And this is the flaw of vaccines. It shows they really don’t work that well at all. Not if everyone else has to have it too. Otherwise if they worked so well, the ones who were vaccinated would have nothing to worry about.
Given the fact that drug makers know they are selling expensive prescription drugs that at best, work on only 50% of those that take them, and I’ve seen a senior pharma guy admit this in an interview, are we surprised that vaccines really don’t work that well?
Have you read the articles discussing the fact that the majority of flu cases each year are in people who have taken the flu vaccine? The one year they totally messed up the batches and said they wouldn’t work against the flu that year, so hardly anyone took it - as it’d truly be worthless - the flu deaths went down greatly. The year I believe was 2007-8 (it’s in the oughts) and the very year most elderly didn’t get vaccinated was the year elderly flu deaths were shockingly low.
“And this is the flaw of vaccines. It shows they really don’t work that well at all.”
Yeah, I miss iron lungs from polio and smallpox, too.
The good old days, you know?
How about rabies vaccine? Get rabies and take it, you live. Don't take it, you die. Then there's tetanus. How many cases of that have you heard about lately?
Obviously vaccines as active agents will have a certain risk, tiny but greater than zero. So much is true for any medicine or treatment whatsover. If you want to avoid 100% of that risk fine, just give up on all of medicine whatsoever, and good luck to you.
It's fine to bloviate opinions from the fringe but I worry some fairly naive person may read your rants, not have the background to see it for what it is, and maybe make a very bad decision as a result. Maybe that possibility doesn't bother you though.