Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: U-238

21 B-2s at two billion apiece would be $42 billion, wouldn’t it? The author says they spent hundreds of billions developing the B-2. That doesn’t add up right.


30 posted on 02/11/2012 7:17:49 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: blueunicorn6
21 B-2s at two billion apiece would be $42 billion, wouldn’t it? The author says they spent hundreds of billions developing the B-2. That doesn’t add up right.

Probably full-lifecycle costs for the entire program, rather than just what was needed to get the aircraft built and turned over to the USAF.

So in addition to the aircraft you'd be looking at facilities (the B-2A facility at Whiteman is about as gold-plated as you can get. Each bomber has its own individual hangar), plus the costs of keeping the aircraft upgraded with the latest/greatest bells and whistles (the B-2A has gone from Block 1 through Block 2 and to Block 3 upgrades). Then throw in the cost of personnel, maintaining the Det out at Edwards for testing (Spirit of New York), etc.
32 posted on 02/11/2012 7:29:27 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson