Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kitsap Rifle & Revolver Club story illustrates problem with gun range conflicts(WA)
Seattle Gun Rights Examiner ^ | 17 February, 2012 | Dave Workman

Posted on 02/18/2012 6:44:14 AM PST by marktwain

Days after a Pierce County Superior Court judge ordered that the Kitsap Rifle and Revolver Club to shut down until it can obtain land-use permits, the controversy over how this club operated is sizzling.

Located along the old Seabeck Highway, when the club was originally founded generations ago, there were not a lot of people living in the area. The noise from shooting didn’t bother anybody, because there wasn't anyone within earshot to be bothered.

Nowadays, that has changed dramatically because human encroachment into former forest land has brought with it the almost obligatory conflict between gun ranges and people who moved “to the country” for peace and quiet.

Matters have not been helped any by a local “community columnist” for the Kitsap Sun, who has had some smarmy things to say about the club’s publicized purpose.

A glimpse into the club's mind is evident on its website where the claim is made that the right to keep and bear arms comes from God, a claim that may help explain the almost-religious fervor with which some gun owners pursue their cause.

The website also claims that the club was established for "sport and national defense." Sport, yes, but "national defense" is a pretty grandiose claim. While some of their members and instructors are veterans of our military organizations, and while the club holds competitions among law enforcement teams, it's far from the well-organized militia referred to in the Second Amendment.—Rob Woutat, Kitsap Sun

That description may not be entirely accurate. You be the judge. Incidentally, there’s nothing about a “well-organized” militia in the Second Amendment. It’s a “well-regulated” militia. Here’s what the KRRC website actually states:

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: banglist; kitsap; range; wa
Ranges all over the United States face the same attacks.
1 posted on 02/18/2012 6:44:22 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Used to shoot at that range when we lived up in Bremerton, WA. It is out in the wilderness. But as the lefty moves into those areas, they whine about noise and turn up the stero and blast the air waves away.


2 posted on 02/18/2012 6:50:02 AM PST by RetiredArmy (POLITICIANS: Promise the moon. Deliver the shaft.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

If your state has not passed a “Range Protection Law” contact your state representatives to do so now. Such laws bar nuisance cases such as sound, traffic or times of shooting from being filed against existing ranges. It does not trump safety if a round leaves the range, so make sure the back stops are high and all members direct shots to not escape the range.


3 posted on 02/18/2012 6:50:24 AM PST by RicocheT (Eat the rich only if you're certain it's your last meal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

If silencers were no longer subject to ridiculous NFA restrictions, range noise would no longer be a problem.


4 posted on 02/18/2012 6:57:05 AM PST by TonyInOhio (Imagine HHS ordering mosques to pay for employee bacon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

My Dad use to have 5 acres in that area, adjacent to the gate that the train would hull weapons into Bangor Submarine Base. Nearly every weekend in the Summer, anti-war hippies would block the track, and if a train came, police would run them off. Often several would come running through the woods onto my Dad’s property, where he stood with his gun. He never shot at them, but I think he rather enjoyed the sport of scaring the hell out of them. Held them face down on the ground until police arrived, and they would be arrested for violating the posted no trespassing signs. There was a Nudist camp the next property over. Hear tell they also enjoyed the sport of hippie catching, though it wasn’t just guns pointing at them.


5 posted on 02/18/2012 7:07:58 AM PST by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Michigan has a range protection law that shields ranges from both neighbors that claim being bothered by noise, and those using the range and suing for injury from said use.

A companion bill was also passed to shield property owners from suit from those engaged in hunting on their property. Thus only gross neglect to inform of a known, hidden unnatural danger can result in a suit for damages.

Private shooting ranges are also protected and no licensing or registration is required.

6 posted on 02/18/2012 7:32:50 AM PST by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

I am a big fan of the idea of getting around urban sprawl by setting up gun ranges right in the middle of it, as it were.

Industrial parks are zoned to permit noise and traffic, and are away from residences, schools and other activities that are disturbed by gun use. But they are also expensive places for warehouses.

But a very large gun range could be built underground just beneath a warehouse, with all sorts of benefits.

1) While needing a good ventilation system, it would also boast of “lead control” of expended ammunition, avoiding land pollution problems. But it could operate year around, even in inclement weather.

2) A much more convenient location to most metro area gun users, than having to drive many miles outside of the metro area. As such, it could also support gun qualifications for large groups including police departments, Boy Scouts; and school rifle teams, rare today because there is no place for them to practice.

3) Such a range could also sell refreshments, have a play area for young children and other amenities to make it more family friendly.


7 posted on 02/18/2012 8:45:44 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

All contributions are for the
Current Quarter Expenses.


8 posted on 02/18/2012 8:50:56 AM PST by RedMDer (Forward With Confidence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Build that house near the airport, then demand that no flights go over it.


9 posted on 02/19/2012 12:35:11 AM PST by JimRed (Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson