Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/08/2012 4:57:35 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: All

Don't Be Fooled In 2012!!
Keep Up With The REAL News
Conservatives Need From FR!!
Please Help Keep It Going !!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


2 posted on 02/08/2012 5:00:07 PM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

As a long-time resident of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, I can say with utter conviction that Mitt Romney made an utter pig’s breakfast of the political situation here.

His “wonderful” healthcare reform has been a disaster, with cost overruns going ballistic, and actually making it MORE difficult for some to obtain health insurance.

Meanwhile, doctors are quitting their practice of medecine, taking early retirement, or simply refusing to accept any new patients.

His wishy-wishy stand on the Second Amendment did nothing to alleviate longstanding FFL inequities in the commonwealth, as well as related blatant and bare-faced abuses of power by two of the State’s Attorneys General.

To top it all off, as soon as he’d done the damage, he bailed out to “go national.”

Personally I wouldn’t vote for Mitt Romney for Toilet Attendant, but... Lord Help Us... even HE is better than the Marxist Obama, even if only marginally.

Let’s hope there’s someone - anyone - else on the Republican ticket, but... if he somehow gets the party nod, let’s hope he defeats Obama.

And, yes, saying so is indicative of just how low we’ve sunk as a nation.


3 posted on 02/08/2012 5:14:19 PM PST by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

But a far more serious issue is ObamaCare,

If Romeny had even distanced himself from Romneycare I might have reluctlently accepted him. But he is actually PROUD of it. He defends it. He LOVES it.

By doing this he SCREAMS I AM A LIBERAL! And I don’t CARE what you think about me, just vote for me and shut up.


5 posted on 02/08/2012 5:16:23 PM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Yep! That does not keep the GOP pundits from praising the wonderful attributes of Romney though - does it?

Makes me wonder just why we even have elections anymore. It seems that the party machines actually control the outcome anyway. We sheeple just seem to keep going along for the ride.


6 posted on 02/08/2012 5:19:04 PM PST by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The funny thing that happened to Mitt Romney on the way to his coronation was Sarah Palin who intervened in South Carolina to keep the process going.


7 posted on 02/08/2012 5:25:44 PM PST by maxter (We cannot let freedom fade under our watch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

It seems like Santorum has less baggage than the other two.
While I don’t agree with all Santorum’s positions, I could
vote for him. Of course, there’s a long way to go (1,000 delegates) It may be a brokered convention yet.


12 posted on 02/08/2012 5:48:42 PM PST by upcountryhorseman (An old fashioned conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

At the very least, Santorum, walked back a lot of his votes and offered explanations for them. He has articulated how fed up with big government we are, and he said “I get it.”

I like Gingrich’s bold plans, but if he doesn’t get anywhere I would vote for Santorum because I think free market conservatives would at least have a fighting chance at persuasion, whereas for Romney I don’t really think so.

If the “establishment” wanted a moderate, there are quite a few to choose from that don’t have Romney’s liberal governing baggage, the kind of baggage that will make a huge difference in the lives of everyone for years to come. And it irritates me to no end that they picked this guy, the grandmaster of forced healthcare, who resorts to the language of class warfare from the left when cornered by the press, with nary a clue as to how angry we are, not just about ObamneyCare, but about all the epic fail central planning, the spending and governing like the guy on the street just doesn’t matter. It’s got to stop. I am so irritated about this that the race, for me at least, has become more about defeating that whole mindset and showing them who is in charge.

I am, therefore, reveling in Romney’s astounding defeat last night. I hope to see the RINO establishment running from this guy as fast as they can. If they have to get someone else, someone who we can at least feel comfortable with, and take care of the problem at the convention, then I’ll be just fine with that. As long as it isn’t Romney.


17 posted on 02/08/2012 6:25:15 PM PST by dajeeps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

GOP Voters Are SCREAMING ‘We Don’t Want Romney!’


19 posted on 02/08/2012 7:25:37 PM PST by matthew fuller (Obama has definitely earned a second term- 99 years in Leavenworth USP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
it seems to be today's Republican voters saying, "We don't want Romney! We don't want Romney!"

Music to my Pennsylvania ears. We've been waiting 150+ years to redress the Buchanan disaster.

21 posted on 02/08/2012 7:28:11 PM PST by lightman (Adjutorium nostrum (+) in nomine Domini--nevertheless, Vote Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Shuddup and eat your peas!!!


22 posted on 02/08/2012 7:53:52 PM PST by Dogbert41 ("...or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the Great King. " -Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

“Even in Colorado, where Gov. Romney came closest to winning, the combined votes for Sen. Santorum and Speaker Gingrich added up to an absolute majority against him.”

Look folks, whatever you feel about whatever candidate, the assumption is faulty here.

That assumption is that if one candidate dropped out, some other candidate would get 100% of their votes.

Not justifiable statistically, not a valid numbers argument.


24 posted on 02/09/2012 4:09:55 AM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson