep. And a frustrated, desperate one at that.
That may be the worst analysis I’ve seen on FR in days. That is not at all what happened. You may be technically correct about his comeback, but your reasoning is beneath specific reply.
I have a better question.
How the hell did a common grifter become President of the United States?
ML/NJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.