Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Could concussions actually kill football?
Yahoo Sports ^ | 2-14-2012 | Doug Farrar

Posted on 02/15/2012 5:36:05 AM PST by Colonel Kangaroo

If the sport of football ever dies, it will die from the outside in. -- Jonah Lehrer

If an increasing number of economists and trend analysts are to be believed, we may one day look back at something like Colt McCoy's concussion against the Pittsburgh Steelers in 2011 as one of many galvanic events that blew football apart, and reduced the country's most popular sport to a marginal pastime. It's unlikely that such a colossal financial concern as football could be killed off entirely, but as Malcolm Gladwell first wrote in the New Yorker in 2009, it's not crazy to think that an increasing number of player concussions -- and the NFL's real lack of concern about those injuries despite its public face -- could have Americans looking at football very differently down the road.

Gladwell's article, which compared football to dogfighting and revealed some truly horrifying information about the effects of concussions on the minds and bodies of football players...

(Excerpt) Read more at sports.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chat; football; nfl; sports
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last
To: dfwgator

Amen that. I’m with you on the pitchers’ duals - a good low-scoring game is like a true thriller - lots of of tension. Or to quote Willie Wonka quoting Oscar Wilde: “The suspense in unbearable — I hope it lasts.”


81 posted on 02/15/2012 7:48:57 AM PST by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

I think fans of any fringe sport, be it Soccer, or NASCAR or UFC, take that kind of attitude...as if they feel like they have to defend their choice of which sport they follow.


82 posted on 02/15/2012 7:52:19 AM PST by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Hockey did reduce the size of pads that goal keepers can wear a couple of years ago. The size and increased understanding of weight training and so on has changed the very essence of some of these sports, which makes it hard to know how to tweak the rules without ruining the original intent of the game.

A ten foot basket means something totally different than it did 50 years ago. Same with the size of hockey nets. Same with a 100 yard field. Always a balancing act.


83 posted on 02/15/2012 7:52:36 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Yes you are right, but the “odor” of the NASCAR fan would be totally different than the “odor” of the soccer fan. The NASCAR fan would be more like the Wal Mart shopper than the Prius driver as an analogy. A writer could have fun with either - and it would not necessarily mean an attack on the sport per se.


84 posted on 02/15/2012 7:54:46 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah; dfwgator; C. Edmund Wright
Being a serious fan of hockey (love football, NCAA basketball), I just can't agree about the low scoring theory.

I believe the average score is higher than it was 10, 20, or 30 years ago. It's been a low scoring game for as long as I've been a fan, yet the average scoring is higher now than ever.

Its an exciting game, physical, tough, highly skilled athletes playing at inconceivable speeds on a hard surface. Something for everyone, plus it happens to be the most exciting sport to watch live, at the arena.

85 posted on 02/15/2012 8:04:55 AM PST by Lakeshark (NbIttoalbl,cRwIdtaa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah; dfwgator; C. Edmund Wright

Btw, the Red Wings are amazing, and have been for over 15 years: http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nhl-puck-daddy/detroit-red-wings-hit-21-straight-home-wins-034152724.html;_ylt=AtbJXwgn5YjlyuD5VjBPvQ17vLYF


86 posted on 02/15/2012 8:08:37 AM PST by Lakeshark (NbIttoalbl,cRwIdtaa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

I find women’s curling more entertaining.


87 posted on 02/15/2012 8:09:26 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle
Rugby!

No shoulder pads, fantastic conditioning, minimal headgear (protecting against cauliflower ears,) and plenty of violence.

The injuries are considerably less because one can't run at 100% into the body of an opponent without reciprocal injury.

88 posted on 02/15/2012 8:09:42 AM PST by Thommas (The snout of the camel is in the tent..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

My Dad told me about a game he went to back at the old Olympia against the Canadiens.....it was scoreless until the fifth overtime, when finally Rocket Richard ended it.


89 posted on 02/15/2012 8:10:44 AM PST by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

“In 50 years, the “National Football League” in the USA may be playing what most of us call soccer today.”

Naw, the NFL will be playing flag football, co-ed.


90 posted on 02/15/2012 8:13:55 AM PST by snoringbear (Government is the Pimp,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thommas

-—The injuries are considerably less because one can’t run at 100% into the body of an opponent without reciprocal injury.——

Makes sense. The only problem I can see is a vulnerable receiver getting “pin-wheeled” and landing on his head.


91 posted on 02/15/2012 8:25:44 AM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas (Viva Christo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Bird

“... the fact that mothers will NOT let their sons play football if they believe the risk of harm is too great”.

Perhaps with some Moms... the type that force their little boys to play with dolls and wear a sweater in July. NOT this Mom! My son plays high school football and I have seen firsthand the benefits: physical fitness, male bonding, working together as a team, and that translates into focus in grades. I think “football” Moms may be a different breed... do we pray and hope no child gets injured? Yes. However, we are also the first ones cheering a good “hit” and a good play. Football doesn’t worry me much... that fact that he will be driving soon has me TERRIFIED!


92 posted on 02/15/2012 8:27:52 AM PST by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun

It won’t get outlawed, it’ll just run out of players. Given the information we have today on concussions, their frequency in football and their lifetime effects, good parents are already starting to keep their kids away from youth football. If they aren’t playing football in high school and before they won’t in college and probably won’t wind up in the pros. And because the game has never taken off internationally there won’t be that influx of players.


93 posted on 02/15/2012 8:30:52 AM PST by discostu (How Will I Laugh Tomorrow When I Can't Even Smile Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

As a Carolina Hurricanes’ season tix holder, I too love hockey. I do believe the NHL improved the game a few years ago when they loosened up the offside rule by widening the blue line and only calling offsides when it impacts the offensive flow of the game. Big improvement.

The international game, with wider rinks, does not suffer from the congestion the NHL game does, because the NHL game is made for rinks that can be put in multi use basketball arena’s which shrinks the ice by definition.

One key difference in hockey and soccer is the the offsides rule in soccer is a penalty for actually beating a person deep. You get penalized for doing what you should do. The offsides in hockey is for being in the wrong place at the wrong time and has nothing to do with the position of the other team’s players. That’s a huge difference for rules that have the same name and somewhat of the same intent.

As for its popularity: if it was a tad more high scoring - and more games were televised in hi def so you can follow the puck - it would be more popular than it is now.


94 posted on 02/15/2012 8:32:27 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: ops33

It’s a bruise on the brain, that recent studies have shown always lead to some level of permanent damage.


95 posted on 02/15/2012 8:38:29 AM PST by discostu (How Will I Laugh Tomorrow When I Can't Even Smile Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

My dad was a star high school football player back in the 1940s. They wore leather helmets. He played all out and was knocked totally unconscious more than once and suffered other concussions. Once he continued playing the whole game and had no memory of it the next day.

He went on to get his Ph.D. in anatomy and taught at the medical school for many years. In his late 50s he had an episode of total memory loss where he did not know my mother’s name or how to get home from work. He recovered from that quickly and was fine for several more years. Then he had several more of these episodes in his 60s and began a long steady decline into dementia. He died in 2009 at the age of 81.

I don’t know if there is a connection, but...there it is for what it’s worth.

I cannot stand watching movies and tv dramas where a blow to the head is portrayed as a harmless temporary anesthetic.


96 posted on 02/15/2012 8:49:07 AM PST by Drawsing (The fool shows his annoyance at once. The prudent man overlooks an insult. (Proverbs 12:16))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
...that it's one of the only "timed" sports where the clock runs even when play is stopped...

Yeah, that's where a DVR comes in handy to pause it to go grab another beer. :-)

But, 45 minute non-stop halves without annoying commercials is a good thing.

97 posted on 02/15/2012 9:07:13 AM PST by FReepaholic (Stupidity is not a crime, so you're free to go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
High def makes it a great game, but it's still best at the Joe. Loud, knowledgeable, supportive fans, and have been from the late seventies on. I had never watched a hockey game in my life until we moved to Michigan (coincidentally at the beginning of this Wings run).

Were you there during the Cup series between Carolina and the Wings? I recall watching (before DVR's) a triple overtime game played down there.

98 posted on 02/15/2012 9:10:53 AM PST by Lakeshark (NbIttoalbl,cRwIdtaa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

We were at the over flow big screen outside the arena for game 3 - which determined the cup winner probably. My family had such a great time I convinced them to get season tix starting 04. That day was probably the best day of tailgating in NHL history. All the Detroit folks teasing Mayberry about their hockey team, and the Canes fans playing right along by dressing up as Andy and Barney and offering the Wings fans barbecue and so on all day long outside the arena. Most fun day ever in Raleigh I think.

Was there for game 7 Finals in 2006 too. Neighbor of coach Lavoilette in fact at the time. Amazing atmosphere. I ended up near the cup like 5 times in 7 days.

Caniac’s are a fun group, the only thing Dukies, Tar Heels and Wolfpackers agree on down here.


99 posted on 02/15/2012 9:22:11 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
I think the deminishment of boxing came through pay per view - playing to a smaller and smaller crowd of intent loyal viewers - and the mess of there being so MANY different “champions” at any given time - and there not being a dominant amazing heavyweight champ like Ali or Tyson.

Now there is UFC. It is a lot more brutal than boxing. They have old matches on SPIKE TV to generate interest and name recognition, and I find it about 100 times more interesting than boxing to watch.

100 posted on 02/15/2012 9:34:46 AM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson