None of them are solid conservatives of course.
Solid conservatives don’t want to run for these jobs.
We just have to get as close as we can.
I guess it depends on the definition of “conservative” on many subjects
This is from another FR thread. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2815398/posts
1998 was the last year that Gingrich, Paul and Santorum were all in Congress. Gingrichs annual and lifetime ACU ratings were better than both of the others:
(100% = perfect conservative voting record)
100% - Gingrich: Annual 1998 ACU Rating (90% Lifetime Rating as of 1998)
88% - Paul: Annual 1998 ACU Rating (88% Lifetime Rating as of 1998)
84% - Santorum: Annual 1998 ACU Rating (83% Lifetime Rating as of 1998)
Source: http://www.conservative.org/ratings/ratingsarchive/1998/98houseratings.htm
I’m voting Republican. If Lucifer himself has an R by his name, he’s got my vote. Yes, a bad choice, but better than the devil we have now.
Of course these results are defined according to whatever the statistician defines as being “conservative”.
I tell you how:
Rick: "I am the most conservative"
Mitt: "I am severely, extremely, obsessionally conservative"
Newt: "Here are my plans to restore America prosperity and greatness"
http://www.newt.org/solutions
Newt doesn't need to say it, EVERYBODY knows he's a staunch conservative Republican, from the age of 19, when he became immersed in politics. He never wavered. He is the best candidate the The Republicans have had in the last 25 years.
America needs SOLUTIONS , not Talking Points